Bulletbrain
Spy
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2007
- Messages
- 458
- Reaction score
- 0
:O
http://movies.ign.com/articles/788/788412p1.html
I liked Tintin back when I was a kid so I'm happy that it is getting a big break. But Speilburg and Jackson?!? That is a teeny bit overkill wont you say? Plus how are they going to convert those cartoony dotted eyes and tiny noses to "photo-realistic CG"?
http://movies.ign.com/articles/788/788412p1.html
Instead of being live-action as expected, the Tintin pictures will be CG ? but with a twist. They won't "look" computer-generated; instead, they'll look photo-realistic, but the world and its characters will resemble the comic as Herg? drew it, mimicking the author's ligne claire illustration style and cartoony figures. State-of-the-art motion-capture technology will be used to transfer the movements of real actors onto the digital Tintin set. Apparently, Jackson's effects company WETA has already spent $1.7 million producing a demo reel for the trilogy.
I liked Tintin back when I was a kid so I'm happy that it is getting a big break. But Speilburg and Jackson?!? That is a teeny bit overkill wont you say? Plus how are they going to convert those cartoony dotted eyes and tiny noses to "photo-realistic CG"?