Strikeout, why not?

[Dog--]

Look at Samon's title - it uses strikeout, so why don't we have it on the forums to use?

 

[Kamikazie]

Because, it only looks good on Samon. Just like teriyaki sauce.

 

[kineaesth]

The question is, why do we need it?

 

[Dog--]

That's the same as saying "why do we need bold, italic, or underline"..

We just do.

 

[MorganFreeman911]

Test to see if we have it.

EDIT: Darn we don't have it.

 

[Jintor]

I'd love it.

 

[Trooper]

No need for it really. Plus, its just a custom title. Why the fuss?

 

[soulslicer]

he is a mod and he has decided to put himself at a higher pedestal than us, what can we folks of the lower castes do..

really it doesn't bother me..at least he can never be a combine overlord

 

[CyberPitz]

Maybe he is, IN DISGUISE?!? :O

 

[Tagaziel]

Strikethrough is useful for conveying emotions and... for lulz, man.

Without it, we can't say "Welcome to HL2.net, now drop the soap enjoy your stay."

Strikethrough IS necessary

*cast "Whine, whine, Munro, whine, implement" spell.*

 

[Stigmata]

Strikeout is awesome.

 

[Xendance]

Strikeout would be good.

 

[watermonster]

Vote for strikeout!

 

[Vegeta897]

So far you can only use it in the News section using <strike>. It's the only board where HTML is enabled.

 

[Sloth]

We don't need it... Would be nice to have but we don't need it.

 

[Stigmata]

That's not a very good reason.

 

[kineaesth]

Make a poll then. If enough people want it, it'll maybe happen.

 

[Vegeta897]

If none of the "No." moderators are on, and Munro IS on, and not wanking, it'll maybe happen.

Fixed.

 

[kineaesth]

Fixed.

LoL, own't.
*doesn't know who the 'No' moderators are.*

 

[Xendance]

LoL, own't.
*doesn't know who the 'No' moderators are.*

Pi Mu Rho is one

They just come on, and reply with a fat 'No.'

Too bad there is a 5 char limit

 

[Ennui]

No. i couldn't resist, you bastards