A new study proves violent games can and do have negative physiological affects on the minds of young players.
http://www.livescience.com/healthday/536261.html
http://www.livescience.com/healthday/536261.html
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
A new study proves violent games can and do have negative physiological affects on the minds of young players.
http://www.livescience.com/healthday/536261.html
They have been saying it alters the thought process of kids for years. I've played violent games all my life, I'm fine...hell, most people here have. We are living proof of the fact that it's just retarded kids and kids not getting disciplined, or the parents not pointing out that video games are not REALITY.
Or they are buying their kids Doom 3 at the age of 12...
Or are we proof of the opposite?
Perhaps the fact the games that we grew up weren't so close to life has a bearing on the differences between us and the youngsters?
-Angry Lawyer
Proof that it's true? I don't know of many of us who go off and kill people or do stupid shit...
THAT I KNOW OF. lol
Wait wait... so you guys don't go out killing innocent virgin women?
A new study proves violent games can and do have negative physiological affects on the minds of young players.
http://www.livescience.com/healthday/536261.html
However these studies don't give you an amount. How much less were the kids self control? Can the results be replicated? Does it wear off over time?A new study proves violent games can and do have negative physiological affects on the minds of young players.
I'm not seeing much conclusive evidence of negative effects in the article. It talks about emotional arousal and loss of inhibition, how does that not apply to any sort stimulating entertainment? You get that from music. I feel a lot more pumped up after listening punk/metal, no doubt more aggressive too. Isn't that actually the whole point of a violent game as opposed to a non-violent one, more emotional stimulation?
And what exactly did this test, test? It speaks of letting the kids play a violent or non-violent game for 30 minutes, and right after they were tested through MRI. Get me a test that tracks kids from birth to adulthood under proper parenting which shows a correlation between permanent behaviour changes and playing games. Thirty minutes of playtime mean dick.
What this study has proven is that entertainment who's entire purpose is to thrill people, does in fact do so!
I don't think anyone disputed that a violent game, movie, comic or song could get emotional responses from you. I still see no reason that shows that violent games alone can turn an otherwise healthy person into a permanently unhealthy, bad/violent person. Did Little Billy change into The Chainsaw Slasher through playing violent games, or did Billy lose it because of being a social outcast or being mentally unstable?
So far, all those school shooters could as well have been avid stamp collectors instead of gamers, but they left little doubt that it was society that pissed them off. But you can't ban teasing, bad parents or mental defects, banning the latest scapegoat, or wanting to, is effective for rallying votes from soccer mums. Perhaps they used games/movies/music as inspiration, but how exactly are you going to prevent people getting inspiration? Thought police?
For me personally, I take great love in killing my enemies in the bloodiest ways. In games that is, because in real life, I haven't been desensitized to violence at all. I couldn't watch a movie with an actual person dying without becoming physically sick.
I just killed 6 cops last week because they had the audacity to give me 3 stars! Then I was given 5 stars and so I had evade a few tanks and kill some swat officers.
Pvt's correct here.
The same effects come from common sports as well, but you don't see many people blaming basketball for the next bi-annual shooting.
(Gosh, three deaths a year. Call the centre for disease control!)
Also: Dicarus?
We aren't talking about violence. We're talking about:
-Emotional arousal
-Lowered inhibitions
Both are a direct result of playing basketball.
The point is that games are no more violence-inducing than sports are (which, as you said, is not really violent at all).
I just killed 6 cops last week because they had the audacity to give me 3 stars! Then I was given 5 stars and so I had evade a few tanks and kill some swat officers.
We aren't talking about violence. We're talking about:
-Emotional arousal
-Lowered inhibitions
Both are a direct result of playing basketball.
The point is that games are no more violence-inducing than sports are (which, as you said, is not really violent at all).
No, it doesn't.Perhaps the fact the games that we grew up weren't so close to life has a bearing on the differences between us and the youngsters?