Suckabee: Iraq prbbly had wmds, but I have no evidence

Not only to justify Iraq war, he will change the Constitution too.

Quote, "[Some of my opponents] do not want to change the Constitution, but I believe it's a lot easier to change the Constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God, and that's what we need to do is to amend the Constitution so it's in God's standards rather than try to change God's standards."

- Mike Huckabee, campaigning in Michigan last night. 1/14/08

http://forum.cygnus-study.com/showthread.php?t=10173
 
For once in my life I might agree with the almighty kathaksung.
 
I hope he's president...



/massive collective puke
 
Well the good thing is he will pretty much not be the republican presidential candidate.

Out of all the republican candidates, I'm going to have to pick Mccain as my least evil of the evil. I don't know much about him... but I do know he is against torture, he is critical of bush's waging of the iraq war(how it was waged, not that it was waged). Not ideal, but better than crazy fundamentalist Huckabee... and fat cat Romney.

Of course, I won't be voting republican though. When it comes down to it, I'll be voting for Obama if he gets chosen as democratic presidential nominee, or even Hillary if that's what it comes down to.
 
Wait.. is this guy running for President?

/ignorantbrit
 
Some consider former Iraqi president, "So-damn Insane" <(figure this one out) to be a WMD. Was he really dangerous enough to warrant total usurp of his regime though? To his own people perhaps, but that's something that should be sorted out amongst the citizens of Iraq. The people there have to have the desire to change for the change to work for the better imo. I do not like Suckleberry either. Though I am Christian, he is far too much of an extremist douche. There needs to be an even balance to things when it comes to politics. *Yeah right. Like that'll happen in this world* /arms What about the GOP's so-called, "plan to root out terrorism?" Was there any liable reason to assume that by rooting out all terror cells that the likelyhood for the danger that WMD's would be used against us? ("us" meaning coalition forces)
 
Some consider former Iraqi president, "So-damn Insane" <(figure this one out) to be a WMD. Was he really dangerous enough to warrant total usurp of his regime though? To his own people perhaps, but that's something that should be sorted out amongst the citizens of Iraq. The people there have to have the desire to change for the change to work for the better imo. I do not like Suckleberry either. Though I am Christian, he is far too much of an extremist douche. There needs to be an even balance to things when it comes to politics. *Yeah right. Like that'll happen in this world* /arms What about the GOP's so-called, "plan to root out terrorism?" Was there any liable reason to assume that by rooting out all terror cells that the likelyhood for the danger that WMD's would be used against us? ("us" meaning coalition forces)

Related to this, when we first overthrew Saddamn, I saw them interview some iraqi's on tv. They felt they're lives had improved and they were optimistic.

Ask any iraqi today if they're lives had improved. Chances are they will say no, thanks to the sectarian violence.
 
535. Huckabee and Evangelical (Iowa lesson 4) (1/28/0

Why I say Huckabee is a representative of the Feds?

1. Media blew the trumpet on Iowa Primary to hint that it had correctly selected the president in recent primaries. It hints that Edwards (planned to win Demo Caucus though failed) or Huckabee would be the next US President. It is a pre-conception mind control. I view it as Feds' intention.

2. Huckabee was unpopular compare with other Republican's candidates. He also has less campaign fund than his rivals. How could he jumped to the leading seat? He is said conservative, so are the most of other GOP candidates. Is he a Bush basher? Then nobody can compare with Ron Paul. Does he have any extraordinary policy to appeal public? None. How could he suddenly become a hot idle and win the Iowa Primary? The media voluntarily cooked his news. (compare to how media deliberately censor the news of Ron Paul) Since the election office and the media are manipulated by Feds, I view him as Feds' candidate.

Anyhow, media gave a reason why Huckabee won Iowa - it says religion lift him to victory. When did President election become a religious campaign? Is it for a politician or for a missionary? It's as ridiculous as that a man won the CEO of a big firm because he identifies himself as an evangelical. The media says, "Affable Huckabee wins over evangelical voters."

3. Although it is absurd, I think media - a traditional mind control tool - this time tells truth. I view evangelical voters as a power base of the Inside group who controls this country. "Evangelical voters" doesn't mean majority of Americans but the will of the Inside Group. Here is the story how Feds related to this power base and how its representative announcing its annual plan in the name of prophecy.

Quote, "John Ashcroft to teach class at Va. college
By Richard Willing, USA TODAY

One month after leaving office, former U.S. attorney general John Ashcroft has a new job: He'll be a part-time professor at a Christian university run by television evangelist Pat Robertson

<http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-03-16-ashcroft-teach_x.htm>


Quote, 'Pat Robertson Predicts Worldwide Violence, U.S. Recession in 2008

Wednesday, January 02, 2008

NORFOLK, Va. - On Wednesday's "700 Club" broadcast, the founder of the Christian Broadcasting Network predicted that evangelism will increase and more people will seek God as the chaos develops.

Last year, Robertson predicted that a terrorist act, possibly involving a nuclear weapon, would result in mass killing in the United States.

<http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,319728,00.html>

1. When Feds has the technique to alter climate, such like create hurricane, earthquake.... while people don't know there is such kind of technique, they would believe it's work of God. (Hurricane Katrina, 2005 South Asia tsunami...)

2. When Government insider used to activate false flag terror attack (911 attack, anthrax letter....)to grab power and money from people, innocent people thought it was done by Al Qaida, Saddam....

3. While Feds controlled the election system by their informant or assets, it's easy to rig the election. That's how Bush could be selected twice and Ron Paul always be neglected.

You know the trick, then you know so said God for Pat Robertson is Feds. He just announces their annual plan in advance. Plan sometimes went soured due to the situation. But he still goes on with his psychological operation under the cover of evangelical broadcaster. He had predicted Bush would be president. (they control media and election office) He almost successful in prediction of nuclear attack in 2007. (Remember 8/31/07, a B-52 mis-loading nuclear missiles and flying over US continent) Now re-consider the meaning of his words:"evangelism will increase and more people will seek God as the chaos develops."

_________________
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.
 
he is critical of bush's waging of the iraq war(how it was waged, not that it was waged).
I hear this a lot. But I can not recall a single time he has been critical of the war policy, at least not until after 2006 when he knew he would be running for president.

I agree with you that he is better than all the others, but he still sucks.
 
Back
Top