Yuri
Tank
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2004
- Messages
- 5,373
- Reaction score
- 4
CNN Source
This case may lead tro the issue of the legality of abortion as a whole. And "late term abortions" apparantly doesn't restrict itself to "partial birth abortions," (which is effed up stuff, if you ask me) but can be as early as 12 weeks in the pregnancy...
Washington (CNN) said:The Supreme Court wasted little time jumping back into the contentious abortion issue, agreeing Tuesday to review the constitutionality of a federal law banning a controversial late-term procedure critics call "partial birth" abortion.
[...]
A federal appeals court had ruled against the government, saying the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Act of 2003 was unconstitutional because it did not provide a health exception to pregnant women facing a medical emergency.
[...]
Abortion rights groups object to the term "partial birth," and even "late-term abortion," saying the procedure is done before the fetus is viable and is performed only in the second or early third trimester, usually within 12 to 15 weeks of the start of pregnancy.
[...]
Since the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion, various states have tried to place restrictions and exceptions on access to the procedure, prompting a string of high court "clarifications" over the years.
South Dakota's state Senate plans to vote Wednesday on a controversial bill to ban abortion in nearly all cases -- except to protect the life of the mother.
[...]
The federal late-term abortion case will likely be argued in the fall.
This case may lead tro the issue of the legality of abortion as a whole. And "late term abortions" apparantly doesn't restrict itself to "partial birth abortions," (which is effed up stuff, if you ask me) but can be as early as 12 weeks in the pregnancy...