The Monkey
The Freeman
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2004
- Messages
- 16,316
- Reaction score
- 16
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eG6X-xtVask[/YOUTUBE]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Youtubes not working for me. Summary anyone please?
Bunch of lawmakers pressing their voting buttons for other lawmakers who are not present. Some guy sitting in a seat leans over and votes the way he wants to for the guy sitting next to him(who isn't present), and the other guys around him. Some get up and walk around racing to press the buttons before others can.
Holy shit, looked like straight out of a Monty Python sketch or something :|
Why is this not headline news?
Aren't non present voters supposed to get an abstain?
I think this deserves a check by the Texas supreme court.
No way! We got oil fields out there, NASA, the Super Bowl, and other crap down there. Still I get what you're saying though.Let's all have a vote on giving Texas back to Mexico.
/me feverishly presses his voting button and everyone's beside him
Let's all have a vote on giving Texas back to Mexico.
/me feverishly presses his voting button and everyone's beside him
Well then you better have an additional plan for getting me the hell out of this country, okay?
Well then you better have an additional plan for getting me the hell out of this country, okay?
Join the line along with impeaching Bush and politicians in general. It's to protect Americans from terrawrists! :dozey:I am very angry right now.
I want all of them put in jail for the next twenty years and complete reform. What the ****, honestly? Isn't that 100% contrary to the Constitution? Luckily we have substantive due process... I hope someone prosecutes them for corruption.
its called canada ... its safer here.
also you mean state right ?......
This is interesting, but I don't think it's quite the horrendous situation the report implies.
First, this isn't being done w/o the knowledge of those who had votes cast for them...it's almost certain taht members make deals for others to cast votes for them. When the outcome of a vote is uncertain,t hough, it's a lot more likely everyone shows up and casts their own votes.
It's against the rules as the report states, but the only time that can be enforced is if someone raises a point of order. members likely aren't going to do that because it means that it will end a practice they probably use a lot themselves.
Is it somewhat unsavory? Yes. Is it as big a scandal as the report states, probably not as members votes are being cast as they wanted them to be cast. It would be a really weird thing if they were having people vote for them against their wishes. Ultimately, I don't think the outcomes of any votes are changing...it just pads the members' attendance records.
thanks for passing this along.
best,
Tim