The new cold war.

clarky003

Tank
Joined
Nov 8, 2003
Messages
6,123
Reaction score
1
Is it possible that the world has been at war ever since the end of the second world war?

It's quitely the most destructive instrument ever created by man. Government's will have no word on it purely to stop mass panic and paranoia, we trundle along in our little bubbles with no real know how on the current state of technological affair's, all we know is the media and idea's on howto capitalise and attempt to make something of ourselves in whatever small way we can, in whatever way we think we know how.

The heavey Iron curtain is slowley opening and its secret's are pouring out.

Russia mysteriously pulled out of the space program while the American's raged on, Infact Russia pulled out for a very good reason... they had discovered something far more wonderful and important to do than racing to the moon. They had discovered howto create and transmit Scalar Waves, A wave form that is hushed by any mainstream scientist, something you would probably get a blank stare for if asked about.

Tesla back at the turn of the 20th century discovered that Oscillation's created by high frequencey Electrical Current emitted a wave form, this wasnt any ordinary wave... it is whats known as a 'static' wave form, the wave didnt seem to travel atall, but merely oscillate through the fabric of space instantaneously detectectable at distance with no delay characteristic's such as radio longitudinal wave signal's.

This Scalar wave form (Stationary electrical wave form) was able to be recieved by tuning a recieving device into the oscillating frequencey of the wave transmitted and reversing the transmitting process , converting into usable electrical energy transmitted wirelessly over distances through the earth and its atmosphere.

The potential for changing frequencey's to interact with matter in localised area's was forseeable by Tesla. and today that's exactley what certain government's posses the means to do today, These are 'scalar electromagnetic weapons'.

The weapons abilities no matter how seemingly far fetched are as follows

.Weather/Atmosphere manipulation
.Directed Implosion's at global distances (Endothermic)
.Directed Explosion's at global distances (Exothermic)
.Earth state altering , Earthquake triggering
.Global scalar radar, allows detailed deep scanning of earth's crust mantle and core
.Induced mind changes (basic mind control)

The waves have positive aspect's too

.Deep scanning of space giving upto date visualisation of the universe
.Manifested manipulation of space time (what you need for warp drive)
.Transmition of electricity wirelessly
.Instantanious communication
.Scalar computers
.Advanced healing

http://www.cheniere.org/articles/Yakuza threat including tsunamis - final w edits 1 website a.doc

http://www.weatherwars.info/index.html
 
Sounds too much like a conspiracy to me, no real solid or visible evidence and lots of fancy technology.
 
clarky003 said:
Is it possible that the world has been at war ever since the end of the second world war?
What I've suggested in another thread, but I was answered with the usual 'Nuking of Hiroshima? Fall of the Berlin wall? What do you call that? OF COURSE we won the war(s)!'

...
 
Foxtrot said:
Sounds too much like a conspiracy to me, no real solid or visible evidence and lots of fancy technology.
Yea I agree.

I'm a big supporter of zero point energy and free energy...but this..is just a load of crap.
 
Foxtrot said:
Sounds too much like a conspiracy to me, no real solid or visible evidence and lots of fancy technology.

I will post Tesla's official patent's later ... and keep adding bits to the thread.
 
Tr0n said:
Yea I agree.

I'm a big supporter of zero point energy and free energy...but this..is just a load of crap.
You are just saying that because the communists are flying scalar waves into your brain, altering you subcounciius thoughts.


Communism is for everyone. :thumbs:
 
That would be kind of cool, but you think they would know if some one found out and the just erase their memory, I mean they can do that if they really found it.
 
This is quite substantial evidence .

Patents

Apparatus for transmition of electrical energy

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v238/Clarky003/71183f7c.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v238/Clarky003/6e803f01.jpg

Art of transmitting electrical energy through the natural mediums

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v238/Clarky003/eda2db1b.jpg

still another fact now of common knowledge is that when electrical waves or oscillations are impressed upon such a conducting-path as a metallic wire reflection takes place under certain conditions from the ends of the wire, and in consequence of the interference and impressed and reflected oscillations the phenomena of "stationary waves" with maxima and minima in definite fixed positions is produced.

Apparatus for transmitting of electrical energy

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v238/Clarky003/71826da4.jpg - note that Tesla had already tried to build this, lacking funding in the end. http://www.ufoarea.com/pictures/wardenclyffe_tower.gif

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v238/Clarky003/e91f2e1c.jpg

-google wardenclyffe for images

all from a man who invented most of what we are allowed to have access to today.

* radio (not Marconi)
o internal linkpalindrome: "I, madam. I made radio! So I dared! Am I mad? Am I?"
* X-rays (not Roentgen)
* vacuum tube amplifier (not Forest)
* flourescent bulb
* neon internal linklights
* speedometer
* automobile ignition system
* radar
* electron microscope
* microwave oven
 
Foxtrot said:
You are just saying that because the communists are flying scalar waves into your brain, altering you subcounciius thoughts.


Communism is for everyone. :thumbs:

Communism isn't bad.....

*the above post was influenced by the guy standing right behind me*
 
clarky003 said:
This is quite substantial evidence .
Art of transmitting electrical energy through the natural mediums

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v238/Clarky003/eda2db1b.jpg

..........

* radio (not Marconi)
o internal linkpalindrome: "I, madam. I made radio! So I dared! Am I mad? Am I?"
* X-rays (not Roentgen)
* vacuum tube amplifier (not Forest)
* flourescent bulb
* neon internal linklights
* speedometer
* automobile ignition system
* radar
* electron microscope
* microwave oven

Quasi-standing waves produced by lightning in the Earth's Resonance Cavity are known as the Schumann Resonances. I did my dissertation/project on the detection and verification of them. They only affect the Earth's magnetic field (100 Volts per metre) slightly, as they are of the order of milivolts - 5 orders of magnitude less, but with the appropriate filter circuitry they aren't so hard to detect.

I suggest you look at:
http://www.iihr.uiowa.edu/projects/schumann/Index.html
http://radio-research.bei.t-online.de/schumann/schumann.htm
http://image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry/ask/q768.html
http://radio-research.bei.t-online.de/project5/schumann1.pdf

Oh you forgot Alternating Current as one of his discoveries.

I'm still not sure what you mean by Scalar waves... can you quote a short qualitative account here, all the websites I look at artfully avoid the question.
It sounds to me they are where the Electric and Magnetic fields are NOT perpendicular to each other, but that goes against classical, quantum and relativistic electrodynamics. Or are they standing waves? I'm reading a lot of conflicting sources.
Any wave can be a standing wave if combining two equal and opposite waves:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_waves
Standing electromagnetic waves are used by scientists all the time, it's not a new phenomena, and even A-Level physics students learn about them.
 
The Russians pulled out of the space race? Really?

What was Mir then? What about the rockets still in use by Russia, used to transport crew and supplies to the ISS?

Doesn't look like a pull-out to me.
 
el Chi said:
We got a guy in a tracksuit up a ladder with a goldfish bowl on his head :)
"Hello Swindon?"(I love Eddie Izzard)

Gotta ask though - why is this in politics? I mean, the title of the thread doesn't even relate to the subject, really...

Yeah, we should have a science and skeptism and theory forum or something. Or it could just go in general discussion.
 
clarky003 said:
Is it possible that the world has been at war ever since the end of the second world war?

It's quitely the most destructive instrument ever created by man. Government's will have no word on it purely to stop mass panic and paranoia, we trundle along in our little bubbles with no real know how on the current state of technological affair's, all we know is the media and idea's on howto capitalise and attempt to make something of ourselves in whatever small way we can, in whatever way we think we know how.

The heavey Iron curtain is slowley opening and its secret's are pouring out.

Russia mysteriously pulled out of the space program while the American's raged on, Infact Russia pulled out for a very good reason... they had discovered something far more wonderful and important to do than racing to the moon. They had discovered howto create and transmit Scalar Waves, A wave form that is hushed by any mainstream scientist, something you would probably get a blank stare for if asked about.

Tesla back at the turn of the 20th century discovered that Oscillation's created by high frequencey Electrical Current emitted a wave form, this wasnt any ordinary wave... it is whats known as a 'static' wave form, the wave didnt seem to travel atall, but merely oscillate through the fabric of space instantaneously detectectable at distance with no delay characteristic's such as radio longitudinal wave signal's.

This Scalar wave form (Stationary electrical wave form) was able to be recieved by tuning a recieving device into the oscillating frequencey of the wave transmitted and reversing the transmitting process , converting into usable electrical energy transmitted wirelessly over distances through the earth and its atmosphere.

The potential for changing frequencey's to interact with matter in localised area's was forseeable by Tesla. and today that's exactley what certain government's posses the means to do today, These are 'scalar electromagnetic weapons'.

The weapons abilities no matter how seemingly far fetched are as follows

.Weather/Atmosphere manipulation
.Directed Implosion's at global distances (Endothermic)
.Directed Explosion's at global distances (Exothermic)
.Earth state altering , Earthquake triggering
.Global scalar radar, allows detailed deep scanning of earth's crust mantle and core
.Induced mind changes (basic mind control)

The waves have positive aspect's too

.Deep scanning of space giving upto date visualisation of the universe
.Manifested manipulation of space time (what you need for warp drive)
.Transmition of electricity wirelessly
.Instantanious communication
.Scalar computers
.Advanced healing

http://www.cheniere.org/articles/Yakuza threat including tsunamis - final w edits 1 website a.doc

http://www.weatherwars.info/index.html


Man you keep promoting this scalar theory too much!
As much as i try to belive you, there is no proof! No visible effect was seen...nothing!? Come on give it a break?! And besides a nuke is already powerful enough, we don't need anything more!

Are you aware how much energy is needed to warp time? nothing we can currently provide, not even with fushion technology! (Ok maby anti-matter)
 
jverne said:
Man you keep promoting this scalar theory too much!
As much as i try to belive you, there is no proof! No visible effect was seen...nothing!? Come on give it a break?! And besides a nuke is already powerful enough, we don't need anything more!

Are you aware how much energy is needed to warp time? nothing we can currently provide, not even with fushion technology! (Ok maby anti-matter)

And the zero point energy theory relies on using energy uncertainty provided by Heisenberg's Uncertainty principle - which means you CAN use zero point energy BUT you need to pay it back in the allocated time, which is related by E x t = h.
 
jverne said:
Man you keep promoting this scalar theory too much!
As much as i try to belive you, there is no proof! No visible effect was seen...nothing!? Come on give it a break?! And besides a nuke is already powerful enough, we don't need anything more!

Are you aware how much energy is needed to warp time? nothing we can currently provide, not even with fushion technology! (Ok maby anti-matter)

Im not promoting it, im meerly informing. This is something im interested in, because if these claims and inventions are a reality, with or without popular opinion on what we think is the norm for EM theories, then it truely shows we as humans really are ignorant to what we consider defines the makeup of our so called 'reality'.

The static wave form is much more than just a resonance if Tesla's observations are correct, you cant simply ignore these things without properly researching into it.. thats all im interested in, no one has proved any of this to be impossible, only theories attempt to do so.. but that is no real grounding to dismiss it either, give it a chance dont crap your pants at the sound of it contradicting defined 'possibilities' or definitions of reality, we are still learning.
Whether it's manipulation of energy, the earth, or whatever, they found something and it's big.
I totally agree, and its nothing to be scared of either, it would just mean redefining and adding to the conventional compendium of our universal knowledge..

Even in the fields most successfully exploited, the ground has only been broken. What has been so far done by electricity is nothing as compared to what the future has in store. It is paradoxical yet true to say that the more we know, the more ignorant we become in the absolute sense, for it is only through enlightenment that we become conscious of our limitations. Precisely one of the most gratifying results of intellectual internal linkevolution is the continuous opening up of new and greater prospects." - Nikola Tesla
which means you CAN use zero point energy BUT you need to pay it back in the allocated time, which is related by E x t = h.

thats according to 3 dimensional EM theory, how can that possibly apply to something that isnt even within our dimensional range of perception, for all we know this 4th dimension of zero point (time) operates on a completely different set of rules.. its impossible to assert anything pre defined in physical reality to something you dont understand let alone something you cant percieve, its confusing because all you get to see are the effect's which can automatically confuse a linear working mind, you have to think outside the box here you have to realise the limitations of the human senses and the erronous possibilities that can be derived from those limitations.

We do not have to discover how to extract usable EM energy from the seething vacuum; every charge in the universe already continuously does that, and it continuously gushes forth real EM energy extracted from its vacuum interaction.All we have to do is uncover and eliminate the continuing limitations our scientists have unwittingly incorporated into the CEM/EE model itself  such as in the ubiquitous closed current loop circuit containing the source dipolarity (the source of flowing potential energy) wired into the external circuit as a load to be continually destroyed  and such as insisting on invariance and Lorentz symmetry of the model because of the “mathematical beauty” in symmetrized equations and an invariant system. By “invariance” one means that no new net observable is allowed to occur when the equations are regauged. To do that requires symmetrical regauging.

On the other hand, by deliberately breaking up the invariance and violating Lorentz symmetry, the resulting modified circuits and systems can indeed rather freely collect excess energy (i.e., asymmetrically regauge themselves) from the active vacuum’s interaction with all the circuit’s charges and the continuous, free flow of real EM energy from every charge. By asymmetrical regauging, a net nonzero, free force field is also produced, and it can then be used to freely dissipate the previously-collected “free potential energy” in external loads to power them almost “for free”, as far as any cost to the operator for the energy dissipated. No law of physics is violated, and no valid law of thermodynamics is violated once the erroneous Second Law is corrected and is no longer the oxymoron and “half law” it presently is.
 
I love the possibilities of exotic technology, however it is almost impossible to find decent sources on the internet, there are many sites that seem to have been created by lunatics.
You know as soon as they start going on about reactors on venus trying to poison the earths atomosphere or a massive underground alien facility that with the US government plans to enslave the human race.

Some sites i find are highly amusing, either the people have a great sense of humor or are completely beyond help.
 
short recoil said:
I love the possibilities of exotic technology, however it is almost impossible to find decent sources on the internet, there are many sites that seem to have been created by lunatics.
You know as soon as they start going on about reactors on venus trying to poison the earths atomosphere or a massive underground alien facility that with the US government plans to enslave the human race.

Some sites i find are highly amusing, either the people have a great sense of humor or are completely beyond help.

I think thats odd aswell, but wouldnt you seem a bit mad if you had seen something that you find hard to comprehend, think about when radio was first discovered, people would of been like... 'wtf? this guys a mad man' which is what the first radio inventors where called.. its heresy, ignorance of a human mind... and its no better now than it was 100 or 200 years ago.
 
clarky003 said:
I think thats odd aswell, but wouldnt you seem a bit mad if you had seen something that you find hard to comprehend, think about when radio was first discovered, people would of been like... 'wtf? this guys a mad man' which is what the first radio inventors where called.. its heresy, ignorance of a human mind... and its no better now than it was 100 or 200 years ago.
I'm open to ideas, i am aware that there is the possibility for many many things we have come no where near understanding, i am also aware that there are many people that come up with a load of crap, either for fame (doing a hoax) or that they are deluded.

It's quite funny when you look back on science, people stating that if you travel over 60mph you will be ripped apart............we can now travel at many times the speed of sound without any harm.

If we were capable of that back then we must be capable of it now, you are right about human ignorance, the best way to get people to stop calling you a loon is to show them evidence and stun them.
 
clarky003 said:
thats according to 3 dimensional EM theory, how can that possibly apply to something that isnt even within our dimensional range of perception, for all we know this 4th dimension of zero point (time) operates on a completely different set of rules.. its impossible to assert anything pre defined in physical reality to something you dont understand let alone something you cant percieve, its confusing because all you get to see are the effect's which can automatically confuse a linear working mind, you have to think outside the box here you have to realise the limitations of the human senses and the erronous possibilities that can be derived from those limitations.

No, it's according to Quantum Electrodynamics theory. And it MUST be true IF conservation of energy laws are not to be violated. The uncertainty of energy must be repaid in the uncertainty of time given by factor planck's constant. This can be explained by Feynman diagrams. You can have virtual particles as mediators of this free energy, but they cannot be observed directly, and hence no energy maybe derived from them.
That is QED, as part of the standard model. The standard model is by no means complete, and I am just stating the theory of it, above. I am open minded to accept plausible arguements against it. I however believe the standard model over fanciful pseudo-arguements.

However:
Classical Electrodynamics is not 3 dimensional either - for example, Faraday's law shows a time varying Magnetic field for a spatially varying Electric field - a 4-dimensional solution.

And this 4th dimension, time is NOT equal to energy. Basic dimensional Analysis will tell you that. Energy is dimensionally equal to [Mass]x[Length]^2x[Time]^-2 BY DEFINITION, so this abstract we have defined as energy is clearly not equivilant to this dimension we have defined as time. Our definition of energy is a superposition of FIVE orders of dimensions, whereas time is a single dimension.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensional_analysis

Maybe Einstein's famous equation E^2 = m^2 c^4 + p c^2 is not complete. It probably needs improvement.
But I can guarentee, by our very own definitions of energy and time, that time does not equal energy.

And maybe Tesla did have a method to transmit energy via electromagnetism. But I bet these nutjobs are way off when it comes to following his work.


Science has two parts: Theoretical and Practical.

For theoretical part, you need Maths and equations which are valid. Assumptions or postulate can be made, but it needs to support a mathematical arguement. It cannot all be assumption. If you don't have experimental evidence, you need to derive from first principles.
For the experimental part you observe, record and measure. Quantify what you see.

Combine these two, you can use experimental data to verify your equations and maths.

So, please do tell, where is either the experimental evidence or mathematical theory behind this?
Standing waves can be described by a simple formula. What is the formula describing the form of this stationary wave?
 
have you been reading up on the new breakthrough's in quantum physic's? they have actually started to discern and accept that there is no real quantum physical attributes to matter, or anything infact, its all 'music' if you will, different energy frequencey's fluctuate out of vaccum, the interactions between the different types of 'music' is what creates the illusion of our solid reality. Simple formula try to describe these waves in terms of physical models, but the very existence outside of the physical realm makes them illusive to attach anything mathmatically accurate to their behaviour,( main stream science is off foot in perpetuated bereaucracey and if it works mathmatically, therefore and then it is how the universe works! of course, we understand now), but dont 'explain' standing waves, neither does any other formula it just try's to quantify its physical effect's.. you can argue that we are studying the tip of a needle through cloth, you cant see the whole picture, so therefore how can you even fully describe what your seeing. You cant, formula and logical equation's are a nautral appreciation for the interpretation of our part of this universe of duality, eveyone with common sense should also see that things work from within to without, explaining the without can give indication to whats going on, but it doesnt quantify the underlying proccess.

I understand your thinking very mathmatically based, almost as if it is a holy grail of knowledge, my point is we didnt create any of this, and in light of our limitations slapping a symbol or label on something isnt what makes it work. The universe is more than mathmatic's, mathmatic's is just a natural form of our inherent appreciation of what we are able to detect in a very limited sense, much more is needed to help comprehend what is taking place from our perspective, enlightenment toward realisation of our limitations as Tesla said is what will allow us to become more at peace and spiritually aligned with our thought processes.

(mass) atoms electrons and all the different dectectable phenomena are infact frequencey's that manifest and seem solid because of our symbiotic and sensory relationship with it all.. being part of it , its all energy, so with this in mind time is energy, its music, a frequencey that manifest's in such a way as we percieve the flow of this 'time' in the way we do. everything is energy!, so saying that time cant be energy is materialistic babble. its like a long string that is clear in view at one end and blurr's out till it seemingly dissapears the further you look down it, and we in conciousness are part of that puzzle, because now realising that without our specific sensory setup different laws may of been created to suit our conditions, then in respect to the two different interpretations of the universe which one is correct? neither, the universe is a multi faceted duality.

I really think we have the wrong end of the stick, modern EM theory is so materialistic, reflecting the human condition of the interpreter (another example of how we are a factor in the puzzle) ,when it is quite obvious there are elements to creation that arnt materialistic atall! so when it comes to labelling these 'dimension's' all of a sudden its something seperate and transformed into something materialistic, when it is not.. our perception decieves us right there! its all part of the one field, the unified field. It only takes some inward perspective to figure that out.. .. out there is in here.

now lets give this a political twist... lets say for conversation's sake that these weapons did exist.. and where covertly in use, if publically brought forward what do you think would happen, positive changes? negative? One nation could literally supress any other anytime they wished so,, they could also keep the peace this way if not abusing the technology,....
 
Tr0n said:
Yea I agree.

I'm a big supporter of zero point energy and free energy...but this..is just a load of crap.

The Scalar things are indeed real.
 
clarky003 said:
have you been reading up on the new breakthrough's in quantum physic's? they have actually started to discern and accept that there is no real quantum physical attributes to matter, or anything infact, its all 'music' if you will, different energy frequencey's fluctuate out of vaccum, the interactions between the different types of 'music' is what creates the illusion of our solid reality. Simple formula try to describe these waves in terms of physical models, but the very existence outside of the physical realm makes them illusive to attach anything mathmatically accurate to their behaviour,( main stream science is off foot in perpetuated bereaucracey and if it works mathmatically, therefore and then it is how the universe works! of course, we understand now), but dont 'explain' standing waves, neither does any other formula it just try's to quantify its physical effect's.. you can argue that we are studying the tip of a needle through cloth, you cant see the whole picture, so therefore how can you even fully describe what your seeing. You cant, formula and logical equation's are a nautral appreciation for the interpretation of our part of this universe of duality, eveyone with common sense should also see that things work from within to without, explaining the without can give indication to whats going on, but it doesnt quantify the underlying proccess.

I understand your thinking very mathmatically based, almost as if it is a holy grail of knowledge, my point is we didnt create any of this, and in light of our limitations slapping a symbol or label on something isnt what makes it work. The universe is more than mathmatic's, mathmatic's is just a natural form of our inherent appreciation of what we are able to detect in a very limited sense, much more is needed to help comprehend what is taking place from our perspective, enlightenment toward realisation of our limitations as Tesla said is what will allow us to become more at peace and spiritually aligned with our thought processes.

..

That's what quantum theory is and has been for over 50 years. It is accepted that an electron cannot be defined as a point particle but rather has a wavefunction. That first postulate of Quantum Mechanics is that a quantum particle is described by a wavefunction which has a single value for each point in space and time. This wavefunction contains all of the information you could wish to know about the particle.
And the mathematics do appreciate the underlying physics of the processes, since they are derived from first principles and in conjunction with experimental evidence.

Einstein didn't just say "E=mc^2!!!", no he sat down and derived it over several years from first principles, from basic underlying physics knowledge.

Maths plays an important part in understanding physics because it is the simplest way of comprehending physics with our feeble minds.
For example, you think you can visualise 10000000000000000000000 metres? I don't think so, you need maths to describe it.
Similarly can you imagine a femtometer? It's too small to comprehend.

The need to quantify things has been a human trait since the dawn of time. Look at the economy, we rate things in terms of tax dollars. The amount you work will more or less correlate to the amount you earn. If we didn't have this system we couldn't rationalise how to pay work effectively.
The same goes for scientists.

Oh and maths has worked out pretty well in NASA with the launching of spacecraft and use of telescopes.
Engineers use mathematical models to design things too.
How do you think the new Airbus 380 was designed? Mathematical modelling of the stream functions in the aerodynamics.

I really think we have the wrong end of the stick, modern EM theory is so materialistic, reflecting the human condition of the interpreter (another example of how we are a factor in the puzzle) ,when it is quite obvious there are elements to creation that arnt materialistic atall! so when it comes to labelling these 'dimension's' all of a sudden its something seperate and transformed into something materialistic, when it is not.. our perception decieves us right there! its all part of the one field, the unified field. It only takes some inward perspective to figure that out.. .. out there is in here.

now lets give this a political twist... lets say for conversation's sake that these weapons did exist.. and where covertly in use, if publically brought forward what do you think would happen, positive changes? negative? One nation could literally supress any other anytime they wished so,, they could also keep the peace this way if not abusing the technology,..

How much do you know modern EM theory? Please explain your understanding.
It goes a lot deeper into the Quantum domain than you seem to give it credit for, it's changed a lot since the 1890s situation which you call "Modern" physics.
Please actually study some contemporary physics before you critisise everything about it.

(mass) atoms electrons and all the different dectectable phenomena are infact frequencey's that manifest and seem solid because of our symbiotic and sensory relationship with it all.. being part of it , its all energy, so with this in mind time is energy, its music, a frequencey that manifest's in such a way as we percieve the flow of this 'time' in the way we do. everything is energy!, so saying that time cant be energy is materialistic babble. its like a long string that is clear in view at one end and blurr's out till it seemingly dissapears the further you look down it, and we in conciousness are part of that puzzle, because now realising that without our specific sensory setup different laws may of been created to suit our conditions, then in respect to the two different interpretations of the universe which one is correct? neither, the universe is a multi faceted duality.

Energy is a SECOND ORDER RATE OF CHANGE WITH RESPECT TO TIME.

Our definition of energy is a force taken over a certain distance. This does NOT translate as a time. Dancing around waving your hands in the air proclaiming you know the truth isn't going to change that. Neither is having a vague understanding of the real issue.

Frequency relates to energy via the Planck law, but it's exact defintion is NOT energy, rather it is a rate, which can be interpreted as having an ENERGY equivilance. This does NOT correspond to the statement energy is time. Rather you should say "The oscillation of this quanta with respect to time corresponds to an energy proportonalised through the speed of light"
Actually, if anything may be deduced, time must be related to the INVERSE energy. But that doesn't say anything about the dimensionality of time itself.
In the assumption of claiming you can take energy from time itself, YOU are the one thinking too materialistically. Nobody claimed energy was tangible, except for you when said you could tap into time itself as though it were material. The dimension of time is abstract, not tangible.

Please, before you critisise modern physics, I suggest you study it first.
It's like me critising Shakespeare without actually having read anything, just having read the reviews of it.

Tell you what:
Present your arguement to these people -
http://physicsforums.com/index.php
They're more likely to listen to you than the politics section of HL2.net.

You said
it would be interesting to email a government official with this too, see what they have to say ,lol or even a military official.
Well this is a step below that. If you can convince them maybe you can talk to the government officials.
 
kirovman said:
That's what quantum theory is and has been for over 50 years. It is accepted that an electron cannot be defined as a point particle but rather has a wavefunction. That first postulate of Quantum Mechanics is that a quantum particle is described by a wavefunction which has a single value for each point in space and time. This wavefunction contains all of the information you could wish to know about the particle.
And the mathematics do appreciate the underlying physics of the processes, since they are derived from first principles and in conjunction with experimental evidence.

Einstein didn't just say "E=mc^2!!!", no he sat down and derived it over several years from first principles, from basic underlying physics knowledge.

Maths plays an important part in understanding physics because it is the simplest way of comprehending physics with our feeble minds.
For example, you think you can visualise 10000000000000000000000 metres? I don't think so, you need maths to describe it.
Similarly can you imagine a femtometer? It's too small to comprehend.

The need to quantify things has been a human trait since the dawn of time. Look at the economy, we rate things in terms of tax dollars. The amount you work will more or less correlate to the amount you earn. If we didn't have this system we couldn't rationalise how to pay work effectively.
The same goes for scientists.

Oh and maths has worked out pretty well in NASA with the launching of spacecraft and use of telescopes.
Engineers use mathematical models to design things too.
How do you think the new Airbus 380 was designed? Mathematical modelling of the stream functions in the aerodynamics.



How much do you know modern EM theory? Please explain your understanding.
It goes a lot deeper into the Quantum domain than you seem to give it credit for, it's changed a lot since the 1890s situation which you call "Modern" physics.
Please actually study some contemporary physics before you critisise everything about it.



Energy is a SECOND ORDER RATE OF CHANGE WITH RESPECT TO TIME.

Our definition of energy is a force taken over a certain distance. This does NOT translate as a time. Dancing around waving your hands in the air proclaiming you know the truth isn't going to change that. Neither is having a vague understanding of the real issue.

Frequency relates to energy via the Planck law, but it's exact defintion is NOT energy, rather it is a rate, which can be interpreted as having an ENERGY equivilance. This does NOT correspond to the statement energy is time. Rather you should say "The oscillation of this quanta with respect to time corresponds to an energy proportonalised through the speed of light"
Actually, if anything may be deduced, time must be related to the INVERSE energy. But that doesn't say anything about the dimensionality of time itself.
In the assumption of claiming you can take energy from time itself, YOU are the one thinking too materialistically. Nobody claimed energy was tangible, except for you when said you could tap into time itself as though it were material. The dimension of time is abstract, not tangible.

Please, before you critisise modern physics, I suggest you study it first.
It's like me critising Shakespeare without actually having read anything, just having read the reviews of it.

Tell you what:
Present your arguement to these people -
http://physicsforums.com/index.php
They're more likely to listen to you than the politics section of HL2.net.

You said
Well this is a step below that. If you can convince them maybe you can talk to the government officials.


sorry clarky, but kirovman has much more arguments, so for now i don't belive any of this scalar thingy. It seems that everything you found about scalar weapons it almost made on purpose without any theoretical background, only sentences or pictures that vaguely intriges you into reading it!

And yes you should go to a physics forum, we don't have enough knowlege to contribute to what you are looking for!
 
actually the weather control device does extist.


in alaska they built a mass radio telescope, made up of many smaller uints. these work by either shooting out micro or radio waves into space. aparently these waves heat up the upper atmosphere, and have changed the course of a jet stream. i dead serious. while moving a jet stream would seem major, the telescope was used only for a short time. the only major weather flux was and increase of tornados that year in teh Great Planes states, with a rise of about 20%. dead serious.

even though this was an accident, weird stuff like this can happen
 
Back
Top