The system of Military Corporatism

15357

Companion Cube
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
15,209
Reaction score
23
Ok, here's something I wrote today at school, a free-write thing. Its translated so some of the parts may be distorted. And i hadn't had time to organize it correctly. :E


The System of Military Corporatism
by Numbers, your friendly maniac from around the globe. :p

Military Corporatism is a system (devised by me, hehe) which capitalizes on the security, safety, stability, and the prosperity of society. Because of its ways and ideals, political freedoms and some civil rights may be.. hindered, although the economy would be a free-market one. In this system, crime, a problem in all nations today, will be largely handled by the military police. Criminal punishment would be a bit harsher but without the sentence of execution, excepting that of crimes such as treason andthe incitement of social unrest. Criminals will no longer leech off the system, but instead work in labor education camps, and provide a cheap working force for corporations and paying back society for their crimes. Also, in this system, large corporation will be the backbone of the nation, and recieve multiple benefits such as cut taxes. Labor unions, strikes and protesting will be illegal for the most part. Healthcare and education will be the secondary priorities, next to defense and law and order. However, public healthcare will only be available to the poorer ctizens and soldiers. Hospitals will be owned and run by corporations.

The goverment will be centralized to Military Command(or some other organisation like that). Most nations today divide their power to 3, but the tripod is the most unstable political structure of all, and dividing it to even more groups will result in power loss. So, it'll be centralized, for stability and effectivness of goverment. Goverment control will be with mainly the support by corporations, military power, the 'education' of young students (some of you call it 'brainwashing' :/), and the re-education of.. the.. somewhat unruly. Soldiers, would recieve numerous benefits, as to gain their support to the goverment. Because the goverment must capitalize on security to achieve the shared goal of prosperity, it must be almost continually at war. An enemy would install fear into the minds of citiznes, and that would be very effective in keeping them in line, even more than oppression (read 1984 for details :p). Since military might is largel needed, students will learn military sciences in school at the age of 12, and be eligible for conscription in emergencies or just normal recruiting.

Comments, flames, death threats, questions? :)
 
apart from your appalling lack of human empathy i have one major problem with your treatise - the military are by their nature the most rigid inflexible and conservative branch of society by design (the must remain constant in character regardless of who is in command etc.) then your nation is FUBAR leading to an ever increasing marginal rate of societal depreciation leading directly to the very anarchy that you fear so much
 
Criminal punishment would be a bit harsher but without the sentence of execution, excepting that of crimes such as treason andthe incitement of social unrest

You're kidding right? Like somehow incitement of social unrest or treason are more wicked and deserving of death sentence than brutal rape or murder?
 
john3571000 said:
apart from your appalling lack of human empathy i have one major problem with your treatise - the military are by their nature the most rigid inflexible and conservative branch of society by design (the must remain constant in character regardless of who is in command etc.) then your nation is FUBAR leading to an ever increasing marginal rate of societal depreciation leading directly to the very anarchy that you fear so much
Yes... but I don't get you...... why would it cause societal depreciation?

You're kidding right?

Kind of.
Like somehow incitement of social unrest or treason are more wicked and deserving of death sentence than brutal rape or murder?

Of course not. But making rapists and murderers work 14 hours a day in factories sounds kinda better. :p
 
john said:
appalling lack of human empathy
john said:
appalling lack of human empathy
john said:
appalling lack of human empathy
john said:
appalling lack of human empathy
john said:
appalling lack of human empathy
john said:
appalling lack of human empathy
john said:
appalling lack of human empathy

shaving7.jpg
 
holy shit sulkdodds, I could hardly stay upright I was laughing so hard. :laugh:

=D
 
Look at the Egyptian Empire. They were ultra conservative faschists with a stagnant society and their empire lasted for thousands of years. It only really started to crumble because they sucked at making iron.
 
I am intreuged by your ideas, how do I subscribe to your newsletter?:P
 
To count as a "Corporatism", you've got to have a company running the place, or something. Otherwise, you've just got a Military dictatorship.

-Angry Lawyer
 
I'm also upset that Sulk didn't give me credit for the shaving-foam man.

-Angry Lawyer
 
wrong section? there shall be no mention of anything of real importance in the off topic section!

*turns away*
 
This idea is bizarre. Truly bizarre.

If you ran the military like a corporation you would run into some problems winning on the battlefield... I can see why somebody could be confused, because both are ways of organizing large numbers of people.

Oh, to the person who said the military isn't flexible, don't be silly. If your military can't adapt to changing situations rapidly (or even pre-empt changes!) then you are going to fail miserably. See the Allies, early WWII.
 
Angry Lawyer said:
To count as a "Corporatism", you've got to have a company running the place, or something. Otherwise, you've just got a Military dictatorship.

-Angry Lawyer

it's called fascism numbers not military corporatism ..that's this

Military-industrial complex

I only put corporatism to make it longer . :P

This idea is bizarre. Truly bizarre.

If you ran the military like a corporation you would run into some problems winning on the battlefield... I can see why somebody could be confused, because both are ways of organizing large numbers of people.

Oh, to the person who said the military isn't flexible, don't be silly. If your military can't adapt to changing situations rapidly (or even pre-empt changes!) then you are going to fail miserably. See the Allies, early WWII.

Everything except the military is run by corporations, and the military runs the state.

appalling lack of human empathy

:(

You scare me Numbers .

W00t! 5th person to say that about my ideas! :E



btw, Sulky scares me.
 
That sounds like a regular military dictatorship to me, Numbers.
 
Jintor said:
That sounds like a regular military dictatorship to me, Numbers.

But now it has a name. Albit a kinda wrong one.

Edit: Rename - Uber-Capitalistic Militarism
 
You COULD move to Myanmar and get most of what you posted. Except the corporate bits.

-Angry Lawyer
 
Hmmmm, Numbers, get in touch, i think we can take control of Britain like this :E
 
DeusExMachinia said:
Have you ever read the Prince, Numbers? I think you'd like it.

A book? Whats it about?

Evo said:
Hmmmm, Numbers, get in touch, i think we can take control of Britain like this :E

WE SHALL PREVAIL! :E
 
Raziaar said:
You're kidding right? Like somehow incitement of social unrest or treason are more wicked and deserving of death sentence than brutal rape or murder?

Whats worse for rapists? Death or cutting off his todger :thumbs:
 
Back
Top