Dynasty
Space Core
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2004
- Messages
- 4,976
- Reaction score
- 17
Just watched Enemy Of The State with a friend to kill a few hours, and the end brought up a bit of a debate between us. But its hard to argue with women so ill ask you guys.
'How do you draw the line between protection of national security, obviously the governments need to secure intelligence data, and the protection of civil liberties; particularly the sanctaty of my home, you have no right to come into my home'.
Thats the end line. So what do you guys think. Should the government be keeping tabs on us for a sake of national security, monitoring our calls and emails etc etc, and who's monitoring the monitors?
Now this is all probably some huge over reaction as ive just watched a film about it, but it has a point wether you chose to believe it or not I guess.
Im kinda torn. Yes governments need to monitor us to keep the peace, but at the same time, they dont have the right to watch our lives surely?
'How do you draw the line between protection of national security, obviously the governments need to secure intelligence data, and the protection of civil liberties; particularly the sanctaty of my home, you have no right to come into my home'.
Thats the end line. So what do you guys think. Should the government be keeping tabs on us for a sake of national security, monitoring our calls and emails etc etc, and who's monitoring the monitors?
Now this is all probably some huge over reaction as ive just watched a film about it, but it has a point wether you chose to believe it or not I guess.
Im kinda torn. Yes governments need to monitor us to keep the peace, but at the same time, they dont have the right to watch our lives surely?