Neo_Kuja
Spy
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2004
- Messages
- 476
- Reaction score
- 0
So in the last few days the "Three Strikes" legislation has been passed in New Zealand for serious crimes such as aggravated robbery, sexual assault and murder. Any person convicted and judged guilty of any of the three crimes (separate times - that is, after separate jail terms) above now has the following schedule :
First Offense : Normal Sentence (1/3rd of maximum time with parole)
Second Offense : Maximum Sentence (No Parole)
Third Offense : Maximum Sentence - For Murder, "Life" means "Life Term"
[Source]
For Example :
Interestingly, a good portion of public opinion on the street is supportive of the law (see the comments section of the aforementioned newspaper for some), while newspapers and other sources appear to be quite critical of the law - "More danger of Prison Guard Murder" and the like, due to hardened criminals on their third go having nothing to lose. The labour party (equivalent to the American Democrat party) is also having a field day due to the law being "ineffective" and not being as harsh as was originally intended.
Nevermind that rehabilitation has been ineffective at curing serial offenders that continually get out early due to our "fair" parole system (Burton, Bell, Kururiki, etc).
Opinions, anyone ?
First Offense : Normal Sentence (1/3rd of maximum time with parole)
Second Offense : Maximum Sentence (No Parole)
Third Offense : Maximum Sentence - For Murder, "Life" means "Life Term"
[Source]
For Example :
Under the proposed a law, a 20-year-old sentenced next year to four years for robbery, would be eligible for parole after serving a third of the sentence.
If he committed another robbery and was sentenced to five years he would have to serve all five years in prison.
If he committed a third robbery and carried a baseball bat, making it an aggravated robbery, he would have to be sentenced to 14 years and would serve 14 years.
Interestingly, a good portion of public opinion on the street is supportive of the law (see the comments section of the aforementioned newspaper for some), while newspapers and other sources appear to be quite critical of the law - "More danger of Prison Guard Murder" and the like, due to hardened criminals on their third go having nothing to lose. The labour party (equivalent to the American Democrat party) is also having a field day due to the law being "ineffective" and not being as harsh as was originally intended.
Nevermind that rehabilitation has been ineffective at curing serial offenders that continually get out early due to our "fair" parole system (Burton, Bell, Kururiki, etc).
Opinions, anyone ?