CptStern
suckmonkey
- Joined
- May 5, 2004
- Messages
- 10,303
- Reaction score
- 62
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
it looks like CG to me... I think at that size the liquids wouldn't splatter that much.
Does it really matter if it's fake or not?
The fluid physics looked fine to me.
Does it really matter if it's fake or not?
The production team shot high-speed footage of insects being hit by droplets of coloured viscous liquid. Maquettes were then created to match the shapes and positions of the ‘heroic’ insects and painted blue. Real pies were then thrown at the maquettes and shot at high speed. The biggest challenge was creating enough light to achieve the required exposure. To ensure the insects were comfortable and under no threat of heat exhaustion, the light could only be switched on for up to 3 seconds at a time. Even with the specialist equipment, the depth of field was literally never more than a few millimetres, meaning that the insects only had to move minutely before going out of focus.
If it's fake the coolness factor decreases by roughly 100%. Then it's just a cg render, boring.
Not comparing constructing a tiny catapult and recording the pelting of small insects with pies to landing a human on Mars.
but the point is that it's something amazing they've created/accomplished and that's why it's cool.
Well good thing
What? I did no such thing. Who the hell are you even talking to?you pointlessly split my post into 3 parts
What? What was? I think you accidentally deleted part of this sentence.even though it was all part of one coherent point
Disagreed about what? Your post doesn't make any sense, we're not even arguing over anything.you could have just simply said you disagreed
Huh? Is this part of your sentence from before? Man, you really need to proof read your posts before submitting them.with.