US seeks to shield it's interrogators

Glo-Boy

Newbie
Joined
Nov 8, 2003
Messages
1,262
Reaction score
0
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060809/pl_nm/rights_crime_usa_dc

Looks like the Bush administration doesn't want to deal with imprisoning new war criminals, so they're f-cking revising the War Crimes act to narrow down the list of offenses. OH GOOD.

Not that I side with the prisoners, you dumbass, self-congratulatory bush lovers, we're just treating them like we're idiots. You wouldn't see this sort of treatment from a country that wasn't acting on cowboy ethics.
 
Not that I side with the prisoners, you dumbass, self-congratulatory bush lovers, we're just treating them like we're idiots. You wouldn't see this sort of treatment from a country that wasn't acting on cowboy ethics.

I wonder if you have any other motives for posting this. No, couldn't be. Not when you're so articulate and impartial as demonstrated in the quote above. By the way, where are you from then? I'm sure I can whip up a stereotype insult to make you feel uncomfortable.
 
I wonder if you have any other motives for posting this. No, couldn't be. Not when you're so articulate and impartial as demonstrated in the quote above. By the way, where are you from then? I'm sure I can whip up a stereotype insult to make you feel uncomfortable.

Says the man with the disturbing Joseph Stalin quote in his signature.
 
Let's get some quotage up in here. From the posted article:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Political appointees, CIA officers and former military personnel would not face prosecution for humiliating or degrading wartime prisoners under amendments to a war crimes law drafted by the Bush administration, the Washington Post reported on Wednesday.

Only 10 specific categories of illegal acts against wartime detainees, including torture, murder, rape and hostage-taking, could be prosecuted under the amendments, it said.

The list [of prosecutable acts] would not include the kinds of humiliating acts, like forced nakedness, used at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison which fall short of torture but are nevertheless barred by the Geneva Conventions as "outrages upon personal dignity," it reported.

Just another addendum to the list of Bush administration atrocities. Siiigh...
 
Says the man with... I'm not even gonna mention yours. Don't you feel stupid when I bring the hammer of irony on you like that?

lol ok ummm wtf are you talking about? How did you bring down the "hammer of irony" on me? Please explain, fully.
 
In that you have a GWB quote that's saying similarly shitty things.
 
Back
Top