Voter Fraud in New Hampshire primary?

[CptStern]

I just spent the last two hours putting together a spreadsheet of the Democratic results of the NH primary for each town with almost all but a few towns reporting, and the results were somewhat surprising

I say "somewhat" because some people will say this entirely foreseeable. What the informal statistics show is that Hillary Clinton received a 4.5% boost in towns using Diebold voting machines compared to towns that didn't. Meanwhile, Obama was hurt in these towns showing a 2.5% decrease in the Diebold towns.

http://benmoseley.blogspot.com/2008/01/do-nh-primary-statistics-show-election.html


how to hack a Diebold voting machine:

http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=414916629&size=l

 

[Sedako]

Kucinich has requested a hand vote recount:

http://www.newsobserver.com/1566/story/873929.html

 

[Andrew LB]

http://benmoseley.blogspot.com/2008/01/do-nh-primary-statistics-show-election.html


how to hack a Diebold voting machine:

http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=414916629&size=l

Well what did you expect from the Clinton Political-Machine???


But until this is proven in a court of law that the vote was fraudulently altered, i'll reserve any further speculation.

We all remember the MASSIVE amount of people who claimed the Bush Administration commited voter fraud, voter intimidation, etc.... yet NOTHING was ever proven to even occur in a court of law.

 

[CptStern]

Well what did you expect from the Clinton Political-Machine???

:upstare: not to be rude but stfu ..partisan bullshit is so annoying ..I/many people here dont care about either party

But until this is proven in a court of law that the vote was fraudulently altered, i'll reserve any further speculation.

except to say that it's Hilary, what do people expect? (obviously for her to bite the heads off babies)

 

[No Limit]

Well what did you expect from the Clinton Political-Machine???


But until this is proven in a court of law that the vote was fraudulently altered, i'll reserve any further speculation.

We all remember the MASSIVE amount of people who claimed the Bush Administration commited voter fraud, voter intimidation, etc.... yet NOTHING was ever proven to even occur in a court of law.

For your information nothing was ever investigated in regards to the 2004 election even though there was a clear discrepancy between exit polls and the actual results on e-voting machines. Yet for hand counted ballots the exit polls were dead accurate. Funny isn't it. But let me guess, you know somebody that was directly involved in this and he told you otherwise?

I'll stop feeding the troll for now, back to the point. There is a huge problem with these machines. Why they haven't been banned yet is amazing to me. Kucinich is saying he wants a recount but really what he should be doing is introducing legislation to ban these machines, I mean its not like his party has the majority or anything .

 

[Andrew LB]

:upstare: not to be rude but stfu ..partisan bullshit is so annoying ..I/many people here dont care about either party



except to say that it's Hilary, what do people expect? (obviously for her to bite the heads off babies)

Haha. If the accusations of voter fraud to prove to be true, you can guarantee that it was either committed by the Clinton's themselves, their organization, or a Clinton supporter (but with no direct ties to Clinton herself).

 

[Sedako]

Election officials don't seem to care that Diebold counters are inaccurate and have security issues. I really hope a vote recount does show very different results. One step closer to eliminating the damn things.

 

[CptStern]

Haha. If the accusations of voter fraud to prove to be true, you can guarantee that it was either committed by the Clinton's themselves, their organization, or a Clinton supporter (but with no direct ties to Clinton herself).

even though there are discrepencies in the republican voter count as well? ...so Clinton not only tampered with her votes but those of the other party as well ..but I'll take your word for it ..it HAS to be clinton cuz ..well she eats babies as did her husband ..george Bush on the other hand is a ****ing saint who should be canonized ..this is what partisan politics has shown me

is partisanship a mental disease? because from where I'm sitting it certainly seems to be the case

 

[Andrew LB]

For your information nothing was ever investigated in regards to the 2004 election even though there was a clear discrepancy between exit polls and the actual results on e-voting machines. Yet for hand counted ballots the exit polls were dead accurate. Funny isn't it. But let me guess, you know somebody that was directly involved in this and he told you otherwise?

There were countless investigations in 2004 regarding voter fraud, voter intimidation, etc. The facts of the matter are that NOTHING was able to be proven in a court of law, thus the issue was never further discussed by the main stream media because it would have only made all the accusers to look like a bunch of idiots.

And FYI.... the exit polls were NOT dead accurate with the hand counted ballots. I cannot believe that you just made that up. For almost the entire country, the hand counted ballots were almost exactly on par with the e-voting machines. There were only a few scattered counties in states like North Carolina and in particular, Franklin County Indiana where whenever a voter selected the democratic candidate John Kerry, the vote would automatically register as a libertarian candidate.

http://www2.indystar.com/articles/1/194039-4421-098.html

I'll stop feeding the troll for now, back to the point. There is a huge problem with these machines. Why they haven't been banned yet is amazing to me. Kucinich is saying he wants a recount but really what he should be doing is introducing legislation to ban these machines, I mean its not like his party has the majority or anything .

I agree with you 100%. Talk is cheap, it takes money to buy whisky.

Since we agree on something for once, beers on me! :cheers:

 

[kathaksung]

This is a covert totalitarian country. They select president by rigged election. (They control the voting office by intelligence) and justify the result by fake poll. (They manipulate public opinion by media)

Quote, "Voter Fraud Against Paul Confirmed in Sutton, N.H

By admin | January 8, 2008
Kurt Nimmo January 8, 2008

According to a http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=82909 this evening on the Ron Paul Forums, vote fraud occurred in Sutton, New Hampshire:

Sutton with 100% reporting reported 0 votes for paul but poster in Sutton posted:
My mom, aunt, and dad all voted for RP today in my hometown, My mom and aunt both work passing out ballots, and checking them off. I just looked at the politico map and it says their town has ZERO votes for Ron. Now i know that there isn’t corruption on voting in that little town, so where they reported it must be. What do I do, anyone know???

http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=655#more-655

Greenville Vote Discrepancy SAME as Sutton <http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=754>
By AnalogDan | January 9, 2008

We have caught Sutton red-handed. However, there are other other tonwships that have been reporting 0 votes, including Greenville, as sourced here:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/county/#val=NHREP9

Moreover, when Sutton had been found out, they quickly added 31 votes, and cited ‘human error.’ What is their excuse for this source, now showing Greenville at 25 votes:

http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=news0807

 

[Ridge]

Lets not forget that all the Diebold votes to Ron Paul were simply tossed out...which is total BS...Paul has had my vote from the start...