WalMart-junior-panties-suggest-that-your-genitals-are-better-than-credit-cards

VictimOfScience

VictimOfScience

Newbie
Joined
Feb 24, 2005
Messages
7,020
Reaction score
1
Wow. I just don't get it. Censor movies and videogames and not even carry some of these items and instead choose to stock panties that young girls will wear that suggest well...you see the point here.

yayimahooker.jpg


While we can't disagree with the strict literal interpretation of the message, perhaps Walmart should consider printing it on a wallet, rather than on panties meant for teenage girls. The whole prostitution angle is clouding the message of fiscal responsibility. Hey, it's just a suggestion.
Click to expand...
Source.

Isn't there some sort of law against this? Is Wal Mart too big to challenge? How long until we can buy child brides at a Super Wal Mart??
 
Wow. Just wow.

EDIT: Apparently they yanked them because of parent complaints. Shouldn't have been put out in the first place. Though apparently in the ass they said, "When you have Santa". So I'm assuming Santa is the whore name for John's.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,316580,00.html

Fox.
 
"There's nothing quite like telling adolescent girls that they don't need to worry about finances since they have their very own moneypot between their legs"
Click to expand...
That's nothing they don't find out on their own.
 
$2.96 God Damned thats a lot of money!!
 
you're about as misogynistic as they come Darkside. did a woman kick you puppy?
 
Society has been going downhill since we decided to wear clothes
 
It's just the truth, Stern.

Also, something else that gets me about this story is there hasn't been an uproar to get rid of shirts that say "Hot" or pants that say "Juicy" across the butt marketed to eight-year-olds. But once it's on panties HOLD THE PHONE. There are still mothers buying strapless halters and short shorts for children, but oh man, sexualizing panties, that's too far. It's like, "Who do you think let it get to this point?"
 
Vegeta897 said:
Those are some ugly panties.
Click to expand...

Nobody is telling you to wear them.

Darkside55 said:
It's just the truth, Stern.

Also, something else that gets me about this story is there hasn't been an uproar to get rid of shirts that say "Hot" or pants that say "Juicy" across the butt marketed to eight-year-olds. But once it's on panties HOLD THE PHONE. There are still mothers buying strapless halters and short shorts for children, but oh man, sexualizing panties, that's too far. It's like, "Who do you think let it get to this point?"
Click to expand...

Juicy huh? They should embroider a spoon shape right next to it.
 
i guess we're too busy playing video games to realize children are now adults and all the adults are acting childish
 
"This is a pair of panties. Exactly how nice to Santa would the girl have to be in order to get stuff?"
Click to expand...

:|

Looks like someone wants to twist the message to fit their needs here...
 
Something else to consider: who's going to see it. If people (ie boys) are seeing it, I thing the message is hardly worth arguing anymore.
 
Emporius said:
Something else to consider: who's going to see it. If people (ie boys) are seeing it, I thing the message is hardly worth arguing anymore.
Click to expand...

Men who shouldn't be fathers, but are.
 
I think that is less of an issue, than it is that the girl owns them and will be seeing the phrase everytime she sees or wears them.
 
it should write on them "I'M A DEVOUT CATHOLIC, SORRY"
 
who buy underwear whit stuff written on it? seriously who?

"look at my new underpants whit "shit" writted on the back lol"
 
<RJMC> said:
who buy underwear whit stuff written on it? seriously who?

"look at my new underpants whit "shit" writted on the back lol"
Click to expand...

A long time ago I had underwear that said "I <3 NY".

Didn't get me anything though.
 
Darkside55 said:
It's just the truth, Stern.

Also, something else that gets me about this story is there hasn't been an uproar to get rid of shirts that say "Hot" or pants that say "Juicy" across the butt marketed to eight-year-olds. But once it's on panties HOLD THE PHONE. There are still mothers buying strapless halters and short shorts for children, but oh man, sexualizing panties, that's too far. It's like, "Who do you think let it get to this point?"
Click to expand...

But, panties touch the vagina. And people don't want to think about anything touching underaged vagina. Because then they'll think pedo thoughts.

touching vaginas
 
HL2.net has already screwed me in that regard. There was something you could type into google that relates to CP and my forum name comes up in the results. I made a joke about pitz with underaged chicks and now my name is forever connected with illegal content on the internet.
 
What about working the return register for all these used panties?

AWwwwwwwwwwww YEEEEEEAaaaa. Smells better than Viet Nam and Barbasol gel, son.



EDIT: Sorry, I thought this was off-topic. I really don't think the underwear is classy. :thumbs down: I don't think clothing with 'cute' slogans is sexy, it's just childish. But yeah, the whole selling your body. Is that even in style? I guess some young ladies want to prove something and show they are now sexually active.

AaAwwww Righttttt
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top