Who says one person cant make a difference?

Good for him. :cheers:

The new style is just too different. I like the old characters as well.
 
haha, What the hell was Warner Bros. tripping out on when they came up with those concepts, and where can I find me some?
 
good for him.. I guess online petitions do work.. when using a child as a figurehead to get the whole "awwwwwwwww" vote in.
 
yeah I saw these new looney tunes on the news, what a joke, I think "buzz bunny" has laser eyes...it just doesn't work even though laser eyes are sweet.
I hope the WB goes out of business :)
 
One person can make a difference but it is in the interests of the world that they generally don't, why should one person make a difference when there are 6,100,000,000 other people to consider.
 
Razor said:
One person can make a difference but it is in the interests of the world that they generally don't, why should one person make a difference when there are 6,100,000,000 other people to consider.

Because we aren't a hive mind. Someone has to lead the way, otherwise we never get anywhere.

xLostx said:
I hope the WB goes out of business :)

I think the world economy would have to collapse before WB, and the larger corporation they are part of, goes bankrupt.
 
xLostx said:
I hope the WB goes out of business :)

Let me tell you it would take more than just that show to put them out of business.
 
Read the article yesterday. The dude simply rules.
 
Reminds me of how I battled Microsoft for control of the Universe... and won!
... now...wait, that was just a dream. :|
 
the new bugs bunny looks like something done whyen the artist was on crack.
 
So we can put the tally of the amount of times an online petition has worked to ||

:)
 
Although I don't know if just one person can really make a difference.

One person and a petition of over 80,000 signatures though.....
 
Razor said:
One person can make a difference but it is in the interests of the world that they generally don't, why should one person make a difference when there are 6,100,000,000 other people to consider.

tell that to ..........golda myer, Mohandas Gandhi, mother theresa, Rosa Parks, Martin Luther king, Alexander Fleming (penicillin), Norman Bethune, Clara Barton, Pablo Picasso, Jackie Robinson, John Humphries etc etc etc
 
i suppose one person can make a difference, its possible.

no doubt about it
 
CptStern said:
tell that to ..........golda myer, Mohandas Gandhi, mother theresa, Rosa Parks, Martin Luther king, Alexander Fleming (penicillin), Norman Bethune, Clara Barton, Pablo Picasso, Jackie Robinson, John Humphries etc etc etc

lol, somehow comparing the looney tunes kid to that list of people seems funny.

You've got people that did everything from promoting world peace, to opposing segregation, and then you've got some 11-year old preventing a mass media coorporation from turning a cartoon legend into something dark and scary. :P
 
Farrowlesparrow said:
Because we aren't a hive mind. Someone has to lead the way, otherwise we never get anywhere.



I think the world economy would have to collapse before WB, and the larger corporation they are part of, goes bankrupt.


And what if a very small, vocal, minority want stem cell research banned and outlawed...what about the very small, vocal, minority who attack scientists who engage in life saving medical research where some aspects are tested on animals.

One person, like Stern was hinting at can make a case, but when they start driving it through against everyone else, one person should not make the difference when most other people don't want them to make a difference.

edit: just to make the above point more clear, 1 person should encourage the masses to make a difference and have the masses to get the point across. But one person can't just come in and make a difference when they don't have the support of the masses or the masses have no idea what is going on or don't care anyway.


This little boy isn't "1 person making a difference", it is 1 person who is allowing lots of people, with his website and petition, to make a difference, even though they are ignorant to how good/bad the new cartoon is and has only seen limited artwork, when Warner Bros has clearly stated in the news report that their target audience seems to be very excited when they were shown test screenings of the new characters.
 
Razor you're just getting into semantics(or whatever the word is), its really not worth it.
 
Murray_H said:
So we can put the tally of the amount of times an online petition has worked to ||

:)
Well a Thief 3 level editor got released because of a petition... so |||

What's the first |?
 
I think I'll have to agree with Brian on this one:
Brian Clevinger said:
People keep sending me this link. If modern living has devolved you to the point where clicking links is too much of an effort, let me give you the short version:

Warner Brothers figured out that Loonatics was the worst idea in the world. No news whether or not it's occured to them that the idea is about seven years past its xtreme prime. So they've cooked up this saccharine little PR stunt to make it look like they care about the fans and used that as an excuse to modify the goddawful Loonatics designs instead of admitting that there was clearly no money to be milked out of the idea when everyone on planet Earth hated it. Of course, there's no images for the "new" designs, almost as if there aren't any, because Warner Bros. is backpedalling like crazy on this idea.
 
Back
Top