who will win

edfsa

  • nader

    Votes: 17 23.9%
  • bush

    Votes: 39 54.9%
  • kerry

    Votes: 15 21.1%

  • Total voters
    71
Bush the (biggest dickhead in the world) will win.

expect more people to die if he wins again.
 
to all the people who r putting so much faith in kerry, i am certainly no bush fan, quite the opposite, but i think kerry might actually be slightly more corrupt than shrub is, at least he has shown he isn't afraid to take out enemies, hopefully he will take out iran next (which really should have come before iraq but nevermind). if kerry becomes president he wants to repair relations with iran and trade with them, which is 1 of the single most idiotic polices i can think of
 
j__ said:
to all the people who r putting so much faith in kerry, i am certainly no bush fan, quite the opposite, but i think kerry might actually be slightly more corrupt than shrub is, at least he has shown he isn't afraid to take out enemies, hopefully he will take out iran next (which really should have come before iraq but nevermind). if kerry becomes president he wants to repair relations with iran and trade with them, which is 1 of the single most idiotic polices i can think of


Iran? first? iraq should never have happened ..what about Rwanda, Sudan, congo? dont they deserve the calvary coming to the rescue?
 
Gorgon said:
Bush the (biggest dickhead in the world) will win.

expect more people to die if he wins again.


and expect more bush d*ck sucking from Blair.
 
CptStern said:
Iran? first? iraq should never have happened ..what about Rwanda, Sudan, congo? dont they deserve the calvary coming to the rescue?


Canada will take care of that.
 
I'm gonna vote for kerry just so we can (hopefully) all the things bush has set into motion.

I am never going to vote for a candidate (*cough Cheney) that says america will be attacked again if kerry is elected. Scare tactics!

but i think this war on terror nonsense has got to stop.
 
aeroripper said:
I'm gonna vote for kerry just so we can (hopefully) all the things bush has set into motion.

I am never going to vote for a candidate (*cough Cheney) that says america will be attacked again if kerry is elected. Scare tactics!

but i think this war on terror nonsense has got to stop.

Kerry lost this election... And this is a Liebral sight!

Edit: Fixed my spelling. ;)
 
i'm going to win. who the heck is nader?! the last time i checked there were only two people running for president.(sorry i live in canada, so i don't really know, and im 14 years old.)
 
Darkknighttt said:
i'm going to win. who the heck is nader?! the last time i checked there were only two people running for president.(sorry i live in canada, so i don't really know, and im 14 years old.)

Nader is the guy who will be most responsible for ensuring GB is re-elected. Seriously... I'm not kidding.

Just like he's done here.
 
CptStern said:
Iran? first? iraq should never have happened ..what about Rwanda, Sudan, congo? dont they deserve the calvary coming to the rescue?

perhaps if u r talking about humanitarian issues, however iran still needs to be real high up the list if that is the case

however i was talking about what bush said, eg terrorist threat, WMD etc, iran is a far worse threat on those accounts


edit: u r correct by the way saying iraq should never have happened, at least not this recent war, everything should have been taken care of in first gulf war
 
According to the people on this forums Nader has more chances to win than Kerry...
 
i'm going to win. who the heck is nader?! the last time i checked there were only two people running for president.(sorry i live in canada, so i don't really know, and im 14 years old.)
Reply With Quote

Ralph Nader has run for election in the past just to take some votes away from the other candidates. He's an Independent and not affiliated with the republicans or democratic parties. He's using his own personal money to run.


According to the people on this forums Nader has more chances to win than Kerry...

haha, that would be interesting if Nader got elected
 
j__ said:
perhaps if u r talking about humanitarian issues, however iran still needs to be real high up the list if that is the case

however i was talking about what bush said, eg terrorist threat, WMD etc, iran is a far worse threat on those accounts


edit: u r correct by the way saying iraq should never have happened, at least not this recent war, everything should have been taken care of in first gulf war


why do you think Iran need humanitarian aid? Maybe you're referring to the fact that there human rights abuses in iran but not any worse than saudi arabia, in fact saudi arabia is far worse ..but they're an ally of the US so they're untouchable ...for the moment (saddam was an ally and he was shielded by the US many times when other countries tried to bring saddam to justice)

I must remind you that the current war was about WMD, we all know how that turned out


and if the jutification was that it was for humanitarian reasons, well we all know how that turned out

and if the jutification was that saddam was helping Al queda well we all know how that turned out

and if the justification was that Saddam was harbouring terrorists, well we all know how that turned out

and if the justification that Saddam was a tyrant, well we all know how that turned out
 
not humanitarian aid, human rights abuses

by the way go do some research on this and compare it to saudi arabia, i think u will find, if anything, they r on a par

at least the actual government/ruling family don't support terrorism in saudi, their security services are suspected of having large elements of support for them though
 
j__ said:
not humanitarian aid, human rights abuses

by the way go do some research on this and compare it to saudi arabia, i think u will find, if anything, they r on a par

at least the actual government/ruling family don't support terrorism in saudi, their security services are suspected of having large elements of support for them though

yes but saudi arabia is an ally ...dont you think it's a bit hypocritical to single out iran but ignore saudi arabia?

most of the terrorists from 9/11 were saudi
 
I said Bush, but I pray for Kerry

BTW I am not American, but I know that my country - Canada - will be affected by this election.
 
I think bush will win. and it's not gonna be because of nader. Bush wil most likely win because he is more pupolar than kerry. but who cares, kerry is just like bush, the other side of the coin.
I hope nader would win :p but that's just very unlikely.
 
hasan said:
I think bush will win. and it's not gonna be because of nader. Bush wil most likely win because he is more pupolar than kerry. bu twho cares, kerry is just like bush.
I hope nader would win :p but that's just very unlikely.

Yes Nader is really really good... You keep saying that Canuck so that he gets more followers. :e
 
Sgt_Shellback said:
Yes Nader is really really good... You keep saying that Canuck so that he gets more followers. :e
Canuck? lol
I think I am a little proud that I am annoying a US Soldier who invaded my country ;)

Why do you hate the french like so? heh, not that I like them or anything. Just wondering. I thought you would say I am some Muslim Terrorist rather than a French Canadian (isn't that what Canuck is supposed to mean?).

Yes, I would vote Nader if I was there. Why? because Kerry doesn't deserve my vote, he is taking it for grandted.
Anyone but Bush? no .. not me.
 
hasan said:
Canuck? lol
I think I am a little proud that I am annoying a US Soldier who invaded my country ;)

Why do you hate the french like so? heh, not that I like them or anything. Just wondering. I thought you would say I am some Muslim Terrorist rather than a French Canadian (isn't that what Canuck is supposed to mean?).

Yes, I would vote Nader if I was there. Why? because Kerry doesn't deserve my vote, he is taking it for grandted.
Anyone but Bush? no .. not me.

Every vote for Nader is a vote for Bush... Canuck.
 
That is true if I wanted kerry to win. But I don't want him to win. He's just another bush.
If I had to choose between Kerry and Bush, I would run this code:
Code:
#include <iostream>
#include <ctime>
using namespace std;

int main()
{
	srand(time(0));

	if(rand()%2)
		cout << "I vote Bush.\n";

	else
		cout << "I vote Kerry.\n";
	
	return 0;
}
but when I have a third choice, I'd go for the third.
 
:dozey: If Kerry wins, Bush loses. Bush wins, Kerry loses... but, in reality whether Kerry or Bush wins, the other will win as well, both are identical beings.
 
ailevation said:
:dozey: If Kerry wins, Bush loses. Bush wins, Kerry loses... but, in reality whether Kerry or Bush wins, the other will win as well, both are identical beings.
I second that!!
 
CptStern said:
yes but saudi arabia is an ally ...dont you think it's a bit hypocritical to single out iran but ignore saudi arabia?

most of the terrorists from 9/11 were saudi


yeah but whats the point even discussing going after saudi arabia, they r best buds with US, pointless even thinking about it
 
Back
Top