R
rLaag
Guest
http://files.filefront.com/gaympg/;4249916;;/fileinfo.html
a 2 mb clip that shows why source is bad plz reply on what u think
a 2 mb clip that shows why source is bad plz reply on what u think
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Kyo said:the pub server is frequented by people I know personaly.
This is why I think CS:S is bad. It seems to attrack the elitist bastards that believe your life is a failure, because your opinion differs from theirs. Not saying you're one of them, but your comment resembles how they present themselves.xLostx said:All I play is CS but not source because it's for noobs. 1.6 ftw
You were shooting a timeout? That doesn't mean anything.rLaag said:http://files.filefront.com/gaympg/;4249916;;/fileinfo.html
a 2 mb clip that shows why source is bad plz reply on what u think
dekstar said:You were shooting a timeout? That doesn't mean anything.
Nah it's not that. I started on 1.6 so that's what I got good. on. Surf_maps like Aztec and Egypt are what I trained on. I moved to source and everything was heavier. I just didn't like it.TheMastahC said:I don't see how you can say surfing is better in 1.6. I first started surfing in Source, and later went back and tried some on 1.6. The problem with 1.6 surf maps is that the makers normally don't set the view distance long enough, so you only see several hundred feet in front of you. Unlike in Source where you see damn near everything.
TheMastahC said:...As for which group is better, CSS people or 1.6 people... I hate everyone, but I'll say CSS, because there seems to be less kids.
QFTABIRCrisis King said:Interesting point. I bet it's because with CSS people are generally over the age of 18, have jobs and are able to afford computers that are able to run CSS at an acceptable level. Whereas 1.6, generally speaking of course, the 11-14 year olds own older computers and still play 1.6 because they're unable to run CSS.
Crisis King said:Interesting point. I bet it's because with CSS people are generally over the age of 18, have jobs and are able to afford computers that are able to run CSS at an acceptable level. Whereas 1.6, generally speaking of course, the 11-14 year olds own older computers and still play 1.6 because they're unable to run CSS.
Mikademius said:Thank god I have a good job and a $10000 machine kids go play cs1.6 so we can play a good game with normal people