why does kucinich keep on getting rejected from the debates?

He has the rhetoric of the European worker's movement, and I don't think that will go down well in the US.
 
Is that guy a democrat candidate for the presidency??
He's absolutely awesome.
 
It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. NBC actually invited him beause he met the qualifications they had set which was that you had to be in 4th place or above, which he was. But 2 days later they changed the qualifications and actually uninvited him. He has won every debate he has been in yet he is being totally excluded at this point.
 
Because he has 1% of support? They can't invite everyone, there has to be a cut off point somewhere.
 
He's good in a debate though. Kucinich should be invited if only to keep the others on their toes :p
 
He's pretty good. I remember thinking it was weird Solaris chose obama instead of him in the poll.
 
The news has been trying to exclude him and Ron Paul from a lot of stuff. Unfortunate really, but it certainly seems that the news doesn't have the strangle-hold it used to & it's losing it's grip more and more. Internet FTW! (Well, maybe next election cycle, but progress is certainly good!)
 
He saw a ufo. now it's hush hush. Meh, a friend of Ron Paul is a friend of mine though.

update
Never mind, he's for gun control. now I hate him.
 
Meh, Kucinich, well, he's like, just the guy who'll make it all better...Gun control, abolishing drug restricting laws, pulling the meat club out of the shit hole, or rather withdrawing the US military from Iraq (I'd love to see someone finally slapping Blackwater in the FACE)
He's like, the musterknabe, about everything progressive, while Paul is just the conservative guy, who'll at least keep the constitution real and not mess with US citizens' rights, like bearing arms, which I by now totally agree with, for certain reasons.

Well, I really am wondering wether Paul might actually pick him for a running mate, he'd create much of a hype then, but it'd be fricken awesome anyway...
So the point is, haven't you guys at no point ever wondered why they got, like how many? Seven candidates on the republicans' side, while they keep -at any given time- the rate of candidates on the democratic side, the total of which originally is like two candidates less than the republican party's candidates, AT MERELY THREE PERSONS -OBAMA, HITLERY AND EDWARDS!? WHILE THE REPUBLICANS GET *MOST* OF THEIR CANDIDATES (except Ron Paul of course, because he's antiamerican and blablabla *insert neocon crap*)

Because it happens to turn out that ALL of the candidates featured by the mainstream media so far are either members of the council on foreign relations (Bhutto was on it, too, I think that also accounts for Angelina Jolie, though this won't make the organization any less sinister. Oh, did you know Bhutto declared OBL as dead two months prior to her death during an interview, and that that specific section was censored by all standards on the side of the BBC?) OR have attended bilderberger conferences.

The CFR really has interest in ALL candidates, except Gravel, Kucinich and Paul, Thompson is on, Hitlery is, Barack Hussein, Huckabee has his foreign policy assistants from the organization, and not surprisingly, Neocon-figure McCain is on it, too. Dunno wether Fail-Figure Giuliani is on, too.
Welcome to the club!
 
Back
Top