Search results

so what about the conspiracy theory that many teachers use their job to push political dogma instead of really educating? ;) sorry for the jest..i am not anal about grammar but the opportunity was just too good to pass up :D now back to work.

jokes are only funny if they are about right wing imperialist aggressor racist sexist pigs. that means, unless something is relevent to a (an extreme)lefties political cause it is beneath notice or concern..like: having a miss black america pageant is okay and good, but if we had a miss...

bush does not make laws, congress does. as for women with no rights, you do not have to use ancient greece as an example, simply use a country under islamic law today.

like the people who were theree when saddam ran that prison? where were your objections to abu gharib when saddam and his cronies were using it to cut people tongues out, cut off hands and feet, or simply kill people who refused to co-operate? was it not politically expediant therefore not...

that would depend on if you considered anything sterner than "pretty please" torture would it not? BTW you sure can read alot into a simple sentence ,you should change your tag to "ad hom" :)

i did not see any demonstrations when saddam was killing tens of thousands of people and putting them in mass graves. there were was no great outcry for it to stop. the UN (or rather those in control of the UN) and especially france germany nd even russia did not care because they were making...

details like that do not matter, they are all part of the evil american empire and must be BLAMED. after all, we all know that all one has to do to get information out of a resistant militant is simply to say "pretty puuuhhhlease tell us" and they will say everything we want to know.

i was in the USAR from 87-91 1 CAV 489th ENG BN. i already voiced my opinion, i want him to be in canada as much as he wants to be there.

i will just recreate the post you obviously missed. maybe we should start a new thread since this is a bit OT no problem. in 1948 the only outside aid went from britain to various arab nations and groups in the form of arms. 4 british planes were shot down in combat by israel flying...

just think of the contribution all these US deserters could make to the canadian army...

no problem. :D in 1948 the only outside aid went from britain to various arab nations and groups in the form of arms. 4 british planes were shot down in combat by israel flying ironically enough german surplus planes. israel did not recive any aid from the united states. since you seem to...

man you just dont have a clue do you?

sure. at the time iran was more of a concern than iraq was, basically it seemed to be "a lesser than 2 evils" choice(or appeared to be that time) they(meaning the US) were wrong. so you basic point then is that saddam is not to blame for all the people he killed, america is. that is like...

this is an honest question hasan. did you/do you support the baath party?

wounded from afgahnistan are treated at landstuhl as well, you seemed to have forgotten to factor that in. BTW how many people were found in mass graves in iraq again? http://www.thisislondon.com/news/articles/14004914?source=Evening%20Standard

israel did not have american aid in 1948 or in 1967, that is complete BS. get your facts straight. in fact israel unaided could kick the arse of most european nations but rather quickly and even give the US a serious challenge for a while.

gues what, the military is not a democracy, not even in canada. i hope his hearing goes well for him, i want him to stay in canada as much as he does...

the UN is falling apart and has been because it is a corrupt and useless organization in it's own right and has been for years.

looks like stern is trying to change the subject to "BLAME AMERICA™" yet again. besides how is the UN going to "police" anything without the US to do most of the work for them? oh! i know! by taking bribes and kickbacks from the ones that are supossedly are being "policed" the UN is a farce.

just to make things a bit more interesting: 1+1=2 therefore 2-1=1. what keeps this idea from being circular reasoning?