Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
c'mon now.Ennui said:If those are actually in-game shots, then I'm amazed. Those are beautiful, better quality than Final Fantasy cinematics.
why the hell are all these next-gen games set in the city? where's FFXIII amd some beautiful outdoor environmentsjimbo118 said:
One of the Mods should change the name of this thread to "The Unofficial Next-Generation Image Thread"jimbo118 said:
The UE3 has better character models, but doesn't overall look as good IMO.Grey Fox said:The look good, but not that impressive at all. What the unreal 3 engine could do was much, much more impressive. That looks like something that could be done with the best PC's today with 3dmark, infact the existing 05 mark is more impressive.
its a pc game actually now that i've looked it up( i think they're the pc screens but they're in both the ps3 and xbox 360 section too) , but its coming out on ps3 and xbox 360(such a bad name) aswell, looks pretty good imo.Datrix said:One of the Mods should change the name of this thread to "The Unofficial Next-Generation Image Thread"
And those PS3 visuals don't impress me much... maybe they're old screens though.
[/IMG]
They say it's going to be the same as going from PD to Halo, that's so large you can't even go back and play that game anymore.WhiteZero said:Not as much of a graphical jump to PS3 as it was from PS1 to PS2.
I didn't say PD was a bad game (although I do like Halo more) I'm just saying that it was a huge jump in terms of visuals. (N64 to Xbox)Grey Fox said:Well a lot of people still think pd is way better then halo, I'm one of them.
Perfect DarkPressure said:What is PD?
Datrix said:Because the cars in these "screenshots" look better than your car in reality?
jimbo118 said:
the game looks quite good, trying to find more info on it.IchI said:These look more delievable to me. But I do not see any fancy shaders or anything. It just seems pritty standard...
exactlyGrey Fox said:c'mon now.
Thye look good, but not that impressive at all. What the unreal 3 engine could do was much, much more impressive. That looks like something that could be done with the best PC's today with 3dmark, infact the existing 05 mark is more impressive.
exactly againGrey Fox said:Well a lot of people still think pd is way better then halo, I'm one of them.
What game?Minerel said:This game is about racing not about staring at gfx.
Gotcha.Minerel said:Look at the post before mine.
poseyjmac said:the screenshots look great, but im not floored. because well, all the pictures are at 640x480 if you notice.
looking at these pictures on an average PC users desktop, and they really can't help but look great. and you can see at least 4x AA on each shot. a lot of the reason they look so cool is simply because of resolution + AA. the engine looks great too though, but still.
to get it to look THAT good on your PC in fullscreen, you would need to be running at 1600x1200+ with your AA and AF jacked up to high heaven. heres hoping by the time it comes out, the latest video cards can handle it at good framerates.
oh lol i actually thought i saw it was for PS3 lol!!!!!poseyjmac said:it says PC on the page..unless you're being sarcastic. in that case: HaHa!
Because it's one more step to godlike powers.why everibody is so obsesed whit the realism?
To escape the rules, morals and ethics of reality....yes. There's nothing wrong with it looking real.nicrd said:Dont we play games to escape reality?
err... what?Mr-Fusion said:Because it's one more step to godlike powers.
looks like the Doom 3 engine, with no enhancements, except there's more light this time.... boringDatrix said:You really think that your PC will be able to do that in a year?
Anyways I think it's impressive... well atleast a lot more impressive than this Next-Gen game: