3DMark05 Released.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tork
  • Start date Start date
Whohooo!!!



EDIT: Sorry, I was actually testing if I could post again (with the nothon blocking crap off...)

EDIT: wait, the link doesn't work?!
 
Ok thanks, that seems to work...

*takes place in line*

EDIT: Have you got any 3Dmark results yet? :)
 
waiting in line. I'll post results when I have ran the test .. Could be a while .. Any results from you guys yet ?
 
Please post all your marks here: so we can make a discussion.
 
54% downloaded...14 minutes left.

What specs half alive?
 
The filefront one works and is quite fast...im getting 150kb/sec on the public servers from US to UK:D.

I only had to wait 5 minutes to start downloading. Filefront > Fileplanet.
 
Lol it was a bitch watching it run at a constant 1fps, sometimes 2fps on the cpu tests.
 
Alig said:
Lol it was a bitch watching it run at a constant 1fps, sometimes 2fps on the cpu tests.
You only got 1 fps with that rig!?

This bittorrent is choking my connection (upload) and it'll still take 4 hours to get apparently.
 
JimmehH said:
You only got 1 fps with that rig!?


Nah the cpu tests i only got 1 fps throughout :(

The GFX tests i averaged about 15 - 25 fps...dropped to about 5 on occasions so my score was just my GFX card really..the cpu score could'nt of been any lower.

Edit/ It does have a 2ghz spec though i think and mines is only a 2.6ghz...would need an AMD64 FX to get a half good cpu score i reckon.
 
CB | Para said:
Oh really? :laugh:

It's not working hehe.

its working, LOL

I am 100% sure its working.

Click it and wait, if you waited more than 30 seconds then its not working ;)
 
Wow, that was pretty fast. You'd think they'd wait longer to release the mark after the timer's been posted.
 
Getting it from Fileplanet.

Woah...wtf. I get to my place in line and start my d/l. 8400kb/sec slowly creeping down...at first I think this is because it's continuing from another place I d/led and it's just verifying the file...but no..It's still at 3mb/sec about 50% of the way through (I only had about 2% of the d/l done on the previous place). Now it crept down to 500kb/s and im 87% of the way through...weird.
 
So how does everything look?! yea yea nice scores and stuff but do hows it look?
 
Like this

Kinda looks like this. . .

3598 3dmarks

2800+
1 gig 2700 DC DDR ram
A400 GT
 
1994 3dmarks..i think that may be a little bit low though...

radeon 9800pro
p4 2,4ghz
768mb ram
win xp sp1
 
1780 running a 9700 OCed to Pro on the Omega's based on 4.9
 
First set of tests it ran at about 5-7fps, then the next that seemed to be lower res ran at 1-2

Ouch.. score of 914.

This new 3DMarks makes doom 3 and hl2 look outdated x.x

edit: Oh the 2nd test was testing cpu speed..
 
6609 for me..... are these tests for advanced graphics like unreal engine 3 and the likes?
 
Lol, just saw that you must have a DirectX 9.0 card to be able to benchmark. :( My poor little Geforce IV Ti4200... ;(
 
2288 here.

p4 2.6c @ 3ghz (231 * 13)
9800non-pro @ pro speeds (380/340)
1024MB of corsair pc3200 xms 2-7-3-2
 
Agent.M said:
6609 for me..... are these tests for advanced graphics like unreal engine 3 and the likes?

dam, that is an awsome score.

how much the monitor did cost ?

its around £1800 over here UK :(

edit: what res did you test it with and AA FAA was ON ?

thanks
 
Gorgon said:
dam, that is an awsome score.

how much the monitor did cost ?

its around £1800 over here UK :(

edit: what res did you test it with and AA FAA was ON ?

thanks

The monitor was $2300, since its not a purchased version of 3dmark 05 I couldnt change any of the options it was in 1024*768
no aa or af. Something i dont understand however is that other people with the same setup were scoring in the 8000's i know they may be overclocking but do fx 53's come in different MHz or something?? SOrry Im kinda noob to all this stuff.
 
Agent.M said:
The monitor was $2300, since its not a purchased version of 3dmark 05 I couldnt change any of the options it was in 1024*768
no aa or af. Something i dont understand however is that other people with the same setup were scoring in the 8000's i know they may be overclocking but do fx 53's come in different MHz or something?? SOrry Im kinda noob to all this stuff.

cheers, then its the same price. its an awsome monitor.

FX53 does not come with diffrent MHz, But people do overclock it. the latest ground breaking record for OC FX was 3 days ago made at extermsystem.com and its:

FX53 default speed is 2.4 -----------> overclocked to 3.6 under LS VAPOOCHIL cooling system ;) sweet
 
I got a 4,012.

With my:

6800 GT (not overclocked)
Pentium 4 3.06
1 gig RAM.

The test with the huge leviathan monster and the airship is really awesome, way imaginative. The other ones are sorta lame though, though visually spectacular of course. Those CPU tests really pwned my processor. I actually think I heard it scream at one point.

I might try OC'ing my GT up to 400 and see how I do.
 
Gorgon said:
cheers, then its the same price. its an awsome monitor.

FX53 does not come with diffrent MHz, But people do overclock it. the latest ground breaking record for OC FX was 3 days ago made at extermsystem.com and its:

FX53 default speed is 2.4 -----------> overclocked to 3.6 under LS VAPOOCHIL cooling system ;) sweet

Ic well under 3dmark system then when I choose details it says fx53 the internal clock says 1.2 and then Internal clock maximun 2.4 is that correct speed for my processor if default is 2.4 why does mine say maximun is 2.4?

BLah this stuff confusses me :eek: :p
 
Agent.M said:
6609 for me..... are these tests for advanced graphics like unreal engine 3 and the likes?

How the hell did you get nearly 7k? Ive the same cpu/card and I only got 4100 or so..
 
ShadowBlade said:
How the hell did you get nearly 7k? Ive the same cpu/card and I only got 4100 or so..

Ahh I c thanks, I dont know how I got that score I got my system form alienware and they did the video optimiser thing to it so maybe they overclocked my card of something I have no idea....what I dont understand is how some people on there results page with the same sytem I have were getting in the 8k region.
 
1112... hey, not all that much less than my '03 score... and man, when it got up to 8fps that was smooooth!


3dmark.jpg
 
Back
Top