VirusType2
Newbie
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2005
- Messages
- 18,189
- Reaction score
- 2
I never implied that vehicle technology won't improve. It's just that, it could be 100 years before it's actually cheaper to make vehicles with this new technology. And, without government intervention, that's the determining factor whether we will change and use cleaner transportation technology. And as long as we still have fossil fuel, it doesn't look good.What part of 300 years in the future don't you understand? You assume cars will continue to use fossil fuels and pollute the environment, when there's a clear indication that clean energy sources will gradually replace the need for fossil fuel. Not to mention that it's possible cars won't be used at all 100 years from now.
I only pointed out one example. It's just one of the many problems we face, and therefore one of the many studies.The problem with studies like this is that they have a narrow view of one environmental problem, project it linearly into the future, in this case 300 years, then go on to declare OMG WE'RE DOOMED!!11.
I believe that we will figure a lot of things out in the long run, no question, but don't lose sight of what my point was in the first place: the idea that we are going to - without question - continue to exist for billions of years isn't guaranteed, and suggesting otherwise is not automatically annoying/not worthy of discussion.
There are many gloomy future predictions that, while do not suggest the 'end of the human race' necessarily (besides the giant asteroids, etc.), they do indicate major changes that could drastically reduce our population - for example, we may have to remain indoors/live underground to protect us from the Sun.
So then, nobody in this world has good intentions to create a mode of transportation that requires less fuel, or perhaps a way more efficient form of public transportation that is even better than that of Europe? Technological advancements aren't going to stop next year, and neither are new ideas.
I never said anything about intentions. But fair enough, guys, if you disagree. You do make good points. I just don't see people willing to adapt. People make lighter, greener vehicles, and most everyone balks at the very idea of them.
We were arguing about a specific point in time, which was 300 years.Maybe not 300 years, but we have 4 BILLION to go!