5 worst Gaming Articles of 2005

haha thats great stuff. Tim's Epic Journey Through Animal Crossing :p
 
Something aweful is the best thing evar.
 
I'd hate to get on that guys bad side. He could put me on the brink of suicide in one sentence.
 
Hahaha great find!!

His Darwinia reveiw was great...poor guy got his column torn up and smahed apart by the something awful guy.
 
I love SA.

And yeah i've never agreed with Jason Ocampo on anything.
 
Haha, awesome.

Jason Ocampo is an awful reviewer, he's such an idiot. In his review of HL2 for the PC he slams its story, yet in his Xbox review he praises the story as one of its finer points.

Jason Ocampo is horrible.
 
irony of all of Kieron's post-genre stoner philosophy is that he's probably the same sort of dude who gets totally stoked for a game like Mario Fishing or Mario Hoppin' On Shit in 3D. That's because he's really intelligent and he loves things that totally explode genre barriers by including Mario

lol thats awesome!
That's all for today. The top two spots will be finished out on Monday. Here is a hint about the two winning articles: they were both written by the same person and neither one is actually from 2005. They are so ****ing horrible that they have transcended the limitations of linear time
lmao
 
What in the world are these people thinking?

*kicks jason*
 
Something Awful is annoying and hypocritical, articles like this annoy me, since some of their writers aren't exactly of top notch quality.
 
What an idiot that Zack Parsons guy is. You know, I criticize HIS review of Jason Ocampo's review, for being a dumbass to society. I hate people that pull out their dictionaries to bring others down.
 
Parsons is the shit, and if you think otherwise then you can go die in your corner.

His thrashing of the Eurogamer review was spot-on. All of their writing seems like it comes from a group of arrogant, pseudo-intellectual dipshits, flaunting some kind of faux elitism.

Kangy said:
Something Awful is annoying and hypocritical, articles like this annoy me, since some of their writers aren't exactly of top notch quality.

No, SA does not churn out gold all the time, but it's entirely different. They are self-depricating, exaggerated, and mocking not out of some kind of genuine angst, but because it's comedic. Not really comparable to a half-assed philosophical monologue that's in some way related to Darwinia. At te least, seriousness and credibility isn't SA's priority.

Freemanator89 said:
What an idiot that Zack Parsons guy is. You know, I criticize HIS review of Jason Ocampo's review, for being a dumbass to society. I hate people that pull out their dictionaries to bring others down.

There's nothing in that article that can't be understood by a retard in junior high school.
 
Yeah, SA can be hit or miss sometimes, but when they do a write a good article, then I lmao.

Parsons is the shit, and I like that Jebidiah guy because he's just so freaking wierd.

And those articles were funny. The "IT'S SHIT" thing cracked me up when I read that.
 
Back
Top