61.45 drivers reviewed at AnandTech

Alig said:
Your not a fanboy but you want to flame someone to death because they dont agree with you about ATI. K whatever trevor.

Ati only started rivaling nvidia with the 9700...before that card they was no where on the map to be seen so you like facts but you need to get your facts right because NO, ati dont always pull through ok.

The FX isnt a bad line of cards...you just go off ****ing rumours and one-off's E.G you think the 6800 is ****ing toss because it needs a 450W psu (which is a load of unoffical babble) _BUT_ you have a 550W psu for what god damn reason? / The 5600FX sucked (the hoover one) not because it was actually a BAD card on fps/games/benchmarks but because it was loud....if you want to play that game pal then ATI really ****ing suck because they have made countless sucky sucky cards over the years.

This whole 6800 vs x800 is green apples Vs red apples...one tastes sweet and one tastes sour, both are apple flavoured and both are nice.

1. All of the radeon family competed with nvidia. not the 9700 alone.
2. I own 4 different FX cards, which are all in my closet, rightfully so, because they were terrible.
3. I said the 6800 is a good buy but the xt is a better buy.
4. Name one sucky card ati made within the past 5 years.
5. I agree with you about your apple simile. But one apple is a better buy.
6. To the idiot who said alig owned me...well...maybe you should have something to argue with me or alig about before you can make statements yourself.
 
guinny said:
2. I own 4 different FX cards, which are all in my closet, rightfully so, because they were terrible.

Wow if they were terrible why did you buy 4 different versions? I mean really waste of money.
 
FX5200 i bought literally just to see what was so bad...god wat a mistake. fx5600 i had hopes for...let me down. fx 5800 was decent but still id rather have a gf4 then that piece of crap, and the fx5950 was the only one that impressed me slightly.
 
Back
Top