AGE OF EMPIRES 3 HANDS ON !!!! [ Gamespy ]

DigiQ8

Tank
Joined
Jul 6, 2003
Messages
5,955
Reaction score
0
Gamespy AoE 3 Hands-On

Oh my god this is beautiful :eek:
age-of-empires-iii-20050428034552316.jpg
 
wow !
getting better and better. cant whait

and berlin one :eek: :eek:
 
I want it. Now, i had all Age of Empires, and i plan on having this one too. : p

-NSF
 
The previous AoE was great and i cnt wait for this 1.

Hmm.. think how AoE 4 will look.
 
Its looking absolutely gorgeous. I'll be picking this one up when its released. :)

Thanks for the pics.
 
Good, for a while I thought I was the only person who used Gamespy.
Game looks awesome, BTW. :)
 
I loved AoE I and II, but this one looks like it will be the best of 'em all!
 
Minerel said:
Yall act like gfx make the game.
No
i love the AoE serias , its really fun game espcieally the multiplayer part.
so im not only excited about the graphics , im excited about the game itself ( AGE OF EMPIRES 3 ) weeeeeeeeeeeeee i love this game ......
 
If you are exicted about the game itself how much can you tell me to what it really comes down to?
The Gameplay.

I mean I look at EE2, currently it holds the best graphics for an rts, and some people have the nerve to say "EE2 gfx suck compared to AoE3" yet would still get up and say "Why would you compare HL2 gfx vs Next Gen gfx".

All i'm saying is people have a tendency to let what they want to feel\expect to feel get infront of how good the game actually is.

I mean I loved AOE2, but I don't even know how much of the actual team who made that game is still there. So I am going to judge this game like any other game. I know little about the actual gameplay that will be featured in it. So currently I don't really care for this game until I get an actual hands on demo\actual game.
Right now I am still wondering how this would "revolutonize" or set the standards for the next RTS's to come.
 
EE2 ^_^ theres a diffrence. In the name and developers.(EE2 was made by a diff company than EE).
 
that's a cool interview- they don't hold back and say 'no comment' or anything. This game is truely going to rock.
 
no but its more than the other AOEs, and having one that's nearly unobtainable is a good incentive for the hardcore rts gamers.
 
i am most looking foward to big colonial ship battles- master and commander style. hopefully they feature strongly. If so, my computer chair will need a serious clean.
 
this game does look great indead but, im just a little bumbed out about the time period this game takes play, i wish it took place in the medevil times, instead of civil war type time era
 
So it's still not that much compared to other games...
 
Minerel said:
So it's still not that much compared to other games...
do You want it to be 216456 ages ?
so the player keeps upgrading and upgrading etc...

This game gonna be fun beleive me
 
This game gonna be fun beleive me
Im not doubting it wont be fun, though I am not exactly sure..as well I havn't really been givin a hands on demo, though you act like 5 ages is alot which it isn't at all..maybe for a AOE game but no..not in the Gaming World or hell even the Starcraft Mapping World.

I am just saying, 5 ages is not that much, I am not saying im upset with it or that I dislike that many or anything. I am just saying it is not that much.
 
Minerel said:
If you are exicted about the game itself how much can you tell me to what it really comes down to?
The Gameplay.

I mean I look at EE2, currently it holds the best graphics for an rts, and some people have the nerve to say "EE2 gfx suck compared to AoE3" yet would still get up and say "Why would you compare HL2 gfx vs Next Gen gfx".

All i'm saying is people have a tendency to let what they want to feel\expect to feel get infront of how good the game actually is.

I mean I loved AOE2, but I don't even know how much of the actual team who made that game is still there. So I am going to judge this game like any other game. I know little about the actual gameplay that will be featured in it. So currently I don't really care for this game until I get an actual hands on demo\actual game.
Right now I am still wondering how this would "revolutonize" or set the standards for the next RTS's to come.
I totally agree.
 
Samon said:
I don't think anyone is too sure. We'll have to see.

I hope they make something more that medieval ages

and 5 ages are not so many,empire earth hav like 10
 
Do remember RJ, AOE is not about going from Past to Present to/or Future.
 
http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/age-of-empires-iii/609209p1.html
Nations Article is up :

-Russians will be able to train infantry and villagers in groups
-the Ottomans will be able to spawn settlers for free, as well as having plenty of unique units
-Germans spawn unique Uhlan cavalry and Settler Wagons
-the Dutch can build banks for free gold
-the Portuguese get another TC/TC Wagon at the start of the game
-the Spanish get more support from the HC and might also receive more military units in the beginning
-the French have unique settler, the Coureur, who is tougher and also have an easier time allying with natives
-the British get the Redcoats in later ages, and also get a free settler every time they build a house

Taken from Age of Empires III Heaven Forum
 
You know what that means? AOE4 will be set during WWI-WWII. YAY! :D
 
Well Poet you have to learn to read, Tweedy beat you to it already, just read my replies to him.

And anyway so what if it had 4? I am simply saying it is not that much. It isn't that many ages. What kind of a response is "The oringal one had only four", because it still isn't really changing anything that I said. I am not comparing it to AOE or AOE2.
I am simply saying, "Five ages is not that many, and you shouldn't get excited over 5 ages"
I'm not saying I want more ages, I want less ages, or just one age. I am saying 5 is no reason to get excited about.
 
I dont think people are getting excited Mineral. It's just a new element to the game that looks like it should provide a new dimension on multiplayer AOE. When you say "5 ages is not that many" you are obviously comparing it to something that isn't any other Age of Empires game. That is simply a unfair comparison to make and criticise on.

Why do you only want one? The ages is an integral part of the game.
 
I am simply saying that 5 ages is not alot.
God you people are getting on my backs. I am simply saying that.

I never said I wanted one, you should read it better.
I am saying
I'm not saying; I want more ages, I want less ages, or just one age.
Or in other words
I'm not saying I want more ages
I'm not saying I want just one age.
I'm not saying I want less ages.
 
Minerel said:
I am simply saying that 5 ages is not alot.
God you people are getting on my backs. I am simply saying that.

I never said I wanted one, you should read it better.
I am saying
I'm not saying; I want more ages, I want less ages, or just one age.
Or in other words
I'm not saying I want more ages
I'm not saying I want just one age.
I'm not saying I want less ages.
then what do u want ? :p
 
Back
Top