angels and demons trailer new

[soulslicer]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekfTP1UQG1o&feature=dir

not sure what to think of this..

 

[Warped]

Tom Hanks is one of my favorite actors, I'll probably at least rent this movie

 

[Deleted member 56031]

I dunno, the last one was pretty crap but angels and demons was a much better book than the da vinci code. I would say we'll probably get something on par with the last movie :|

BTW that narrator guy ruined that trailer.

 

[Hobostomp]

I find Tom Hanks a bit generic... I won't bother with this.

 

[Hectic Glenn]

I dunno, the last one was pretty crap but angels and demons was a much better book than the da vinci code. I would say we'll probably get something on par with the last movie :|

BTW that narrator guy ruined that trailer.

I agree, I never understood the massive acclaim Da Vinci code got, when Angels and Demons was a much much much better book. Hopefully this will be reflected in the film if its done properly, then perhaps I will go and see this.

 

[Asknoone]

Dan Brown should be shot.

 

[Direwolf]

Hah, that's a bit harsh. The man's not a literary genius, but I saw his books get more than a few people back into reading. He hit the nail right on the head at the time for books that had good actions scenes, competent characters, and enough information in them that you felt like you were learning something. Michael Crichton became famous in a similar method, although Dan Brown showed that the average reader is more willing to learn about history than try and get their head around chaos theory or quantum physics.

If I'm going to carry some hate for a popular author, I think my rage would be better aimed at someone like James Patterson or someone similar who pretends to be high-brow but just really focuses on volume of work.

 

[Lucid]

Not sure about the movie, Ron Howard's treating it as a sequel rather than a prequel.
Also, apparently the crippled grumpy CERN scientist guy from the book isn't going to be in this, so that's iffy too.

Fantastic book though, I think it'd make a great movie.

 

[VictimOfScience]

I will see this--why didn't it come out at Christmas again?

If I'm going to carry some hate for a popular author, I think my rage would be better aimed at someone like James Patterson or someone similar who pretends to be high-brow but just really focuses on volume of work.

LOL! My thoughts exactly 100%!!! Patterson SUCKS.

 

[MJ12]

These books never interested me.

 

[Viperidae]

Dan Brown should be shot.

These books never interested me.

Bscly.

Also the first movie was an utter travesty, and has convinced me that Ron Howard has no ****ing idea what he's doing with this franchise. He should stick to schizophrenic mathematicians.