Anne Coulter and Bill O'Reilly: Well and Truly Wrong

[Kangy]

Coulter knows nowt and Bill blunders his bias.

Hehe, I know not everyone actually likes Michael Moore, but these are rather funny, especially after seeing that Coulter woman being such an ignorant prick a couple of months ago.

Wonderful

 

[Tr0n]

Anne Coulter is pretty stupid...shes hot, but stupid.

 

[Absinthe]

Saw this earlier today.

Watching Coulter make an ass of herself was priceless.

 

[No Limit]

There ya go:

http://www.parisbusinessreview.com/

and this is a good site for all you O'Reilly fans:

http://www.oreilly-sucks.com

 

[burner69]

I've only ever seen that women on the longer version of that clip, but jesus she seems like a prick. She severely abuses her right to freedom of speech. What's she trying to gain?

 

[staticprimer]

Tr0n, did you just call Anne Coulter... hot?

 

[No Limit]

Tr0n, did you just call Anne Coulter... hot?

I'd hit it...but I mean that literally.

 

[CptStern]

Anne Coulter is pretty stupid...shes hot, but stupid.

yes in a "Ilsa the SS Nazi dominatrix" sorta way :sniper: :x



btw why must you people post videos when I'm at work??? now I cant watch it till at least 10 pm

 

[CptStern]

What's she trying to gain?

white supremacy? leather whips for all? nazi emblem to replace ol faithful? canada to split from the US and float away? (my personal choice .."hey europe we need a tow! grab the rope")

 

[Absinthe]

Meh... I'd probably bang Coulter.

 

[Bodacious]

Imports from France fell from an all-time high in 2001 of 30.4 billion to 28.7 billion in 2004.

National Review Online

.... the truth is that France is still suffering from the boycott.

The short-term impact of the boycott against the French was devastating to key French industries. According to a report by the trade publication Wine Spectator, French wine sales fell by 26 percent in the first three months of the boycott and the global share of wine sales by France for the first half of 2003 plummeted by half. A poll by the French Luxury Marketing Council discovered that nearly 4 out of every 10 wealthy Americans were swearing off French goods.

Now the evidence for 2004 indicates continued residual damage to the French business environment resulting from the boycott. Real imports from France to the U.S., which stood at $2.6 billion a year in 2001, are on course to reach barely $2.5 billion in 2004. French wine sales have not recovered, potentially because consumers switched to new brands and never went back. Here is what the evidence shows: The value of French wine exports fell 10 percent in the first five months of 2004, compared with the same period in 2002. Even more embarrassing for the French is that wines from California, Chile, and Australia overtook French wines on global export markets for the first time last year. France exported 1.78 billion bottles; new-world vintners exported 1.93 billion.

Is O'Reilly really a liar, or did he just make a mistake?

I swear, you people need to do some searching before you believe anything moore says.

 

[No Limit]

Imports from France fell from an all-time high in 2001 of 30.4 billion to 28.7 billion in 2004.

National Review Online



Is O'Reilly really a liar, or did he just make a mistake?

I swear, you people need to do some searching before you believe anything moore says.

Actually France has made more money since O'Reilly called his little boycott. I will try to find a source here in a second.

 

[No Limit]

From your own source in February 2004, the United States imported $2.26 billion in French goods and services, up from $2.18 billion in February 2002. O'Reilly called for a boycott sometime in mid 03 I believe.

 

[Bodacious]

Canadial Vietnam War Memorial

Canada sends 30k troops to Vietnam under US flag.

Canadian Medal Of Honor recipiant for service in Vietnam.

Canada was more intimately involved with the US and our plans to invade Vietnam

 

[No Limit]

Canadial Vietnam War Memorial

Canada sends 30k troops to Vietnam under US flag.

Canadian Medal Of Honor recipiant for service in Vietnam.

Canada was more intimately involved with the US and our plans to invade Vietnam

Don't tell me you are going to try to argue that Canada sent troops to Vietnam? That would be something new.

Your sources are talking about Candians (the Canadian people, not government) going into the US army. Canada never sent in any troops!

 

[Bodacious]

From your own source in February 2004, the United States imported $2.26 billion in French goods and services, up from $2.18 billion in February 2002. O'Reilly called for a boycott sometime in mid 03 I believe.

O'reilly just said they lost billions of dollars, not where.

My link proved that. They fell from an all-time high in 2001 of 30.4 billion to 28.7 billion in 2004.

Why does one month matter and the rest do not?

They even fell from 2003 to 2004 from 29,219.3 to 28,711.7 respectively.

Did you even read my link?

http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c4279.html#2004

There it is again.

 

[Absinthe]

Canadial Vietnam War Memorial

Good job. A Geocities site.

Canada sends 30k troops to Vietnam under US flag.

Bodacious, I think you missed the part where it said "under the US flag". That means they volunteered for US military. The Canadian government never sent troops there.

Canadian Medal Of Honor recipiant for service in Vietnam.

*Ahem* See above.

Canada was more intimately involved with the US and our plans to invade Vietnam[/QUOTE]

Bodacious, I'm curious as to what this actually has to do with Canadian troops actually being deployed in Vietnam.

You wouldn't be trying to shift the topic onto something else, now would you?

 

[No Limit]

O'reilly just said they lost billions of dollars, not where.

My link proved that. They fell from an all-time high in 2001 of 30.4 billion to 28.7 billion in 2004.

Why does one month matter and the rest do not?

They even fell from 2003 to 2004 from 29,219.3 to 28,711.7 respectively.

Did you even read my link?

http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c4279.html#2004

There it is again.

Do you understand the nature of a boycott? A boycott means we will stop importing products from their country; imports actually rose after O'Reilly called this boycott meaning O'Reilly's boycott had absolutely no effect and he was lying.

 

[Bodacious]

Don't tell me you are going to try to argue that Canada sent troops to Vietnam? That would be something new.

Your sources are talking about Candians (the Canadian people, not government) going into the US army. Canada never sent in any troops!

So because they fought for the US that somehow invalidates their citizenship?
That they were soldiers that were part of Canada's military and took the option to go fight in vietnam somehow doesn't have any meaning?

 

[Bodacious]

Do you understand the nature of a boycott? A boycott means we will stop importing products from their country; imports actually rose after O'Reilly called this boycott.

read my link, no they didn't. They might have in those particular months, but what validity do those figures have if you only count those figures?

 

[No Limit]

So because they fought for the US that somehow invalidates their citizenship or that they were soldiers that were part of Canada's military and took the option to go fight in vietnam?

Ok, I am an Iranian citizen. I decide to go to the US army to fight in Iraq. Are you telling me that means that Iran sent troops into Iraq? Pleeeeaaaase.

 

[Absinthe]

So because they fought for the US that somehow invalidates their citizenship or that they were soldiers that were part of Canada's military and took the option to go fight in vietnam?

Canada, as a nation on the whole, and the government, did not send troops to Vietnam.

If a Mexican volunteered for the US Marines, would that suddenly make Mexico your ally?

 

[No Limit]

read my link, no they didn't. They might have in those particular months, but what validity do those figures have if you only count those figures?

THAT MEANS IMPORTS INCREASED!!!! That means the boycott was not effective. What are you trying to say? Where are the billions of dollars lost in imports that O'Reilly claimed?

 

[Bodacious]

Ok, I am an Iranian citizen. I decide to go to the US army to fight in Iraq. Are you telling me that means that Iran sent troops into Iraq? Pleeeeaaaase.

You didn't read my links did you? The Canadian government gave Canadian soldiers permission to go fight in vietnam. It wasn't some average canadian citizen going and joining the army.

 

[No Limit]

read my link, no they didn't. They might have in those particular months, but what validity do those figures have if you only count those figures?

THAT MEANS IMPORTS INCREASED!!!! That means the boycott was not effective. What are you trying to say? Where are the billions of dollars lost in imports that O'Reilly claimed? Look at your own source again, IMPORTS INCREASED since O'Reilly called for a boycott.

 

[Absinthe]

You didn't read my links did you? The Canadian government gave Canadian soldiers permission to go fight in vietnam. It wasn't some average canadian citizen going and joining the army.

Permission =/= Marching orders

 

[No Limit]

You didn't read my links did you? The Canadian government gave Canadian soldiers permission to go fight in vietnam. It wasn't some average canadian citizen going and joining the army.

 

[Bodacious]

THAT MEANS IMPORTS INCREASED!!!! That means the boycott was not effective. What are you trying to say? Where are the billions of dollars lost in imports that O'Reilly claimed?

Again read my link. There is no possible way you can disagree. You think O'relly started his boycott in 2003, right? Imports from France decreased in 2003 - 2004. At least that is what I gather when you say "O'Reilly called for a boycott sometime in mid 03 I believe."

Am I going to have to post screenshots of the imports between 2003-2004?

 

[Absinthe]

Bodacious, just get me one source that details how Canada, as a nation, under the orders of its leaders, sent troops to Vietnam.

Because if I recall correctly, they never did.

 

[Bodacious]

Good job. A Geocities site.

Do you think that memorial was photoshopped or something?

Bodacious, I think you missed the part where it said "under the US flag". That means they volunteered for US military. The Canadian government never sent troops there.

And you missed the part where the Canadian government gave permission for their soldiers to fight in vietnam.

Canada was more intimately involved with the US and our plans to invade Vietnam

Bodacious, I'm curious as to what this actually has to do with Canadian troops actually being deployed in Vietnam.

You wouldn't be trying to shift the topic onto something else, now would you?[/QUOTE]


All it does is prove that Canada had more to do with vietnam than Moore would have you believe.

 

[No Limit]

Again read my link. There is no possible way you can disagree. You think O'relly started his boycott in 2003, right? Imports from France decreased in 2003 - 2004. At least that is what I gather when you say "O'Reilly called for a boycott sometime in mid 03 I believe."

Am I going to have to post screenshots of the imports between 2003-2004?

Dude, what is wrong with you. Let's do the math:

2,255.2 (Feb 2004)
-2,184.0 (February 2003)
_______
74

74 is not a negative number so imports increased. Do you not see this?

 

[Bodacious]

Bodacious, just get me one source that details how Canada, as a nation, under the orders of its leaders, sent troops to Vietnam.

Because if I recall correctly, they never did.

I'm not trying to make that argument, though.


Why does serving in the US army invalidate their citizenship?

 

[No Limit]

Do you think that memorial was photoshopped or something?




And you missed the part where the Canadian government gave permission for their soldiers to fight in vietnam.





Bodacious, I'm curious as to what this actually has to do with Canadian troops actually being deployed in Vietnam.

You wouldn't be trying to shift the topic onto something else, now would you?

All it does is prove that Canada had more to do with vietnam than Moore would have you believe.

No, it proves that Coulter doesn't know what she is talking about. Canda NEVER EVER OFFICIALLY sent troops as Coutler said. Case closed.

 

[No Limit]

I'm not trying to make that argument, though.


Why does serving in the US army invalidate their citizenship?

It has nothing to do with that. CANADA NEVER SENT TROOPS TO VIETNAM.

 

[CptStern]

Canadial Vietnam War Memorial

Canada sends 30k troops to Vietnam under US flag.

Canadian Medal Of Honor recipiant for service in Vietnam.

Canada was more intimately involved with the US and our plans to invade Vietnam

? these were all volunteers

So because they fought for the US that somehow invalidates their citizenship or that they were soldiers that were part of Canada's military and took the option to go fight in vietnam?

..an american expatriate living in canada went to fight for the socialists during the Spanish civil war ...his name: Ernest Hemingway. Was "Papa" fighting for canada or the US? or for Spain? ....I fail to see your point, canada wanted no part of Vietnam ..the Red Scare was an american phenomenon not a canadian one ..any canadian soldiers who fought in vietnam did so of their own accord and without the blessings of the canadian public

 

[Bodacious]

Dude, what is wrong with you. Let's do the math:

2,255.2 (Feb 2004)
-2,184.0 (February 2003)
_______
74

74 is not a negative number so imports increased. Do you not see this?

Dude, whats wrong with you, lets do the math.

Total FOR YEAR 2004: 28,711.7
Total FOR YEAR 2003: 29,219.3
Total is -507.6

-507.6 is a negative number, so imports decreased! Do you not see this?

 

[Bodacious]

I'll let that Canada stuff go now that I see you all don't mind dishonoring what they did in vietnam and you won't budge for anything.

 

[No Limit]

Dude, whats wrong with you, lets do the math.

Total FOR YEAR 2004: 28,711.7
Total FOR YEAR 2003: 29,219.3
Total is -507.6

-507.6 is a negative number, so imports decreased! Do you not see this?

This is too complicated for you and I really don't feel like explaining how imports/exports work. So lets just make this as simple as possible. O'Reilly called for a boycott in June 2003 (I just looked that up, might want to double check as I don't have time right now). Lets look at what happened when he called for this boycott:

May - 2,236.6

June - 2,461.4 (increase from May, meaning the boycott didn't do anything)

July - 2,524.3 (again increase)

Aug - 2,278.3 (finally a decrease but this bouces back up almost instantly and this is a trend for all years in the period of July - Aug, so again this means the boycott didn't do shit)

Sept - 2,704.1 (again, huge increase from Aug and July)

So I ask you, where are the billions lost as O'Reilly said?

 

[No Limit]

I'll let that Canada stuff go now that I see you all don't mind dishonoring what they did in vietnam and you won't budge for anything.

Yes, classic Republican spin; if you disagree you don't support the troops. For christ sake, will you just admit Canda didn't send in any troops?

 

[CptStern]

I'll let that Canada stuff go now that I see you all don't mind dishonoring what they did in vietnam and you won't budge for anything.

what? the war was a quagmire of questionable motives and ethics ...canada wanted no part of it, at the same time we didnt prevent canadians from volunteering. We dont celebrate their acomplishments because there was no cohesive canadian role in vietnam at least not officially. Again I fail to see why you even brought this point up.