Anne Coulter and Bill O'Reilly: Well and Truly Wrong

[Bodacious]

Aren't you a little off topic?

You already lost the argument. Drop it like an adult.

The thread is about O'Reilly being wrong, or lying as people would have him believe. Why don't you say anything about the other pople being off topic.

I only "lost" because people won't acknowledge the facts and instead misrepresent them.

 

[No Limit]

Uh huh. Only taking two months out of a census bereau report and using that as a basis to bash a conservative isn't misrepresentation of facts? What about the rest of the months?

No, I took all the months out that the boycott would have been effective. I try to have a good debate with you and then you try to say I am saying something wrong when I'm not. Prove to me that the boycott worked; you simply can't. No matter how much you try to misrepresent what I said you can't get around that.

No Limit tried to say the same thing, only when he was shown the article of the UCMJ that says every soldier has an obligation to refuse unlawful orders he was silent.

You are so full of crap its not even funny anymore. Anyone who wants to can go read that thread and see who was silent when; go ahead and point them to it. However, I am not going to stoop to the level of this childish bashing and changing the topic when I am wrong. I also won't point out all the times you made an ass of yourself in past especially if I am just making making things up (as you are).

 

[jondy]

The thread is about O'Reilly being wrong, or lying as people would have him believe. Why don't you say anything about the other pople being off topic.

I only "lost" because people won't acknowledge the facts and instead misrepresent them.

Like I said, drop it like an adult. You're chasing your tail in circles. Have some shame.

 

[Bodacious]

No, I took all the months out that the boycott would have been effective. I try to have a good debate with you and then you try to say I am saying something wrong when I'm not. Prove to me that the boycott worked; you simply can't. No matter how much you try to misrepresent what I said you can't get around that.

But the boycott wasn't effective in feb of 2002 was it? So why does that month matter and not the rest? Why do they pull Feb out of their ass?

You are so full of crap its not even funny anymore. Anyone who wants to can go read that thread and see who was silent when; go ahead and point them to it. However, I am not going to stoop to the level of this childish bashing and changing the topic when I am wrong. I also won't point out all the times you made an ass of yourself in past especially if I am just making making things up (as you are).

Typical liberal, when they are wrong they resort to name calling.

 

[Bodacious]

Like I said, drop it like an adult. You're chasing your tail in circles. Have some shame.

Uh huh. I am so sorry I messed up on an internet message board, what will I ever do?

Whatever.

 

[Mechagodzilla]

My point is, liberals have selective memory when it comes to supporting ideals. Clinton was a draft dodger and was elected twice. Bush can be considered a draft dodger and he is equated to Hitler.

Equated to Hitler by who? Who in this thread? Who in this forum? Who in your imagination?

This is utterly irrelevant to the discussion at hand. You are setting up a straw man, knocking it down and then setting it up again in thread after thread.

No-one gives a shit about Bush's war record, and the only reason it was brought up in the first place by anyone was as a response to the whole swift-boat veterans scam.

John Kerry self admittedly comitted war crimes yet he was almost elected president. But oh noes! O'Reilly made a mistake on citing a source and even when he is right about the figures he is still bashed.

Again, you aghast at a man admitting to war crimes to 30 years ago almost becoming president, yet are fully in support of a man who is the president and who will not admit to war crimes today.

Are you unable to see that foolishness behind your argument?

O'Reilly lied about the source, and he lied about the numbers. He said billions. He said it was a real review.

Later, as damage control, he said it was millions. But even that is a faulty conclusion based on misrepresented data. He didn't just 'omit' two months.
He omitted everything but two months.
He only reported two months of losses, and attributed them to his boycott, despite having no evidence that his boycott was the cause.

Lie, lie, lie. There is nothing about his boycott that was true. There was no success. There is no reason to believe there was a success. The slight drop was a regular fluctuation, with nothing pointing to O'Reilly as a cause.

And even a real boycott of this manner, with success, would have been stupid because France is an ally, and this would be practically extortion. "Join my war or lose billions of dollars."

Everything you are saying is wrong, but at least you can dredge up "John Kerry was a criminal 30 years ago." The only point you've ever been vaguely right about and put it on display.
But even then logic proves you to be, at the absolute unreasonable minimum, equally culpable as Kerry supporters by your own standards of "supporting a war criminal, no matter how minor, is always wrong".

It's just one big pile of wrong

 

[Tr0n]

That wasn't hard now was it Bodacious?

 

[Sainku]

Typical liberal

Im really going to be angry at the next person who starts there post with one of the "Typical Liberal" "Typical Republican" things. It just shows you how big a part bias plays in politics, it makes me sick. :flame:

 

[KoreBolteR]

Im really going to be angry at the next person who starts there post with one of the "Typical Liberal" "Typical Republican" things. It just shows you how big a part bias plays in politics, it makes me sick. :flame:

not to mention how most of the media are biased these days, its changing peoples views, and totally directing them in the wrong direction.

 

[Mechagodzilla]

The worst part is, he just used the "typical liberal" thing to distract from the fact that he has no response.

It's actually sorta funny:

Jondyfun: "You are an idiot because you are dodging every point we make."

Bodacious: "Because you called me an idiot, I will dodge your point."

 

[satch919]

My point is, liberals have selective memory when it comes to supporting ideals. Clinton was a draft dodger and was elected twice. Bush can be considered a draft dodger and he is equated to Hitler. John Kerry self admittedly comitted war crimes yet he was almost elected president. But oh noes! O'Reilly made a mistake on citing a source and even when he is right about the figures he is still bashed.

Liberals have selective memory? Yeah, just about as much as a Conservative. They are both the same. If you can't see the errors of your own party, then you're just another puppet for the regime. Clinton may have been a draft dodger, i haven't really looked it up,(i will) but did you ever think that he was elected twice because maybe he was a decent President?

The reason why people go after Bush is because he's a prick with extreme ideas. Not only that but he was running for President which brings up dirt on everyone. Same thing goes for O'Reilly. He makes himself out to be some untouchable, all-knowing guy when in fact, he's a total jerk. He puts people down right and left and has little to no respect for his guests or anyone else. Its easier to hate him.

Anyone that thinks that Anne Coulter is hot has terrible taste in women. If border-line psychosis is your thing then........wow.

 

[bliink]

I will close this thread if it does not come right back on topic. :|

 

[KoreBolteR]

...so is bill oreilly wrong? heh

(back on topic bliink )

 

[Mechagodzilla]

Well, there's really not much more to say. Coulter made up some crazy stuff about Canada and Bill lied, then fumbled in an effort to save face. No-one is really disputing those facts.
And then the thread was done.

 

[satch919]

bodacious, Im just curious about one thing. Im sorry if it seems like we're picking on you but I suppose you're the minority here. Here's my question: Do you find any faults with Bush, the Administration, or Conservative policies. Again, im just curious.

 

[KoreBolteR]

bodacious, Im just curious about one thing. Im sorry if it seems like we're picking on you but I suppose you're the minority here. Here's my question: Do you find any faults with Bush, the Administration, or Conservative policies. Again, im just curious.

hes the minority because all the media sources around the world, except FOX, tend not to be biased towards the terrorists and left wingers.

 

[Tr0n]

hes the minority because all the media sources around the world, except FOX, tend not to be biased towards the terrorists and left wingers.

WTF?

 

[Apos]

You let people like John Kerry get away with comitting atrocities

^^^^ Probably too dumb to know the difference between Bob Kerry and John Kerry.

 

[bliink]

Wow.. its like people just ignore me... Apos, Satch, Bodacious, Mech... none of you can deny you played some part in derailing this.

Bodacious, watch the attitude.

And thats the end of that.

Closed.