Ansar Al-Sunnah executes Marine Prisoners

[CptStern]

One of my favorite movies of all time.

Wolverines!!!

you prove my point

 

[tequilarawks]

I don't know if anyone has mention this yet, but if not, let me point out that we are not technically at war. War was declared on the Saddam regime. They are not in power anymore, and victory was announced a while ago. We are occupying Iraq and helping a new government out with security. What we are dealing with in Iraq are terrorist insurgents. This being the case, the Geneva law for war do not apply, since we are not at war. We aren't dealing with "soldiers" we are dealing with terrorists. We aren't obeying the rules because we ahve to, we are obeying because we choose too.

Also, people seem to forget these days that Saddam murdered some 100,000 people since 1991. I don't remember a source, I'll see if i can get one. Everyone talking about "Oh no, America shouldn't be there, why don't they stay out of other people's business," well if we don't do it who will? Those who commit atrocities need to be held accountable. Now, Saddam will, and he'll hang. Now we are mopping up the mess we've made. Is it a cluster-**** over there? Probably. Have we broken some laws? Yes. Will we break more? Probably. But 2000 KIA vs. 100,000? Everyone is some mother's son, whether they are American, Iraqi, French, British, etc..

I for one choose the lesser of two evils. I'm independant, I call it how I see it. I love guns, I hate terrorists, and Bush is a ****ing moron, but I liked him more than Kerry.

 

[jerkasaur]

wtf is wrong with you? in all seriousness... why do you link to such a horrific site? wtf dont you realize some of the people here are minors? This isnt the first time kerberos. I've been sitting on a video of a marine shooting a wounded iraqi for over a year now ..it isnt graphic in the least but it still shows a person dying so I wont post it

have some respect for the dead ..especially since that site shows dead american citizens ..what if someone here recognised that person?

sure it's terrible if true but have you lost all humanity that for the sake of proving a tenuous point at best you resort to posting violent imagery of real people being killed? ffs sometimes I wonder what's wrong with the youth of today

agree,

about "people" who did this, which i'd rather call them animals, there is something you need to know about it. i'll start with this:
what if a group of "animals" were against christians and wanted to destroy them, that way they would have just read some parts from the Holy Bible and start killing them, so from here i want to tell you there is no such thing in islam, i'll post something complete about this in the next post.

 

[jerkasaur]

We are occupying Iraq and helping a new government out with security. What we are dealing with in Iraq are terrorist insurgents. This being the case, the Geneva law for war do not apply, since we are not at war.

then what happenes to the prisoners in abu-ghoraib and other prisons if there is no Geneva law? they're war prisoners, but there is no law for them huh?
what the H3||happened to the Geneva law when america was using lower-leveled-atomic bombs or whatever they f***ing call it when attacking iraq?
...not to metion thousands of iraqi kids being killed in the city attacks...
oh yeah, i remember, NO ONE CARED back then huh?...

Everyone talking about "Oh no, America shouldn't be there, why don't they stay out of other people's business,"

if you are talking about neighbour countries, well, iran for example, they sure don't love saddam, they were in war for 8 years, a war they did not start,
btw, i'm one of those people who thinks america should mind it's own bussiness. between more than 190 countries, only america cares about the faith of the world? so that means more than 6 billion people are idiots and only bush understands?
oh and who controls the UN? telling it what to do and what not to do? ever heard about it that US didn't let UN check on one of the prisons that was not even in US?
ok,ok, i'll try to keep my temper, nvm the whole thing.
about the reasons that the executors can't be muslims, or related to any real religion:

<about the marines i don't know, but the same looking group has executed diplomatists and journalists in the past couple of years,
in the Quran, it says never fight but for your freedom, it says defend yourselves, as i have read and you could ask anyone. but against who? journalists? volunteered people who go there for help? i don't think so.
yet again, we have this in islam that if someone hits you once, forgive, but if you didn't want to, you should only hit once, as and like he/she did. cutting throats is not a good example.
there are more than 100 reasons why these bastards are not muslims.
i'm a muslim, i know what islam is about.(at least as much as i can get from it)
this, is not islam.

people relating themselves to imam groups and stuff, like imam houssein group: BULLS***, we don't even believe in those exagurated mourings some people have for imam houssein (cutting themselves), now we believe in shooting women in the head? (not to mention that in a war, a muslim is not to kill women or children, or even old people who can not fight, now read the Quran and do such things? this is also one of the reasons that iran could not have atomic bomb, cause when it 's dropped in a place, it destroys everything, including children and women, which is forbiden in islam).
anyway, i strongly ask american and iraqi families to accept my condulences,(damn i don't know how to write...)

war is nothing but betrayal, even if not to eachother, to ourselves...

 

[Adidajs]

this, is not islam.

people relating themselves to imam groups and stuff, like imam houssein group: BULLS***, we don't even believe in those exagurated mourings some people have for imam houssein (cutting themselves), now we believe in shooting women in the head? (not to mention that in a war, a muslim is not to kill women or children, or even old people who can not fight, now read the Quran and do such things? this is also one of the reasons that iran could not have atomic bomb, cause when it 's dropped in a place, it destroys everything, including children and women, which is forbiden in islam).
anyway, i strongly ask american and iraqi families to accept my condulences,(damn i don't know how to write...)

war is nothing but betrayal, even if not to eachother, to ourselves...

i agree wholeheartedly, this isn't a true reflection of islam, but iran, could not have atomic bombs?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4449860.stm
there are very few nations that would deny iran's interest in the nuclear bomb dept, despite iran's-"we only want civilian nuclear power"-stance. If you think Iran wouldn't do all it could to obtain a nuclear arsenal, you're kidding yourself.

 

[jerkasaur]

well, about iran having nuclear bomb,
america has it, so does UK and russia, and my god even Isreal,
how come iran is the third country in the world that could preduce the needs for nuclear energy itself (Zirconium sponge i mean) and then not have it? it doesn't make sence at all, at least not to me.

i agree wholeheartedly, this isn't a true reflection of islam,

thanks, hope everyone understands these bastards are not muslims.

 

[bliink]

This discussion has gone off topic.