Antichrist

xombine

Tank
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
2,642
Reaction score
0
Just watched this yesterday...anyone else seen it? I knew what was coming, but by god it was still brutal watching it. I would say read the Wiki synopsis if you haven't heard about it, but that would just spoil the fun of seeing it. :p Willem Dafoe putting on a good show as usual, specially when he's butt nekkid. A little slow getting going, but there's no reason not to finish watching this one.

http://www.antichristthemovie.com/?language=en
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antichrist_(film)
 
i've thought of seeing this one, might rent it when it's on dvd
 
Was watching the first 3 mins of the movie, I really wasn't expecting that penetration shot... I was eating at the time...
 
i wonder if that was really DaFoe penetrating her.

BTW i'd do the same thing if I walked in on my parents doing that.
 
I bet whoever it was, wanted to make sure there was multiple takes of it, to be safe.
 
I definitely want to see this. Sounds very well-done and disturbing. Much moreso than so much else in terms of horror.
 
after having watched the whole thing, all I can say is: what the ****? I don't know what to say about it. It's original, it's pretty terrifying, it's bizarre, it's nihilistic, it's DANISH!

I dunno how much I like it really.
 
i wonder if that was really DaFoe penetrating her.

BTW i'd do the same thing if I walked in on my parents doing that.
The wiki article says it's a "porno double" lol

But yes, disturbing but fantastic at the same time. :p
 
I would say read the Wiki synopsis if you haven't heard about it, but that would just spoil the fun of seeing it.

I have heard about it, and I have read the synopsis. It sounds like absolute trash. A movie made to be brutal/disturbing/shocking, just for the hell of it. I wouldn't watch this sort of garbage even if I was payed to do it. /rant
 
While I'm reticent to make similar comments, I pretty much agree with Remus.

I know it's one thing to read a wikipedia article and another to actually watch the film. But I can't say I'm ever going to feel compelled to sit down and subject myself to something like this. I already tried that with Irreversible and I regret every second I saw of it.
 
I usually don't get excessively disturbed by movies but I had to turn this puppy off within about five minutes of starting it. I typically looove dark/disturbing movies, but flicks like this that go above-and-beyond to freak you out just sort of annoy me.
 
I saw it a few weeks back. I hear it get all kinds of praise from critics, but honestly, its not that good. It was just another art house flick. A really gory, messed up art house flick.
 
Worthless piece of dog shit, goddamnit! Sorry, I usually try to be open minded with most art house films... I enjoyed Lars von Trier's Dogville but this, this I couldn't watch to the end, not only for the excessive gore porn but because it didn't really go anywhere. If there was a genuine message Trier intended to convey here then please tell me what the f*ck it is.

It gets one smashed penis out of ten from me.
 
Lars von Trier? Willem Dafoe? I AM SOLD!
 
While I'm reticent to make similar comments, I pretty much agree with Remus.

I know it's one thing to read a wikipedia article and another to actually watch the film. But I can't say I'm ever going to feel compelled to sit down and subject myself to something like this. I already tried that with Irreversible and I regret every second I saw of it.

Saw Irreversible when I was 14.

*Flexes Muscles*
 
Man, I dont ever want to watch that movie. The synopsis was disturbing enough as it is.
 
Man, I dont ever want to watch that movie. The synopsis was disturbing enough as it is.

The synopsis doesn't even scratch the iceberg. Hell, my roommate gave me a fairly meaty summary of the movie and it didn't even begin to prepare me for how disturbing and ****ed up it actually was.
 
Back
Top