- Joined
- May 5, 2004
- Messages
- 3,994
- Reaction score
- 70
For those who are out of the loop, Apple has been hard on Samsung's ass (in a long series of hard-on-assedness toward basically every hardware company under the sun) about the Galaxy Tab supposedly being a patent infringement on the iPad. Their claim, among other things, was that the following design drawing from Samsung:
was somehow an infringement on the iPad's design. Because, you know, you can patent a cube shape with glass.
For the UK ruling, here's what happened:
http://admin.androidcentral.com/uk-...blicly-admit-samsung-did-not-copy-ipad-design
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18895384
They're gonna be sore for a while after this one. I just hope the appeal gets thrown.
was somehow an infringement on the iPad's design. Because, you know, you can patent a cube shape with glass.
For the UK ruling, here's what happened:
http://admin.androidcentral.com/uk-...blicly-admit-samsung-did-not-copy-ipad-design
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18895384
Bloomberg reports that UK Judge Colin Birss has ordered Apple to post notice on the Apple UK website -- as well as Financial Times, the Daily Mail, Guardian Mobile magazine, and T3 -- stating that Samsung did not copy the iPad's design. This comes on the heels of the ruling from the British High Court stating that the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1, 7.7 and 8.9 are sufficiently different from Apple's design, and that all of them are strongly based on prior art. Apple must leave notice on their UK website for six months informing consumers of the ruling.
They're gonna be sore for a while after this one. I just hope the appeal gets thrown.