Avatars.

Status
Not open for further replies.

GhostValkyrie

Newbie
Joined
Oct 5, 2003
Messages
2,319
Reaction score
0
I didn't want to PM Munro, he tends to be busy, so I was wondering if a Mod could help.

Is there some way we could have a poll, or something, to get the pixels of Avatars from 50x50 to 100x100? I don't want to make a poll for it to not matter.
 
How about someone who was a Mod before I was a Mod...
Nothing personal.
Like maybe Badger, or Starmonkey?

Is Starmonkey still the site Tech?

BTW: Are you just working on the News, or are you a Mod that specific job?
 
Have to agree with Pendragon, atleast partially. The current avatar dimensions fit nicely with the name bar, so while I don't disagree it'd be best to alter both, which would be a pain. I'm happy with the current dimensions though.
 
I agree, the dimensions are nice and uniformed, but seeing having the pic bigger would be nice. I don't know, just thought it would be cool. If they had to and wanted to, they could put the signatures next to the names, so that there wasn't this gaping, empyt space.
 
We've been fine with this size avatar for some time now. I see no reason to change it.
 
I can see why 50x50 is considered "small" and I suppose having it a bit bigger, like 60x60 wouldn't affect the name bar. I'll mention it to Munro but I'm not sure if he'll approve.
 
The size is good as it is, no need to change it.

P.S. I'm a mod... But not on this forum.:E
 
i'd like to a see a little bigger also, as long as it doesn't affect the layout dimensions, as has been mentioned. i moderate my life.. to a small degree.
 
i can go up to 60x60 but not more. Again, its the posts i want to read not look at avatars all the time.
 
I would like the avatar size a bit bigger to, btw i dont like the name bar..but hey its not my board
 
100x100 pixels is crazy, because it would mean having to up the allowed avatar filesize - pages would take far longer to load.

60x60, why bother? What are you going to do with those extra few pixels that you can't with 50x50?
 
50 is a tad small but I dont see us going all the way up to 100. 60? Sure we'll mull that one over but I think the sizes are fine as they are :)
 
I don't know if this is possible but maybe you could have the avatar as a link. The avatar could be like a thumbnail and link to the full size picture as somesort of attachment in the users profile.

You could get the best of both worlds.
 
The Mullinator said:
I don't know if this is possible but maybe you could have the avatar as a link. The avatar could be like a thumbnail and link to the full size picture as somesort of attachment in the users profile.

You could get the best of both worlds.

You can use a pic that does that.... ;)
 
GhostValkyrie said:
I didn't want to PM Munro, he tends to be busy, so I was wondering if a Mod could help.

Is there some way we could have a poll, or something, to get the pixels of Avatars from 50x50 to 100x100? I don't want to make a poll for it to not matter.
i say 120 x 120 pix are good... i used to have that size on ZE before i got banned by 2gayed admins (bro and sister) who where never fit for the possition in the 1st place some of the outher mods cooda uped to admin and then members to mods but the world blows cock dousent it?... i say 120x120 with sizeless sigs aslong as its not so !@#$in huge
 
Imo they could be enlarged by 10 or 20 pixels.
 
50x50 is fine. After getting used to the small avatar+no signature pic policy of this forum, I can't stand the huge avatars and sigpics people use at other forums anymore. So, right, keep it at 50.
 
100x100 is too big.

Look at the pic in my profile. That's 98x98, seeing 15 of them on each page is way OTT.
 
The size is fine, but allowing bitmaps would be nice.

Edit: Increasing the length to 100 is an awesome, awesome idea too.
Height is the only major issue.
 
i hate it when the slow ppl lag the rest of the world down if your running your res at 800x600 your a totall idiout and if your still running a 14.8k-56k your an even bigger idiout... cable and higher is required for life thees days get a flat screen and good card then shove it up to 1024 or 2048!!!!! chris_D that 100x100 icon is small as hell... 120 120 is good for avaters... and a inf sig limit (keep it resonable size) is good for siggys...
 
Excuse me, but not everyone has the money or the means to to do those things.

Don't be so arrogant.
 
Also, some people may have some class and style. I want a stylish and clean forum... not a kindergarden forum with fingerpaint pics all over the walls (because some of the sig pics do look like a 3 year old made em).
 
comradebadger cable is cheap and a flat screen is only 300$ so dont tell me you dont have the $ to get that... hell a minimal job can buy that
 
$300 is a hell of a lot of money, especially on a computer (admittedly my machine cost that, but it was built over time). And cable is not cheap, at least not in England.
 
XenoSpirit said:
comradebadger cable is cheap and a flat screen is only 300$ so dont tell me you dont have the $ to get that... hell a minimal job can buy that

Not everybody has the money to pay for cable internet or buy a new monitor. $300 WTF. Last time I checked that was a lot of money. Seriously you need to grow up, I don't know anybody who can piss away $300 on a whim. When I upgrade my computer, I usually think long and hard to see if I can afford and am willing to spend the money. You need to get a life or something because your view of reality is just flat out distorted.

Plus, even if you have job, its not like that job is just meant for computer gaming. A lot of us have other obligations in life, computer gaming is just a hobby. Just because you happen to some expensive piece of equipment does not entitle you to force everybody on it. Hell, if your so arrogant, why don't you find another forum to go to and make everybody happy.

Do you have real life expenses? Hell, I have to save up $200 right now so I can replace the starter in my car. So you expect me to let my car die in the next couple of months just so I can make you happy?
 
i ante force'n you to do jack shit i just think slow users shouldnt lag down evreyone else.. Όλο το χαλάζι στο idiout
 
XenoSpirit said:
i ante force'n you to do jack shit i just think slow users shouldnt lag down evreyone else.. Όλο το χαλάζι στο idiout

When did you determine that you were the gold standard to be copied? Slow users have just as much right to be in this forum as you or me.

[Edit]: Deleted. Shouldn't have wrote that.
 
i dint say you dint have the right to be here i sayed slow users shouldnt lag the rest of the world down ~ this flame war is apealing οι αργοί χρήστες φυσούν
 
Can the flames guys, I know I was partially responsible. But still.

In my opinion, the forums are fine as they are.
 
XenoSpirit said:
i ante force'n you to do jack shit i just think slow users shouldnt lag down evreyone else.. ??? ?? ?????? ??? idiout
Its not exactly my fault that highspeed internet providers are too lazy to get off their fat asses and hook my rural area up to cable. I have the money, need, and desire for highspeed but unfortuantly I am unable to get it.

No im not trying to flame you. I just hate lazy internet providers. :dozey:
 
comon 120x120 pix's atleast add sigs ...только 56kers всасывают
 
This has gone down hill enough.

If somebody would like to post a poll asking the question of increasing the avatar sizes we may at least consider it, but I feel like most people are happy with the avatars the way they are.

For now, this "round-in-circles" conversation is over.

Closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top