BF1942 or UT2004

[ray_MAN]

Which game is better? I must say BF1942 is nothing compared to UT2004. Ut2004 has physics, graphics, and originality. My pick UT2004.

 

[Dedalus]

BF has Desert Combat just started downloading UT2004 so i'll let you know how it is, i'm hoping it's as good as everyone says it is.

 

[Prince of China]

Ahh! You bitches! Stop comparing BattleField to Unreal Tournament 2k4! It's nothing like Unreal Tournament! The only reference it has to Unreal Tournament are the vehicles, that's why people compare them...it's sad really!
UT2k4 is way better! I've seen to much BF vs. UT2k4 threads...
/me dies;(

Now look at what you've done..

 

[63]

there is no way to compare these 2 games, they are both entirely different! they're not even in the same genre! But I do agree with UT2004 being "superior" atm, but I accidently voted for BF1942 cause I thought it was Vietnam! now Vietnam will kick ass!!

 

[Prince of China]

but I accidently voted for BF1942

grrrrrrrrr.

 

[The Mullinator]

ut2004 because it has much more support for those who play single player (due to a lack of a decent internet connection).

 

[chu]

ut2004 because it has much more support for those who play single player (due to a lack of a decent internet connection).

you make it sound like a bad thing..... ;(

 

[Sui]

wHEN bf1942 : battlefront comes out (NOT the mod, an official game) u will be playing with luke all day. star wars r0xors

 

[craig]

UT2k4 because on a 1meg line it DOESNT LAG!!

 

[Direwolf]

As I'm sure I've mentioned a million times, I'm a Battlefield nut so BF gets my vote. What it lacks in flash it makes up for in massive battles over huge areas. And mods don't hurt it either.
Edit: And something's seriously wrong if you're lagging with ANYTHING on a 1meg line.

 

[The Mullinator]

you make it sound like a bad thing..... ;(

It isn't a bad thing? I have a 28.8k connection and it seems pretty bad. :rolling:

 

[Loke]

I agree with Pendragon, you can't really compare BF1942 with UT2004. And right now we haven’t played the whole game of UT2k4, just a demo with 5 maps.

But anyway, we don't need to be so important here, it's just a poll.
So my vote goes for Battlefield 1942, why I voted was because I like WW2 with historical maps and weapons style a little better than sci-fi and laser weapons.

 

[thenerdguy]

ut2004 got my vote.
I got bfwhen it 1st came out abd it sucked, I tried playing it again last month and it still sucks! And yes i dled DC and i think it sucks too.

 

[crabcakes66]

Im not into "tourney" style games.....

as a matter of fact id rather play the original pong for 6 hours than play a game like that for 5 minutes......

can someone explian to me how Ut2004 is more original than bf42(ray_man?).....sounds like the same old garbage to me.

Bf42 is the first succsessful game of its kind.

if anything UT2004 is the exact opposite of original.......

its UT/Quake/doom/HL with better gfx and vehicles....... wow...how incredible :|

 

[Maxi]

UT2004 got my vote, that game ROCKS!