Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Can't the scientists look at the body on that picture, or did the people behind this burn the corpse after taking a picture and extracting some DNA?
da pic link isnt workin for me so i cant pss judgement on if its real or not but if it is then i dey should clone it :naughty:
Ok, I'm an expert retard translator, here goes:
The picture link is not working for me so I can't pass judgment on if it's real or not, but if it is, then they should clone it. *naughty smiley*
Indeed.
I digress.
Worst 'shop ever.
One of the two samples of DNA said to prove the existence of the Bigfoot came from a human and the other was 96 percent from an opossum, according to Curt Nelson, a scientist at the University of Minnesota who performed the DNA analysis.
Biscardi said the DNA samples may not have been taken correctly and may have been contaminated, and that he would proceed with an autopsy of the alleged Bigfoot remains, currently in a freezer at an undisclosed location.
Expert Bigfoot tracker Tom Biscardi thought that Matthew Whitton and Rick Dyer's claim to have found the monster was genuine at first.
They had given him a sample from the body which matched ape/human DNA.
After paying them a fee to hand over the body, Biscardi's team was taken to the body in Georgia.
Private detective Kull said that they had to thaw out the frozen corpse to investigate it.
"Within one hour we were able to see the partially exposed head," Kulls said.
Later, upon discovering he had been victim to a hoax he called the duo at their California hotel.