British MP,says what needs to be said! (little funny inside)

[Warbie]

He was a twat on Big Brother, though. The guy was living in his own little world - paranoid, constantly jumping to wrong conclusions, a bully, pretentious, a hypocrite, completely full of shit with severe problems with even the most basic of judgement. I've never seen anyone so wrong who believed they were so right.

 

[VictimOfScience]

Man, this guy really is a prick.

He is, of course, very right about the typical bias that everyone in the world seems to have for Israel.

 

[No Limit]

Doesnt make them right, as the views are pretty one-sided.
Just as we're jumping up at one-sided right-winger ranting, we should also jump up at one-sided left-winger ranting.
Especially if the guy doesnt even have the balls to let her finish a sentance.
Thats the main reason he was destroying her, she wasnt allowed to answer with more than 1 or 2 words without him ranting again, + lets not forget as reporter she was interviewing him, not full-scale debating...
Her job is to interview him, and poke at some of the statements he's making, which was hardly possible with such a constant barrage of spam.

He had what 9 minutes? That's not a very long time to refute all the bullshit israel propogenda these news organizations have been spewing for the 2 weeks prior to that interview. And when the premise of the question is bullshit (why do you, mr galloway, support terrorists) you can not give a rational response. To be fair to that woman she didn't know what the hell she was saying, none of them do. They just read off a card and hope something like that never happens or they make total asses out of themselves.

I love Galloway, all of you that say he is a prick are probably correct (I don't know, I never met him) but I will bet you guys can't really dispute what he is saying. The man has balls.

 

[Ome_Vince]

Israeli propaganda?
I havent heard much positivity on Israel, on either CNN or Dutch TV, what are you talking about?
That some reporters refer to Hezbollah as a terrorist organisation?

As for this guys tactic: make sure the opponent cant say anything back longer than 3 words.
Then build-up on assumptions.

She asked him why he supported Hezbollah, he took off from there.
As for disputing what he's saying:
He mentions Israel was occupying Southern Lebanon as an excuse for Hezbollah calling them "resistance to occupation", i'd like to know what he's talking about. The Shabab Farms in the Golan Heights? That 35km area was part of Syria.
Perhaps he was refering to the Syrian total occupation of Lebanon, yet that didnt justify or spawn terrorism in Syria by Hezbollah, hmm.
Perhaps he should read the agenda of Hezbollah next time before spamming.
The UN concluded the full withdrawal of the IDF, the guy is talking out of his ass.

And, If not letting your opponent finish a sentance is balls, then yeah he certainly has those.

 

[No Limit]

Israeli propaganda?
I havent heard much positivity on Israel, on either CNN or Dutch TV, what are you talking about?
That some reporters refer to Hezbollah as a terrorist organisation?

Are you ****ing kidding me? Please tell me you are kidding. Have you watched even 2 minutes of CNN or any other american media in the last 2 weeks? Kofi annon claims that the UN building bombed was not an accident and he has evidance to back it up the media only reports his accusations, it does not report on any of the evidance and makes him seem like a whacko. I have plenty more examples, there is no way you can actually believe the coverage of this isn't biased.

As for this guys tactic: make sure the opponent cant say anything back longer than 3 words.
Then build-up on assumptions.

Again, he had 9 minutes to dispute weeks of false reporting.

She asked him why he supported Hezbollah, he took off from there.
As for disputing what he's saying:
He mentions Israel was occupying Southern Lebanon as an excuse for Hezbollah calling them "resistance to occupation", i'd like to know what he's talking about. The Shabab Farms in the Golan Heights? That 35km area was part of Syria.

And Syria says its part of lebanon. This whole situation is a little more complicated than the american media would like you to think.

Perhaps he was refering to the Syrian total occupation of Lebanon, yet that didnt justify or spawn terrorism in Syria by Hezbollah, hmm.

Syria shares the same religious views as Hezbollah. This is what the decades of war have been over, religion. It is really hard for westerners to understand that for some reason.

Perhaps he should read the agenda of Hezbollah next time before spamming.
The UN concluded the full withdrawal of the IDF, the guy is talking out of his ass.

Please, enlighten me. Post the agenda of hezbollah for everyone to read as you seem to know more about it than anyone else here.

And, If not letting your opponent finish a sentance is balls, then yeah he certainly has those.

His objective was to debunk all the bullshit these media "oranizations" have been spewing over the weeks, it wasn't to be nice to them. He suceeded.

 

[Ome_Vince]

Are you ****ing kidding me? Please tell me you are kidding. Have you watched even 2 minutes of CNN or any other american media in the last 2 weeks? Kofi annon claims that the UN building bombed was not an accident and he has evidance to back it up the media only reports his accusations, it does not report on any of the evidance and makes him seem like a whacko. I have plenty more examples, there is no way you can actually believe the coverage of this isn't biased.

-CNN is a british news agency if i recall correctly
-I watch it daily
-You must have not listened to Mr Anan, this is what he said:
"shocked and deeply distressed by the apparently deliberate targeting" of the "clearly marked U.N. post at Khiyam."
AMERICAN SOURCE

Media is always biased, from both Leftist and Right-winger reporters/news editors.
Though that report wasnt very biased, it reported Mr Annan's suspicions, and reports from what each of the leaders said.

Again, he had 9 minutes to dispute weeks of false reporting.

Ah, so that ungrounded claim justifies his ranting over what anybody else has to say.

And Syria says its part of lebanon. This whole situation is a little more complicated than the american media would like you to think.

Heh, its not, though i believe the UN over Syria who doesnt even recognise Lebanon and pictures it as a "greater syria".
Maybe thats why they annexed it a while back.

Also, American Media? How does UN sound to you?

Here something interesting:

Syria has consistently supported Lebanon's claim that the Shebaa Farms are part of Lebanon and not Syrian territory. At the same time, though, Syria does not recognize Lebanon. Not only does it not have diplomatic relations with Lebanon, but in Syrian textbooks Lebanon appears as part of "Greater Syria."

SOURCE

Seems like Hezbollah should be more scared of these guys

Syria shares the same religious views as Hezbollah. This is what the decades of war have been over, religion. It is really hard for westerners to understand that for some reason.

Maybe some, but hypocracy drips right through their actions.
I wish people would listen to what these people actually have to say. Both Hezbollah and Hamas repeat often what they vow, intend and on what they are doing.
Turn on some Mideast media, and you'll see.

Please, enlighten me. Post the agenda of hezbollah for everyone to read as you seem to know more about it than anyone else here.

Most of the stuff i just get from: HERE
Their Ideology is pretty interesting...
O, and this is excluding all the "interesting" stuff Nasrallah has stated, written and promoted along the years.

His objective was to debunk all the bullshit these media "oranizations" have been spewing over the weeks, it wasn't to be nice to them. He suceeded.

Are you refering to certain newsstations in the US?, for please state the enormous amounts of biased media here in Europe or the rest of the world which are so "pro Israel".
I havent seen much positive reaction to what Israel is doing.

Is this about certain media calling Hezbollah a terrorist organisation?

 

[No Limit]

-CNN is a british news agency if i recall correctly

No, they are american. However, they have CNN international which I actually respect more than the american cnn. Problem is I don't get it so I can't really comment on their coverage. American CNN along with all other american media is extremely biased.

-You must have not listened to Mr Anan, this is what he said:
"shocked and deeply distressed by the apparently deliberate targeting" of the "clearly marked U.N. post at Khiyam."
AMERICAN SOURCE

No, I heard exactly what he said. I don't have time to look at the article but Im guessing they don't tell you why he said it. Let me guess, you don't even know why he said it, right?

Media is always biased, from both Leftist and Right-winger reporters/news editors.

Show me a program that claims to report the news in american media being biased toward the left. I hear this shit all the time but I never see any facts behind that claim.

Ah, so that ungrounded claim justifies his ranting over what anybody else has to say.

What ungrounded claim are you talking about. The fact, as I stated it, is the media is extremely biased toward Israel, I have not seen any examples to prove otherwise but I can give you a whole page of how they are biased toward israel. The questions she was throwing at Galloway were similar to why do you support terrorism or why do you offend the victims of Hezbollah violance (something he never did). These are not rational questions and again the entire point he was trying to make was that the media is biased in its reporting of this conflict. What in that sense do you not agree with him on?

Heh, its not, though i believe the UN over Syria who doesnt even recognise Lebanon and pictures it as a "greater syria".
Maybe thats why they annexed it a while back.

So you don't think Syria has a right to do whatever it wants with the land given to it by the UN and it is Israel's right to decide what should be done?

Maybe some, but hypocracy drips right through their actions.
I wish people would listen to what these people actually have to say. Both Hezbollah and Hamas repeat often what they vow, intend and on what they are doing.
Turn on some Mideast media, and you'll see.

What hypocracy?

I havent seen much positive reaction to what Israel is doing.

What news organization in Europe do you watch mostly so I can go through some of their transcripts? Also, are you not from the US? I assumed for some reason you were from here.

Is this about certain media calling Hezbollah a terrorist organisation?

Not necessarily, its about the claim that Israel is bombing Lebanese civillians in the name of fighting terrorists.

 

[ComradeBadger]

He was a twat on Big Brother, though. The guy was living in his own little world - paranoid, constantly jumping to wrong conclusions, a bully, pretentious, a hypocrite, completely full of shit with severe problems with even the most basic of judgement. I've never seen anyone so wrong who believed they were so right.

Agreed.

 

[Nemesis6]

Galloway is:

Antisemitic - http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=19756&only

Sick - Well, look at his support of HizbAllah. And he was friends with Uday Hussein(One of Saddam Hussein's mass-murdering sons)

Creepy/twisted - http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y207/mike_jericho/GGleo.jpg

Oh, by the way, does it count for anything that he thinks that murdering the British Prime Minister Tony Blair is "morally justified"?

All in all, a pretty disgusting individual. And anyone who supports him is, too.

 

[mortiz]

Creepy/twisted - http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y207/mike_jericho/GGleo.jpg

Worst...picture...ever.

My eyes!

 

[Mechagodzilla]

It is spelt "HizbALLAH", not "HizbAllah".

But I am glad that people like y'all are thinking rationally about the situation.
"His intentionally gross picture is gross and so are you!"

That's the spirit.

 

[Nemesis6]

Worst...picture...ever.

My eyes!

Now that you mention it, I think I just might need a little phychological help to supress the mental copy of that image now stored in my brain. Or I could just wash my eyeballs with acid.

 

[Mechagodzilla]

Do it.

Seriously, burn your eyes off in the name of Israel.

You're not working for Allah ...are you?

 

[DaMaN]

Galloway is:

Antisemitic - http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=19756&only

Don't mistake anti-semitism (hatred towards all jewish people) for anti-zionism (opposition to the existence of the State of Israel as a Jewish state)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Zionism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Semitism
Yet I can't seem to find much anti-semitism or anti-zionism in his speech... Am I perhaps missing something? What Galloway is saying is:

...nobody serious, outside the lunatic asylum of Richard Perle's circle, any longer believes that the invasion of an Arab Muslim country by hundreds of thousands of Crusading soldiers has done anything to make the world a more peaceful place.

Sick - Well, look at his support of HizbAllah. And he was friends with Uday Hussein(One of Saddam Hussein's mass-murdering sons)

I fail to see how his support of Hizballah is "sick" - he clearly defended his position in the link in the front page.

Creepy/twisted - http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y207/mike_jericho/GGleo.jpg

I fail to see how this relates. (Though it is fairly disturbing, I find Israel invading Lebanon 100 times more disturbing)

Oh, by the way, does it count for anything that he thinks that murdering the British Prime Minister Tony Blair is "morally justified"?

Where are you getting your information?

From the point of view of someone who has seen their country invaded and their family blown apart it’s possible, of course, for them to construct a moral justification. But I’ve made my position clear. I would not support anyone seeking to assassinate the Prime Minister. That’s why I said in the interview I would report to the authorities any such plot that I knew of.

What I did make abundantly clear to Piers Morgan in the GQ interview is that I would like to see Tony Blair in front of a war crimes tribunal for sending this country to war illegally and for the appalling human consequences which resulted. That’s what I will continue to press for.

http://www.georgegalloway.com/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/nolavconsole/ukfs_news/hi/newsid_5020000/newsid_5022500/bb_wm_5022506.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/nolavconsole/...s=1&nbwm=1&bbwm=1&bbram=1&nol_storyid=5022502

-DaMaN

 

[Ome_Vince]

No, they are american. However, they have CNN international which I actually respect more than the american cnn. Problem is I don't get it so I can't really comment on their coverage. American CNN along with all other american media is extremely biased.

American media = biased, so is all media. Probably American media is more biased right-wing, but European media i see here are mostly very biased left-wing.

No, I heard exactly what he said. I don't have time to look at the article but Im guessing they don't tell you why he said it. Let me guess, you don't even know why he said it, right?

Yes i do, i've heard the facts and argumentation. Yet my comment was on your choice of words, and the claim of proof.

Show me a program that claims to report the news in american media being biased toward the left. I hear this shit all the time but I never see any facts behind that claim.

I'm not American, so i dont know, i'm European, and see European media, and there's alot of left-winger bias here.

What ungrounded claim are you talking about. The fact, as I stated it, is the media is extremely biased toward Israel, I have not seen any examples to prove otherwise but I can give you a whole page of how they are biased toward israel. The questions she was throwing at Galloway were similar to why do you support terrorism or why do you offend the victims of Hezbollah violance (something he never did). These are not rational questions and again the entire point he was trying to make was that the media is biased in its reporting of this conflict. What in that sense do you not agree with him on?

"similar"? She asks how he justifies his support for Hezbollah and its leader, and thats similar to asking why he supports Terrorism?

I agree the media is often biased, though his assumptions carried that way to far by building on her questions like that.

So you don't think Syria has a right to do whatever it wants with the land given to it by the UN and it is Israel's right to decide what should be done?

Syria doesnt even recognise or have diplomatic relations with Lebanon, which it sees as "Greater Syria". I'm looking forward to how that would happen.

What hypocracy?

What news organization in Europe do you watch mostly so I can go through some of their transcripts? Also, are you not from the US? I assumed for some reason you were from here.

Nope, i'm Dutch, and unfortunatly, you cant go through their transcripts, for they're all in Dutch
As for the bias, here the media is mostly controlled by Left-wingers, accusing every right-winger of Nazism, which has led to alot of riots and frustrations.
Its reached such a level where Pim Fortuyn, whom's party had several Muslims and foreigners, was accused of being an Extremist-right winger by left political parties and the a media campaign because one of his points was we should take care of refugese locally, instead of pulling them all into the country.
A few months later, a leftist extremist shot and killed him. People here slowly are getting fed-up with lefty extremist attitude.
Funny how dispite this violance (which has never taken place by right-wingers), the media-bias is we all should be afraid of right-wingers because they're all Hitler.

O, and for your information, i Vote central, not left or right.

I can imagine if your American, you dispise right-wing media bias, but thats how I feel here where i come from.
Luckily its changing slowly, and i hope it stays in the middle, and not topple over to the right...

Not necessarily, its about the claim that Israel is bombing Lebanese civillians in the name of fighting terrorists.

I'm refering to the accusations of biased media.
Should news reporters and media take off on unproven, uncredible conspiracy theories?
No, their job is to report what happened, leave those stories to the magazines, tv documentaries etc.

 

[Solaris]

"I don't like him becuase of big brother..."

Imagine getting locked up with a group of twats for 2 weeks.
He's a fantastic speaker and I'm behind him 100%.

Just saw the video, awesome.

 

[gick]

Just saw the video, awesome.

Supporting a terrorist organisation and refusing to condemn their killing of civilians = not awesome.

 

[Solaris]

Supporting a terrorist organisation and refusing to condemn their killing of civilians = not awesome.

He doesn't support them, he merely supports the right of Lebanon to defend itself. And isn't going to blame Hezbulallah for the violence.

 

[gick]

He doesn't support them, he merely supports the right of Lebanon to defend itself. And isn't going to blame Hezbulallah for the violence.

Failure to condemn = tacit approval as far as i'm concerned. I mean, more or less everything else he said was pretty right on, I just didnt like the way that as soon the interviewer mentioned something about Hezbollah deliberately killing civilians he completely dodged the question.

 

[Solaris]

Failure to condemn = tacit approval as far as i'm concerned. I mean, more or less everything else he said was pretty right on, I just didnt like the way that as soon the interviewer mentioned something about Hezbollah deliberately killing civilians he completely dodged the question.

He wasn't there to issue a statement. He was trying to get the truth out to the viewers, and when that interviewer asked him "Why do you support hizbullah?" He told her how preposterous that was.

 

[Rupertvdb]

This guy is my local MP and so I feel I have ever so slightly more right than most to call him a ****ing crook scumbag. You should all join in..."****ing crook scumbag" "****ing crook scumbag"

To everyone who was impressed by what he was saying, listen to the man again, it's bullshit.

He has political motivation for getting behind militant groups, his (and my) area happens to have a huge concentration of middle-eastern individuals and a not insignificant proportion find the tone of his rhetoric appealling. This means votes for him, more time in power, more money, influence and limelight.

This guy was investigated for manipulating a ****ing charity on trips to the middle east, make of that what you will:

Corruption allegations

Mariam Appeal

In 1998 Galloway founded the Mariam Appeal, intended "to campaign against sanctions on Iraq which are having disastrous effects on the ordinary people of Iraq". The campaign was named after Mariam Hamza, a single child flown by the fund from Iraq to Britain to receive treatment for leukaemia. The intention was to raise awareness of the suffering and death of hundreds of thousands of other Iraqi children due to lack of suitable medicines and facilities, and to campaign for the lifting of the western sanctions that were seen by many as responsible for that situation. The campaign won Galloway press coverage, first positive then increasingly negative, as allegations arose that funds were misappropriated and used to pay his wife and driver.

The fund was at the centre of a further scrutiny during the 2003 Gulf war, with allegations of lavish spending on Galloway's regular trips to the Middle East, including first class travel, luxury hotel accommodation, and consumption of expensive champagne and caviar. [citation needed] Galloway, however, denied that he had misused any funds raised for the Mariam Appeal and pointed out that it was not unreasonable for money from a campaign fund to be used to pay for the travel expenses of campaigners. Although the Mariam Appeal was never a registered charity and never intended to be such, it was investigated by the Charity Commission. The report of this year-long inquiry, published in June 2004[60], found that the Mariam Appeal was doing charitable work (and so should properly have been registered with them), but did not substantiate allegations that any funds had been misused. Finding 12 of the report states however that "the Commission has been unable to obtain all the books and records of the Appeal. Mr Galloway, the first Chairman of the Appeal, has stated that this documentation was sent to Amman and Baghdad in 2001 when Fawaz Zuriekat became Chairman of the Appeal. Mr Galloway has informed the Commission that this documentation is no longer under the control of the original trustees of the Appeal and cannot be located by them. Mr Galloway confirmed that the Appeal did not produce annual profit and loss accounts or balance sheets."

There's more regarding a certain Oil for Food programme but I am starting to get really goddamn angry so i'll leave it for you all to find and have fun with.

Before I am panned for bringing up allegations rather than convictions i'd like to offer a final thought. You are wrong about this man, I am right.


EDIT: sorry if he sues

 

[Kangy]

As long as you say "allegedly" he can't sue you even if you do say it right to his face

Allegedly, Galloway is a ****ing arse.

 

[Rupertvdb]

awesome... allegedly mr. Galloway is really a groundhog

 

[gick]

This guy is my local MP and so I feel I have ever so slightly more right than most to call him a ****ing crook scumbag. You should all join in..."****ing crook scumbag" "****ing crook scumbag"

I hear he's a bit of a shitty constituency MP too - never does surgeries, hardly ever shows up for votes in the house of commons - too busy going round doing his speaking tours (and earnining himself lots of money in the process).

 

[Solaris]

This guy is my local MP and so I feel I have ever so slightly more right than most to call him a ****ing crook scumbag. You should all join in..."****ing crook scumbag" "****ing crook scumbag"

To everyone who was impressed by what he was saying, listen to the man again, it's bullshit.

How is it? You don't agree that Isreal are the agressor?

He has political motivation for getting behind militant groups, his (and my) area happens to have a huge concentration of middle-eastern individuals and a not insignificant proportion find the tone of his rhetoric appealling. This means votes for him, more time in power, more money, influence and limelight.

He's been arguing for stuff like this long before he was ever an MP in your constituency.

This guy was investigated for manipulating a ****ing charity on trips to the middle east, make of that what you will:

Investigated, and found innocent.

There's more regarding a certain Oil for Food programme but I am starting to get really goddamn angry so i'll leave it for you all to find and have fun with.

Again, a pack of lies.

Before I am panned for bringing up allegations rather than convictions i'd like to offer a final thought. You are wrong about this man, I am right.

Nope, you just fall for all the shit thats madde up against him in the media.

 

[Rupertvdb]

I can't believe that you're impressed by him. He's a bullying, point-scoring arsehole. It's not about the media perception I have of him, it's about seeing the guy walking down the street on his political rounds and calling him an arsehole. He is one of the laziest MPs in the country preferring to talk about Hezbollah on Sky News rather than say deal with vast number of problems that Bethnal Green is currently facing.

Just because this dickhead isn't for Israel doesn't mean that he's a good guy.

In terms of my feelings about Israel's actions, i'm currently ambivalent. Their reaction has been incredibly violent, but then again theyare a nation barely larger than Wales, surrounded by hostile nations that contain several groups that wish to see the total annihalation of the Jewish state.

It has been strongly suggested that the Hezbollah organisation is being equipped by Iran. I think that this is a really bad thing. If all is to be believed , Tehran is becoming more and more aggressive and I think that their goal does seem to be the establishment of a new world order. This bothers me as I enjoy my human rights and I don't believe that any of these nations have half as much interest in such things as the West.

But then I disagree with the way that the Jewish state was brought into existence and can understand why there is so much resentment. Sadly geographical reasons for conflict are being replaced with ideological reasons (unless you consider having the entire Ottoman empire handed over geographical) and so it has come to a point where Israel needs to act. Western nations have had huge atrocities occur and we are many miles away from the terrorists supreme havens. Israel is in a lot less of a happy position and is probably the favoured target for any atrocity that the havoc makers have in mind.

All in all I am too far away from the action to really comprehend the truth of the matter, if I can achieve my goal of leaving uni and finding a job as a journo then I guess i'll get my chance and then I'll truly be able to give you an opinion on which side is in the right.


By the way Galloway was proved innocent you are right. But if you read the thing about his charity you will notice that there were never any profit or loss accounts revealed which wasn't necessary as the thing wasn't a registered charity. Why would a responsible politician who has nothing to hide creare a non-charity charity, fly to Iraq meeting with some infamous characters, come back and then say "oops, the accounts for my stay are gone, shame"

There was a connection to the Oil for Food scheme, an Iraqi businessman donated to his charity. Did I just mention that his charity had no profit and loss accounts? It is true he was not found guilty of anything, but then it was a result of ambiguities in the evidence and I don't trust a politician who will allow ambiguities to develop in their financial dealings.

I'm sure that you found Berlusconi an absolute riot.

 

[Ome_Vince]

How is it? You don't agree that Isreal are the agressor?

*kuch bullshit.
I guess Israel was the one who wondered off across the border firing rockets at civilians, killing a bunch of soldiers and kidnapping 2.

 

[Asknoone]

He truly is an asshole. Amusing to watch though.

 

[Solaris]

He truly is an asshole. Amusing to watch though.

Watch this
He Pwns the right wingers, helps the left amazingly, he's fantastic.

 

[Warbie]

Imagine getting locked up with a group of twats for 2 weeks.

Quite. He was one of the twats, though, the biggest one there (which says alot considering the company). I find it hard to take the word of someone with such obvious difficulties in judgement.

 

[Ome_Vince]

Watch this
He Pwns the right wingers, helps the left amazingly, he's fantastic.

Just watched it. Rediculous debate, both sides we're trying to destroy each others credibility with stupid arguments like:
"O yeah you were against Iraq War 1 10 years ago, you turned from a butterfly into a slug"

"O yeah, well you visited Assad, and you're no pacifist blabla"

Funny how this Galloway talks about Demagogs with cheap strongtalk, while he's the one shouting and using cheap argumentation and personal assaults.

But he was right in the sense that the current Iraq war is bs and based on a lie.

 

[Solaris]

Just watched it. Rediculous debate, both sides we're trying to destroy each others credibility with stupid arguments like:
"O yeah you were against Iraq War 1 10 years ago, you turned from a butterfly into a slug"

"O yeah, well you visited Assad, and you're no pacifist blabla"

Funny how this Galloway talks about Demagogs with cheap strongtalk, while he's the one shouting and using cheap argumentation and personal assaults.

But he was right in the sense that the current Iraq war is bs and based on a lie.

The man had just accused Galloway of stealing from charities.

 

[Ome_Vince]

No different then how he assaulted the lady in this movie with personal attacks like: "silly lady" blabla.
It doesnt make him come-off as very smart, more like a demagog.

 

[Solaris]

No different then how he assaulted the lady in this movie with personal attacks like: "silly lady" blabla.
It doesnt make him come-off as very smart, more like a demagog.

He looked fantastic imo.

 

[DaMaN]

He looked fantastic imo.

Agreed.

 

[CptStern]

noam chomsky trumps all