ahh, here we have quite a find! it seems to be...yes it is! a little bit o' environmental hating from Mr. George Bush since 2000:
oh but wait! there is more! why, what happens if an individual state tries to help out the environment? lets read on!
The new fuel-economy standards proposed by the administration in August is not attacking gas-guzzling SUV's, but that other fuel-economy concern, California(please note sarcasm). California has ordered the auto industry to cut carbon-dioxide emmissions by Thirty percent by 2016, with eight other states to follow their example. Unfortunatly, upon flipping to page 150 of Bush's proposed standards, we see that state limits on emissions are "expressly preempted.
- Percent drop in federal lawsuits for environmental violations: 75
- Percent increase in permits for oil and gas drilling on federal lands: 75
- Annual savings to industry from Bush's refusal to mandate lead-paint cleanup: $3,000,000,000(yeah, thats NINE zeros)
- Percent decline in federal fines against industrial polluters:60
- Years since number of fines has been so low: 14
- Percent decline in federal Superfund cleanups of toxic waste: 52
- Acres of untouched forests opened to developers: 58,500,000
- Endangered species that live in these areas: 220
- Species added to the endangered species list by Bush: 31
- Acres designated as wilderness by the Bush administration: 530,000
- Acres designated by Ronald Reagan: 10,600,000
oh but wait! there is more! why, what happens if an individual state tries to help out the environment? lets read on!
The new fuel-economy standards proposed by the administration in August is not attacking gas-guzzling SUV's, but that other fuel-economy concern, California(please note sarcasm). California has ordered the auto industry to cut carbon-dioxide emmissions by Thirty percent by 2016, with eight other states to follow their example. Unfortunatly, upon flipping to page 150 of Bush's proposed standards, we see that state limits on emissions are "expressly preempted.