Concealed Carry In Action And Kicking Butt!

Kebean PFC said:
That is wherre you are wrong... dead wrong (no pun). The law now is based on apperance.

Thats why he didnt say "Banning guns that look like military weapons".
 
I guess by style i dont mean looks, more the fact they can do what a military weapon can do, i.e. shoot a shit load of bullets in a small amount of time ... that kinda thing.
 
It doesnt matter if you ban weapons, criminals will still get them, and as for banning full autos, that doesnt matter either. Do you think criminals will care if there weapons are illegal? By modifieing one or two pieces on my ruger 10/22 i can make it fully automatic, then i could saw the stock off and put a folding stock on, and buy a few 50 round mags from dunhams, and did i mention how EASY it is to silence .22s?
 
That's not the point.

The average citizen has no need for a ****ing SAW, get my drift? This isn't about getting weapons out of the hands of criminals (although you'd be surprised how many weapons are obtained through theft). It's about people having the brains and responsibility to handle and properly use a weapon, let alone any necessity for one.

Of course criminals will still get weapons. They live outside of the law, duh.
 
It's about people having the brains and responsibility to handle and properly use a weapon, let alone any necessity for one.
Then thier should be a debate at all. People should be allowed to have any weapon thy want, as long as they can use it responsibly.
 
Kebean PFC said:
Then thier should be a debate at all. People should be allowed to have any weapon thy want, as long as they can use it responsibly.

No.

No they shouldn't. Certainly not any weapon, at least.

I also mentioned then necessity of weapons. Quite simply, there isn't one.
 
Back
Top