Conservapedia - Because Reality Has a Liberal Bias!

[gick]

Thought you guys might get a kick out of this..

Conservapedia is a much-needed alternative to Wikipedia, which is increasingly anti-Christian and anti-American. On Wikipedia, many of the dates are provided in the anti-Christian "C.E." instead of "A.D.", which Conservapedia uses. Christianity receives no credit for the great advances and discoveries it inspired, such as those of the Renaissance.

Wikipedia often uses foreign spelling of words, even though most English speaking users are American. Look up "Most Favored Nation" on Wikipedia and it automatically converts the spelling to the British spelling "Most Favoured Nation", even there there are far more American than British users. Look up "Division of labor" on Wikipedia and it automatically converts to the British spelling "Division of labour," then insists on the British spelling for "specialization" also.[3]. Enter "Hapsburg" (the European ruling family) and Wikipedia automatically changes the spelling to Habsburg, even though the American spelling has always been "Hapsburg". Within entries British spellings appear in the silliest of places, even when the topic is American. Conservapedia favors American spellings of words.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page

Damn those LIEBERALS!!!! :frown:

Some more highlights:

On Democrats:

The official platform of the Democratic party emphasizes strengthening America.[1] However the Democrat voting record reveals a true agenda of cowering to terrorism[2], treasonous anti-Americanism[3], and comtempt for America's founding principles such as freedom of religion[4].

On Athiests:

Viewed as a simple philosophical framework of "no god exists", atheism can provide no logical basis for any moral standard. Some atheists reject normal social conventions and live their lives according to the rule that "anything goes". Many feel this has led to a large rise in crime[1], drug use, pre-marital sex, teenage pregnancy,[2] pedophilia[3] and bestiality.

On Global Warming:

The theory is widely accepted within the scientific community despite a lack of any conclusive evidence, though that is not to say there is no evidence at all.[1][2] On February 2, 2007, an internatonal panel of hundreds of scientists and representatives of 113 governments issued a report concluding:

The observed widespread warming of the atmosphere and ocean, together with ice-mass loss, support the conclusion that it is extremely unlikely that global climate change of the past 50 years can be explained without external forcing, and very likely that is not due to known natural causes alone."[3]

It should be noted that these scientists are motivated by a need for grant money in their field of climatology. Therefore, their work can not be considered unbiased, though no more than any scientist in any other field .[4]. Also, these scientists are mostly liberal athiests, untroubled by the hubris that man can destroy the Earth which God gave him.[5]

 

[Sam]

How do the sensible Americans resist hitting these people? Or are there just so many of them that they outnumber the mentally capable?

 

[Walter]

Oh come on...atheists aren't all immoral. They just build up rules by themselves or just obey the law(second worse if you ask me, since it's an open door for mentality lack). My father is an atheist, but if not to count his lack of religious faith, he's the best father a child can have.

 

[Raziaar]

This is retarded. And I don't think it's a fair representation of your average Christian anyways. I'm sure you'll find most people would prefer wikipedia over 'conservapedia' any damn day of the week.

 

[Absinthe]

This is a joke, right?

EDIT: No... it isn't. This is ridiculous.

 

[CptStern]

Conservapedia is a much-needed alternative to Wikipedia, which is increasingly anti-Christian and anti-American.

wouldnt it be easier to just let someone kick you in the head? the effect is the same but with much less effort

 

[<RJMC>]

so wikipedia is teh evil cuz it dont hav enough praise to jesus,praise to the USA,and hav british english writting?

 

[The Monkey]

It takes forever to load, doesn't the Lord provide their servers?

 

[Stigmata]

The longer it loads, the more people defer themselves to Wikipedia anyway.

Regardless of the site's proprietors, I think we should have a bi-weekly roundup of all the non-factual things on that site, which we then petition the moderators to change. We'd destroy the site by its own means.

 

[Walter]

Also, these scientists are mostly liberal athiests, untroubled by the hubris that man can destroy the Earth which God gave him.[5]

The Germans say "don't point at another, because the other three fingers are pointing at you."

 

[brink's]

Walter, pretty much everything you say makes me laugh...You never back anything up, nor do you give genuine reason for making such (usually ridiculous)claims.

Anyway, this is pretty ridiculous, wikipedia tries to stay as objective as possible, which means they demand evidence for almost every claim they make or imform you otherwise. And, how much evidence does Christianity contain.?...that's what i thought!

Oh guys, look what they have to say about fox news!!

"Fox News was started in 1996 in response to the other cable news channels which all had obvious liberal biases. Because of this, Rupert Murdoch decided to start a real new channel which would tell the truth. The success of Fox news over every other news channel is because it is fair and balanced. [1] It has many people on it who work to spread truth such as Sean Hannity who is a great American. [2]. Fox News is best because instead of just telling you what to think, they only report the news unbiased and then allow the viewer to decide.
In 2005 the White House selected Tony Snow from Fox News to be the new White House press secretary which was a great honor for Fox because it showed how well it was presenting the real truth instead of the fake liberal version."

 

[Cole]

Guess what, only christians have faith. No other religions do! Well according to that site.


So umm, is this site affilated with Jesus Camp in any way?

 

[smwScott]

The entries for this thing read like essays for a remedial middle school English class.

I think it's great that this site exists. I couldn't possibly insult them more than they manage to unknowingly ridicule themselves.

 

[Tagaziel]

Retards are amusing

 

[The Monkey]

I loved the "debate" articles about whether the US should've entered WWI and WWII, leave the UN etc.

 

[Sulkdodds]

Oh good lord.

anti-Christian "C.E."

Stupid.

The success of Fox news over every other news channel is because it is fair and balanced. [1] It has many people on it who work to spread truth such as Sean Hannity who is a great American. [2].

Where can those citations lead...?

 

[Raziaar]

Foxpedia?

 

[Pulse]

LOL.

 

[Dax]

No no no!! This is just beyond retarded.

 

[DaMaN]

There are no words to describe how stupid this website is. (Except perhaps "Bush")

 

[Walter]

Walter, pretty much everything you say makes me laugh...You never back anything up, nor do you give genuine reason for making such (usually ridiculous)claims.

So? what exactly did i make you laugh at? Those people call scientists who say there is no global warming effect "liberal atheists" without even considering any evidence. And those are words of a so called christian representative - you should cry here.

And, how much evidence does Christianity contain.?...that's what i thought!

If you need historical evidence then there's plenty (if you don't go as far as Adam and Eve though), but i'm confused what exact evidence you need.

 

[Cole]

Yeah Bush describes it pretty well.

If you need historical evidence then there's plenty (if you don't go as far as Adam and Eve though), but i'm confused what exact evidence you need.

How about evidence for God?

 

[Walter]

what would you take as an evidence?

 

[CptStern]

a tree, yonder bubbling brook, the sky, the way a droplet of water hits a still pond


...obvious proof of god

I want a freaking lock of his hair, DNA or at the very least a polariod of god doing something superterrific ..anything else is just speculative drivel that can be explained away with simple logic


oh and Walter try to stay on topic ..i dont want this thread to derail into another thread on religion


Conservapedia, Commandments:

1. Everything you post must be true and verifiable. [LoL]
2. Always cite and give credit to your sources, even if in the public domain.
3. Edits/new pages must be family-friendly, clean, concise, and without gossip or foul language.
4. When referencing dates based on the approximate birth of Jesus, give appropriate credit for the basis of the date (B.C. or A.D.). "BCE" and "CE" are unacceptable substitutes because they deny the historical basis. See CE.
5. As much as is possible, American spelling of words must be used.[1]
6. Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry. Opinions can be posted on Talkages or on debate or discussion pages

 

[ComradeBadger]

wouldnt it be easier to just let someone kick you in the head? the effect is the same but with much less effort

He's making fun of it, not supporting it.

Personally, I think it's hilarious. Also it's quite bloody right to use the British spelling of words, we invented the language.

 

[HunterSeeker]

Its called English for a reason!

 

[Cole]

what would you take as an evidence?

Whatever you can give.


So umm, has the site gone up it's own asshole yet?

 

[CptStern]

He's making fun of it, not supporting it.

ya I know, my comments were directed at Conservapedia not gick, I like gick

 

[JNightshade]

That's incredibly funny.

 

[Krynn72]

"Hapsburg" (the European ruling family) and Wikipedia automatically changes the spelling to Habsburg, even though the American spelling has always been "Hapsburg".

oh god, thats funny. "Them damn Europeans dont know how to spell their own names!"

 

[Tagaziel]

"Many" Christians accept a lot of things, that doesn't make their position Biblical. Only God is incapable of error, and that's why this website follows God instead of the fallible beliefs of Men. You claim that this information is "factually incorrect" but you don't prove it. Besides, the founder of this website has proven, in no uncertain terms, that macroevolution (what most atheists mean when they say "evolution") is impossible. There's simply not enough time and even if there was, all mutations are harmful. The end. Ashens 14:23 22 Februrary 2007 (EST)

Somebody #### ####. ###.

On second thought, somebody mail Mechagodzilla to them. Now.

 

[staticprimer]

Is this what brain damage feels like? Please add a warning in all caps, for the sake of everyone's mental health!

 

[Jintor]

Incredibly stupid.

 

[Stigmata]

Either this site has literally made me stupider, or this kind of stupidity is just incomprehensible to intelligent people.

I hope I'm not the only one who can't understand how anyone would think like this, because if I am, it means they have won D:

 

[sinkoman]

****.

You need to have a webmaster verified account to access the edit feature.

Was gonna change "conservative" to read: "whiny Christian douchebag that bitches about everything and won't let go of gods' testicals".

 

[brink's]

He's making fun of it, not supporting it.

Personally, I think it's hilarious. Also it's quite bloody right to use the British spelling of words, we invented the language.

LOLZ, oh, ya...weal we perphekted it joo noob!!!!

 

[Atomic_Piggy]

What. The. ****

Frikken' ridiculous: http://www.conservapedia.com/Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia

 

[gick]

ya I know, my comments were directed at Conservapedia not gick, I like gick

:naughty:

Its got to the point where theres so much vandalism on the site you can't tell which articles are ironic humour and which ones are genuine stupidity.

 

[Nemesis6]

Damn those crazy Rethuglicans ruining a perfectly good wikipedia. They always vandalize what they don't agree with.

But my vote is that those aren't Rethuglican vandals. It's more the likes of you than anyone else. So, tell me, do you think Muslimwikipedia.com is pathetic, too?

 

[Raziaar]

there's a muslim wikipedia too? WTF is wrong with wikipedia?