CptStern
suckmonkey
- Joined
- May 5, 2004
- Messages
- 10,303
- Reaction score
- 62
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Wow at handling a girl like that, hope he said goodbye to his badger and hello to an assault charge.
And you're just a ****ing moron. Thinking a girl can't handle that treatment is an insult to women you sexist little shit.Wow at handling a girl like that, hope he said goodbye to his badger and hello to an assault charge.
Is there an ordinance against skateboarding? Okay, then they shouldn't be skateboarding. The police have every right to tell them that, and if they don't listen, they should prepare to have force used on them.
Oh, wait, that sounds like I'm supporting the gubmint!
ZOMG POLICE ARE BAAAAD
And you're just a ****ing moron. Thinking a girl can't handle that treatment is an insult to women you sexist little shit.
Cop had no reason to arrest them, but it was pretty stupid of them to run away from a police officer.
Exactly.Once the kid ran, the officer had all the suspicion necessary to make an arrest.
Not being sexist != ignoring the difference between a man and a woman.And you're just a ****ing moron. Thinking a girl can't handle that treatment is an insult to women you sexist little shit.
Lol typos. There was no force beyond what was necessary to arrest these shits. He was forced to restrain them so he did. Give me an example of brutality please.The cop should have been suspended without pay for use of necessary force.
Oh, so just because a person has a vagina makes them unable to cope with a headlock? I know plenty of tough women, in fact many of the women I know are more resilient than most men I know. Some of my least favorite people to fight in karate are women. Why? Because they're crazy bitches and tough. They're the ones that will push themselves that extra mile when all the guys are giving up. If you're going to act tough and resist a police officer, he's going to treat you the same way he'll treat anyone else, regardless of body parts.Not being sexist != ignoring the difference between a man and a woman.
It's not being sexist to think assaulting a woman is worse than assaulting a man.
So what, he's just going to run after the motorcycle? Yeah smart idea.
You think they "just stopped", yet he exploded anyway? I highly doubt it. Of course we only see video after the cop "explodes", we have no idea what went on before that instant.
The only person that cooperated was the cameraman, everyone else resisted when he tried to grab them, you saw the one that ran. Not resisting = letting him arrest you, which is what you do in that situation. There was no "brutality" to be seen, he did not strike them or beat them, he restrained them, which is what you're supposed to do.
But I forgot, cops can't do anything right, so yeah, down with the gubmint.
If you're going to act tough and resist a police officer, he's going to treat you the same way he'll treat anyone else, regardless of body parts.
Do you realise you are being your own definition of a sexist in this paragraph?Oh, so just because a person has a vagina makes them unable to cope with a headlock? I know plenty of tough women, in fact many of the women I know are more resilient than most men I know. Some of my least favorite people to fight in karate are women. Why? Because they're crazy bitches and tough. They're the ones that will push themselves that extra mile when all the guys are giving up. If you're going to act tough and resist a police officer, he's going to treat you the same way he'll treat anyone else, regardless of body parts.
Do you realise you are being your own definition of a sexist in this paragraph?
Which is why your extreme definition fails.
She ran from him, he grabbed her. The other kid charged him, he grabbed him to. She resisted and was released. Or did you miss that part.He put two people who didn't resist, AT ALL, into a chokehold. He grabbed the girl, she backed off a bit, and then he put her into a headlock, and when somebody went "WHAT THE **** ARE YOU DOING?" he grabbed them and put them in a headlock too.
There's semi-justification on choking the girl, although i'd say barely any, but why the hell did he choke out some kid telling him to stop? Is talking considered "interfering"?
Did I say they were tougher than guys because they were women? No, I did not. Just as there are women that are weak and fragile, there are also guys that are weak and fragile, and there are women that are strong, and men that are strong. Treat them the same goddamn way or you're no better than the morons that prevented them for voting and tried to keep them in the kitchen.Do you realise you are being your own definition of a sexist in this paragraph?
Which is why your extreme definition fails.
I love how women want to fight on the front lines in the military but as soon one gets put in a headlock it's all "women are weaker they can't handle that!"Women want equal rights, but only those rights that are beneficial to them. This is not one of them.
Did you not see what happened? He says something to the girl and she runs. Christ, she's lucky he didn't tackle her.Hell, that white girl didn't even resist at ALL, yet he kept saying "she resisted arrest". She was standing there, watching, when he turned around and grabbed her by the throat.
all you have to do is say "look guys, do me a favor and go somewhere else and skateboard"...if they start being assholes about it then fine, get in their face....but i dont see how choking them was justifiable...
Stern, watch the scene again. That wasn't a chokehold, he basically put his arm around her neck to restrain her. It's a basic maneuver that can cause no harm to the person it's performed on. Remember, he let her go. Does no one notice that?you're overreacting MiccyNarc and completely off base ..comparing women fighting on the front lines and a girl in a headlock is rediculous ..first of all potential women on the front lines are soldiers: trained and disciplined ..the girl in question probably weighed no more than 110 pounds ..fatty mcCop easily weighed twice that. To say she was a danger to the cop because women are capable of fighting in war is ludicrous ..should women be discounted a a threat because they're women? certainly not ..however each situation should be weighed individually regardless of gender: that's part of their training. He unreasonably escalated the situation and lost control ..that much is evident from the video and the fact he was suspended
No one got ****ing choked. A choke lock is completely different than what you see there, involves both arms locked on the person's neck, crushing the windpipe. Headlocks (what you saw there) are painless. Annoying and uncomfortable, but not dangerous whatsoever.but i dont see how choking them was justifiable...
No one got ****ing choked. A choke lock is completely different than what you see there, involves both arms locked on the person's neck, crushing the windpipe.
you get about 25% shithead cops like that one, 25% nice/cool cops, and 50% apathetic ones that are tired of their job so they're not particularly nice or mean, just routine about stuff.