Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
spanking is detrimental regardless of severity
Detrimental to what? Not having a sore butt? I'd like to see where you're getting this information from.
The evidence to date supports a conditional sequence model of optimal disciplinary tactics.13 For 2- to 6-year-olds, parents should establish a solid foundation of a positive, loving parent-child relationship. They should emphasize proactive teaching – an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. When misbehavior occurs, they need effective responses, beginning with verbal correction and reasoning. Disciplinary reasoning becomes more effective by itself when backed up periodically with nonphysical punishment. When a 2- to 6-year-old refuses to cooperate with nonphysical punishment, such as time out, it needs to be enforced with something like a two-swat spank to the buttocks. Yes, there are alternatives that work better for a few children all of the time and for all children some of the time. But when spanking is used in this way at these ages, the evidence to date indicates it is effective, especially in getting children to cooperate more with the milder disciplinary tactics. In this way, parents can reduce the need to use spanking at all as the child gets older. Parents need more disciplinary options, not fewer ones. They also need to know optimal strategies for all aspects of discipline. Hopefully future research can build on these two reviews to provide parents with that information.
Look, I can do that too:
http://www.dadi.org/usn_spnk.htm
http://faculty.biola.edu/paulp/
http://www.corpun.com/benatar.htm
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?&artid=1118118
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2001/08/24_spank.html
There's a big difference between spanking and flat out child abuse. My view is that moderate spanking should be used in situations where a child would not otherwise listen. It's more or less parental experimentation with what works and what doesn't. If my children turn out to be well behaved to the point where spanking wouldn't be justified, then I probably wouldn't see a need for it. On the other hand, if my children were to sometimes behave in a way where spanking may be a good solution, I'm certainly not against giving them a smack on the butt and going from there.
By the way Stern, one of your links is actually in support of spanking:
http://faculty.biola.edu/paulp/Larzelere02.html
In contrast, Gershoff (2002) concluded, ?Ten of the 11 meta-analyses indicate parental corporal punishment is associated with . . . undesirable behaviors and experiences.
sedako said:My view is that moderate spanking should be used in situations where a child would not otherwise listen.
Dad and Mom are no fools: They know their '90s parenting manuals. So when 4-year-old Jason screams, "No!" and darts under the dining room table when it's time to leave Grandma's, Dad patiently crouches down. "Remember, Jason," he says soothingly, "when we talked earlier about leaving?" Jason, scowling, doesn't budge. His mother shifts uneasily and riffles through her mental Rolodex of tips garnered from all those child-rearing books. She offers Jason choices ("Would you like to come out by yourself, or shall I get you?"), then rewards ("I've got a cookie for you to eat in the car"), and finally consequences ("Get out or no Arthur tomorrow!"). Jason retreats further and cries, "I don't want to!" His parents look at each other wearily. Jason is a bright, cheerful child who, like most spirited kids, is gifted at pushing limits. He is often well-behaved, but lately, when his parents ask him to do something, he seems to melt down entirely, screaming and even biting. Now he sticks out his tongue and announces, "I hate you!" His father hauls the tiny tyrant, kicking and flailing, out from under the table. Jason lets loose an earsplitting yell. Dad, red-faced, finally loses it, raising his hand over his son's rear end.
you dont discipline babies, they dont uinderstand
The logic going on here seems to be "but I was beat when I was a kid, I have the right to give my kids the same treatment!".
Thats what they want you to think. They know damn well what they're doing!
Corporal punishment is absolutely neccessary imo. If father(s) calmly explains why they are about to get whupped before doing so, you can make the child to understand what he/she did wrong. Parents should not spank their child when they are angry. Hard as it is, but the child cannot learn any worldy lessons from the blind anger of senseless beating(s).
Plus, the life lesson to be learned is that the world will not take so kindly to foul, rotten behavior, and the lesson the father teaches them is that for every bad action, there's an equally painful opposite reaction. Better the child gets spanked than waiting for him/her to grow up only to get thrown in the slammer, or worse. Corporal punishment is actually an act of mercy compared to what they will face in the real world when they grow up if they don't learn proper behavior.
OR, like I've read somewhere else before, (can't find the link now) , there was one father that made his children spank him when they've done something that many would spank their child for. This father in particular found his three children (two daughters and a son) fighting on day after coming home from work. The father taught them the lesson that for failing to raise them properly, he fails as a father and has failed them, then proceeds to remove his belt and made all three of them lash him him times each. The children cried profusely, as if this was an even more harsh punishment to beat their own father. His children now are renowned doctors and professors.
Yes, but not every parent has a degree in psychology and knows the mental psycho-babble for everyoh come on ..first of all there's plenty of people here who have said they werent hit bytheir parents and are not "in the slammer" and conversely there's plenty of people here who were and are not proffesors or doctors
suffice it to say you cant really say you'd do this or that until you're actuially faced with it
Yes, but not every parent has a degree in psychology and knows the mental psycho-babble for every
scenario and condition, and yes, I personally don't care to learn.
I don't have any children, but I've basically been raising my nephew the past couple of years, and yes the saying that goes, "you don't know how you would react until you have kids of your own" definately holds true.
Parents are indeed obligated to discipline their children the way they see fit, and the way they best know how.
Stern, if you can raise your kids up proper without corporal punishment, then more power to ya. Whether it be corporal punishment or not is not what matters as long they get the point across imo. "The world is a cruel place and will not tolerate foul behavior," is the ultimate lesson.
At the end of the day Stern, people have a right to do things their own way.
There is no evidence to suggest that spanking is harmful, so there is no reason it should be illegal.
If you can make do without it, great - but it's your own personal opinion and noone else should be beholden to it.
no they dont, if that were true we wouldnt prosecute parents who physically abuse their children ..you're assuming ownership of your children therefore they are less than human because they have zero rights
yes there is, I've posted it ..there is no evidence that light spanking in an infrequent basis leads to new or unique phsycological damage but that doesnt take into account problems that may manifest themselves after decades
no it's not my personal opinion, it's one shared by educators, medical professionals, child psychologists etc
I find it funny that in this day and age that young people still think the only solution is a violent one
Spanking is not physical abuse.
And others have posted evidence that contradicts yours.
Spanking isn't violent.
Nor did I say anything about it being the only solution.
As has quite rightly been pointed out, if kids grow up in a world that's all sweetness and light, what the hell hope do they have of surviving in the real world?
It's a real problem when these sheltered kids turn 18 and suddenly they get the shock of finding out that the world is actually a piece of shit, and they're totally unequipped to deal with it.
I'm sorry, but not heeding the words of some quack psychologist does not automatically make someone a bad parent. No offense or anything Stern. I've heard you worked in that field before and all.sorry but you already failed as a parent ..it is in your children's best interests that you learn the proper way of parenting
I'm sorry, but not heeding the words of some quack psychologist does not automatically make someone a bad parent. No offense or anything Stern. I've heard you worked in that field before and all.
I just don't believe in psycho-analyzing everything. It's one step from witch-doctoring imo.
Keep it simple. There's no shades of grey and what's wrong is wrong.
there is always shades of grey ..what will you do when your two year old pees on the dog? or purposefully spills his milk? it's the paddle for them?
and yes I worked in the field ..as an art teacher ..no psycho babble for me, my education was all on the creative side