Creationists harrass Museums over Evolution exhibits

[Absinthe]

I don't understand that kind of hypocrisy either.

First they'll say that science doesn't pertain to God, but then they'll try to prove his existence through (skewed) science any way. And when that doesn't work, they're back to square one.

 

[ríomhaire]

"Animals have diversified into many varieties in the last 4400 years since the Flood."
Do you smell that? It smells like EVOLUTION!

 

[Ikerous]

"Animals have diversified into many varieties in the last 4400 years since the Flood."
Do you smell that? It smells like EVOLUTION!

Well yea.. thats cuz creationists believe in evolution..

 

[Absinthe]

No, not all creationists.

 

[Ikerous]

No, not all creationists.

I've never heard a single creationist argue against mirco-evolution.. no one

::Googles it for a while to see::

 

[CptStern]

Well yea.. thats cuz creationists believe in evolution..

no they try to hammer pieces to fit their puzzle ..there's no science behind what they believe ..oh and I truely believe that as a layman I can give a phd in creationism a smackdown ..there's nothing in their bag of tricks that couldnt easily be dismissed

 

[Ikerous]

no they try to hammer pieces to fit their puzzle ..there's no science behind what they believe

They believe the same exact thing scientists do about macro evolution.. thats science right there
They just don't believe in macro evolution

oh and I truely believe that I as a layman can give a phd in creationism a smackdown

I'm sure you could, but you know a whole hell of a lot more about science than the average person

 

[OCybrManO]

They believe the same exact thing scientists do about macro [I'm assuming you mean "micro" here) evolution.. thats science right there
They just don't believe in macro evolution

So, they believe that gene mutations (well, profitable ones) actually occur but only on certain predefined genes that wouldn't take them out of the arbitrary classification (invented by humans) of the various "types" of animals? Define the fundamental difference between "micro evolution" and "macro evolution" because, as far as I know, they're the same process... just viewed on different scales. Explain how it can't change an animal from, let's say, a chimp to a human... and yet it can manage to change enough from the small selection of animals that could fit on the ark to the entire variety of animals on Earth. Genetic mutations are practically random... producing major differences like extra digits/limbs, fur-like hair covering the entire body, 3 feet tall people, babies born with a brain lacking everything but a the stem, and all kinds of weird shit. Yet, they don't think evolution could give ape-like creatures more advanced brains, less hair, and a slightly different bone structure? What limitations are there in "micro evolution" that prevent this?

 

[ríomhaire]

no they try to hammer pieces to fit their puzzle ..there's no science behind what they believe

They believe the same exact thing scientists do about macro evolution.. thats science right there

More like scientists look at the pieces already there and use them to work out the remaining ones while creationists have pre-set beliefs that they cut to fit around the pieces already there.