http://img1.uploadimages.net/860026ugly.jpg
Just an example.
It's laughable how shit these maps look. The engine is capable of more.
Just an example.
It's laughable how shit these maps look. The engine is capable of more.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
maybe u should enable some AA. What gfx do u have?Cheta said:http://img1.uploadimages.net/860026ugly.jpg
Just an example.
It's laughable how shit these maps look. The engine is capable of more.
Cheta said:http://img1.uploadimages.net/860026ugly.jpg
Just an example.
It's laughable how shit these maps look. The engine is capable of more.
Gavon said:maybe u should enable some AA. What gfx do u have?
To be honest all i see in that pic is lack of gfx settings enabled. This isn't farcry ppl its an online gameCheta said:faults pointed out in the image have nothing to do with your graphics card
Cheata i do see wut ur saying about the lack of grass. Really isn't that big of deal to me, wut bothers me is no diff models!Cheta said:You dont see the blocky brushes? The poorly done displacement? The lack of displacement on the grass? The bland hill texture?
:frog:
Gavon said:Cheata i do see wut ur saying about the lack of grass. Really isn't that big of deal to me, wut bothers me is no diff models!
Cheta said:http://img1.uploadimages.net/860026ugly.jpg
Just an example.
It's laughable how shit these maps look. The engine is capable of more.
Shuzer said:I'm going to have to agree, from the screens I've seen, CS:S looks awful.
Yep, just saw those office shots, those looked nice.
Jackal hit said:wow okay, what is cs:s ugly compared to? it's cs, not unreal 3.0. for something that's gotta have lots of players AND physics and still be playable with low lag... maps don't look half bad... i think they're hot actually. someone needs to make a bink or something. maps are hot hot hot.
Jackal hit said:wow okay, what is cs:s ugly compared to? it's cs, not unreal 3.0. for something that's gotta have lots of players AND physics and still be playable with low lag... maps don't look half bad... i think they're hot actually. someone needs to make a bink or something. maps are hot hot hot.
skumbuzzul said:Turn up your resolution genius.
wbcheater said:turn jpegquality to 100%
Ecthe|ioN said:Most of the maps look rushed IMO, but we might see a bunch of updates in the near future.. I'm happy as long as I'm able to play more maps
Fletch said:Since when has CS been about the graphics?? I always brought it up in the "do graphics matter that much" arguments with my mates.
It soon shut them up. Sure they're not the best, but they're functional at the least, and in my opinion they're pretty decent. Stop winging and enjoy the damn game
blahblahblah said:I don't understand why you would be happy that you have to wait for an update to get the quality you thought you were supposed to get?
This is one of the reasons why I am not giving my money to valve just yet.
counterstrike isn't about the graphics. counterstrike: source is. those somewhat half-assed maps are disappointing, especially considering how good dust/office/aztek look.Fletch said:Since when has CS been about the graphics??
Shuzer said:/me hugs his retail preorder
Cheta said:I'm actually starting to belive this is the best the engine is capable of.