Daily show watchers have 4 more years of school than "The O'Reilly Factor"

PC Wars are not succesful and are costly on allied lives. It's an effective and deserved response.
 
Foxtrot said:
I little drastic, but he makes a good point.
Click to expand...


How does he make a good point at all?

If the government didn't hand over the taliban we should have made the civilian population starve? Of course we just ignore the many many people who have no way to resist the government and all the children who's only fault lay in that they were born there. Might as well just let them starve too.

I don't think that's a good point. I think it's sick.
 
I love O reily

He pisses so many democrats and liberals off its too funny. And all the hate mail he gets is one of the reasons I watch.


And not everyday he saids I agree with but somethings I do.
 
Neutrino said:
How does he make a good point at all?

If the government didn't hand over the taliban we should have made the civilian population starve?

I don't think that's a good point. I think it's sick.
Click to expand...
I agree, it is sick. But he did make a good point that they brought that unto themselves.
 
CptStern said:
ya and that's been proven highly successful in say ...iraq
Click to expand...
That wasn't used nearly at all in Iraq.

And it was only half way used in Afghanistan.
 
Foxtrot said:
I agree, it is sick. But he did make a good point that they brought that unto themselves.
Click to expand...



Yeah it is kinda sick to say that. The guy is moronic at times but sometimes reasonable on what he saids. But that sure wasn't one of them reasonable statements he has said at times.
 
Foxtrot said:
I agree, it is sick. But he did make a good point that they brought that unto themselves.
Click to expand...

Ok that's good. :)

But how exactly did the current population bring it on themselves? Did you or I have a hand in setting up our current government?

And O'Reilly says it himself that it's a very primitive country. It wasn't a democracy either. So how exactly were people suppose to just overthrow their government?
 
Noone is quotting me maybe I should say something offensive nah can't do that no more. Maybe I piss them off in other means.

Nah **** I hate attention but I just already posted this and don't know how to earse.
 
Neutrino said:
Ok that's good. :)

But how exactly did the current population bring it on themselves? Did you or I have a hand in setting up our current government?

And O'Reilly says it himself that it's a very primitive country. It wasn't a democracy either. So how exactly were people suppose to just overthrow their government?
Click to expand...
Well if we had lived in the 1770s or 80s I think we would have had a hand in setting up our government(that is if you live in the US). Honestly though I don't know much about Afghanistan except the war with Russian they had, and all the weapons they had...which could be assumed that they still have some, with which they could overthrow their government like the northern alliance or whatever they are called. When my Dad went to Afghanistan in the 70s he bought a rifle on the street for real cheap(less than $5 I think) and a sword...
 
If the government becomes corrupted to the point of the Talivan (To a point of black and white- you see it is clearly, there is not a question. Gray areas are bad but not to this point) you have a responsibility to rebel and crush it. Perfect example: Northern Alliance. You shouldn't be sitting and being apathetic to the whole thing.
 
Foxtrot said:
Well if we had lived in the 1770s or 80s I think we would have had a hand in setting up our government(that is if you live in the US). Honestly though I don't know much about Afghanistan except the war with Russian they had, and all the weapons they had...which could be assumed that they still have some, with which they could overthrow their government like the northern alliance or whatever they are called. When my Dad went to Afghanistan in the 70s he bought a rifle on the street for real cheap(less than $5 I think) and a sword...
Click to expand...

Alright, I'll try to put it a different way. I'll admit some people could probably have tried to do something about it. Perhaps it could be argued that, yes, they had a responsibility to do so. However, there are many other people with no means to fight back. Women and children being the obvious examples. So to hold the entire population accountable for the governments action is not right I don't think. Maybe that explains what I mean a bit better.
 
Neutrino said:
Alright, I'll try to put it a different way. I'll admit some people could probably have tried to do something about it. Perhaps it could be argued that, yes, they had a responsibility to do so. However, there are many other people with no means to fight back. Women and children being the obvious examples. So to hold the entire population accountable for the governments action is not right I don't think. Maybe that explains what I mean a bit better.
Click to expand...
I wasn't aware that women could not fight.

Children go with the parents.
 
the daily show is a good program. i watch it much more than o'rielly. in fact, i rarely watch o'reilly. i prefer hannity, or scarborough.

by the way, one of the reasons o'reillys show isnt on in so many countries is that fox isnt syndicated, which i believe comedy central is.
 
O'Reilly is nothing more than a TV shock jock. He makes outrageous, often flat out wrong claims to support his arguments. He doesn't debate, he berates. I don't understand why anyone of any stature at all would want to go on that show. As a matter of fact the way he gets guests is usually by calling them pussies, which if I remember correctly was what I did in kindergarten. For gods sake, I know republicans that are embarrassed to have him as a spokesman. Anyone who watches that show in an attempt to gain factual information is an ignorant fool.

As far as Stewart, I enjoy his show a lot. He is very funny, which is the purpose of his show. It's not a news show, and if you watch the Daily Show for news then you are quite possibly just as ignorant as the people who do the same for O'Reilly. It's just pure comedy, which mostly focuses on political issues.

PS. The boyscouts should all die.
 
RakuraiTenjin said:
I wasn't aware that women could not fight.

Children go with the parents.
Click to expand...

Of course women are capable of fighting. But we're talking women in Afghanistan. Somehow I think it might be just a tad more difficult for them than the men.

http://www.amnesty.org/ailib/intcam/afgan/afgtoc.htm
http://www.afghan-web.com/woman/
http://www.rawa.org/women.html
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/asia/july-dec01/afghanwomen_11-21.html

Children go with the parents? What's that suppose to mean?
 
smwScott said:
O'Reilly is nothing more than a TV shock jock. He makes outrageous, often flat out wrong claims to support his arguments. He doesn't debate, he berates. I don't understand why anyone of any stature at all would want to go on that show. As a matter of fact the way he gets guests is usually by calling them pussies, which if I remember correctly was what I did in kindergarten. For gods sake, I know republicans that are embarrassed to have him as a spokesman. Anyone who watches that show in an attempt to gain factual information is an ignorant fool.

As far as Stewart, I enjoy his show a lot. He is very funny, which is the purpose of his show. It's not a news show, and if you watch the Daily Show for news then you are quite possibly just as ignorant as the people who do the same for O'Reilly. It's just pure comedy, which mostly focuses on political issues.

PS. The boyscouts should all die.
Click to expand...

Dude!!!! You had a syndicated opinion program in kindergarden? :)
O'reilly is a douche, stewart is funny.. Pretty clear who has the better show I say.
 
Shadowlands5325 said:
I love O reily

He pisses so many democrats and liberals off its too funny. And all the hate mail he gets is one of the reasons I watch.


And not everyday he saids I agree with but somethings I do.
Click to expand...

Agreed..pissed off liberals are hilarious.
 
KidRock said:
Agreed..pissed off liberals are hilarious.
Click to expand...
Well, start laughing, 'cause we're everywhere. :devil:

And, from experience, I can tell you that boy scouts deserve everything they get.
 
I find it hilarious that the O'Reilly supporters in these forums are proud they can piss people off.

We of the side of Mr. Stewart actually make points. You guys just rant.
 
smwScott said:
He doesn't debate, he berates.
Click to expand...
Oh yeah? Well, I'm a master berater! I'll demonstra-

*OCybrManO gets arrested for trying to expose himself in public.

Hey! That's not what I said! This is just a terrible misunderstanding...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Gorgon
ATI VP Show
Replies
1
Views
767
The Dark Elf
The Dark Elf
Back
Top