Did We Land On The Moon? -Discussion-

kaf11 said:
We landed on the moon. Mars is next, bitches.
Click to expand...
True then some one will say that we did not land on the moon or mars! :eek:
 
my biggest questiong about this is

is there is a video of the spacecraft launching from the moon,who take that video?
I remenber there was a video of the landed vehicle thing that hav launched and it was take by a camera at a distance so who take that video?
 
Dam, documentary says there's no telescope strong enough to view the moons surface in detail :p. So i think the first thing to do, is invent an uber-telescope so we can see if the American flag is on the moon :p
That should put an end to it :)
 
<RJMC> said:
my biggest questiong about this is

is there is a video of the spacecraft launching from the moon,who take that video?
I remenber there was a video of the landed vehicle thing that hav launched and it was take by a camera at a distance so who take that video?
Click to expand...
I believe that wasn't a tape of the original moon landing, rather one of the later ones. And that would obviously have been taken by a remote camera that they just set up before they left on a tripod or something similar.

Interesting fact: Its likely that if you brought batteries with you, and replaced them, you could get the moon rover working again assuming you can find it.
 
anyway I believe it was true,cuz in the videos the sand dont move like the sand here
 
They didn't land on the moon. They merely created a second moon and launched it into orbit with people on it, who shot the footage then came back.

Duh.
 
OF COURSE 9/11 was faked! IT WAS A MISSLE SENT BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT TO SILENCE WISTLE BLOWERS BEFORE THEY TOLD THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT'S PLOT TO FAKE 9/11!
 
Of course we landed. One of the reasons I bet the government doesn't bother to lend a helping hand is because 90% of the population DOES believe it already. Not to mention if I were in the US government I'd leave the speculation up to the people because I wouldn't mind people thinking I had enough clout and power to fake something as big as a moon landing.
 
The American government cannot even keep its secret airbases secret. You honestly believe they could fake the moon landing and keep it quiet? We placed reflectors on the moon during one of the Apollo missions in order to measure the moons orbit, which is pretty good proof given how sciencetists around the world can use them and have used them.
 
I indulged this thought for a day or two and decided to do some research. My conclusion: we landed. :)
 
Yeah, I saw something on TV that debunked all of the conspiracy theories. Not that they were "bunked" to beging with, though.
 
AW HAYLE NAW! They merely set up a studio and recorded it, and broadcasted it on national tv from within the deepest bowels of Area - 51. God I have to stop playing that ****ing game now......
 
.... and no matter what anyone says in the future, a welsh scientist developed the practical method for warpdrive.
 
clarky003 said:
.... and no matter what anyone says in the future, a welsh scientist developed the practical method for warpdrive.
Click to expand...
inevitable?

yes.
 
JNightshade said:
Yes. We did. Conspiracy theorists are all freaking nutjobs.
Click to expand...

Agreed. qft.

If it was faked then why didn't the international community claim hoax when they got to examine the moon rocks?
 
Did We? No... did I? Hell yes.
 
Raziaar said:
Did We? No... did I? Hell yes.
Click to expand...

Woman voice: The cow jumped over the moon.
Child voice: Whats the moon?
WV: The moon is a natural sattelite that blahblahblahblah


If you know, you know. :E
 
ISSUE 6 - How could NASA take TV images of the LM ascending on Apollo 15, 16, and 17 if there was no one on the Lunar surface to man the camera?

fake13.jpg


Now, most of these charges are pretty dumb, but this one really has to take the cake. As you can see from the collection of images above (from two different missions) on the later Apollo missions (15-17) the astronauts left the TV camera pointed at the LM so that viewers on Earth could watch the liftoff. Initially, the camera was unable to track the ascent stage as it rose into space, but by Apollo 17, NASA had figured a way to get the camera to track upward and follow the spacecraft. So the answer to this one is also simple and obvious -- the camera was remotely controlled from Earth.
Click to expand...


How do you explain that? Also on the flight to the moon they had a colored camera. Why would they film the moon walk with an old black and white camera? ^_^


and don't get me started on the "C" rock:


c-rock6.jpg



http://www.lunaranomalies.com/c-rock.htm


:LOL: :LOL: :LOL:
 
Fishlore said:
LOL. Putting aside all of the incredibly poor science that the conspiracy theorists cling to, let's look at something else. Russia. The many moon landings happened during the height of the cold war. If there was any nation in the world that would be able to watch our rockets go to the moon it was Russia. Wouldn't our biggest, baddest, meanest enemy of the time be quick to point out lies and deceit? They would have told every soul on the planet that the US is lying about going to the moon and used science to disprove the US claims had this been the truth.
Click to expand...
You owned them. That's basically the argument I use the most :)

Darth Sidious said:
Yes we landed on the moon. In my mind there is no second thoughts... That would be a BIG STUNT for the Goverment and NASA to pull off just to fake a lot of people. So yes they did.
Click to expand...
Although you can't disbelieve a conspiracy theory just because it's so big it's implausible - MKULTRA is proof of that.

Sam-2k said:
They didn't land on the moon. They merely created a second moon and launched it into orbit with people on it, who shot the footage then came back.

Duh.
Click to expand...
Heh, nice.

TheAmazingRando said:
The American government cannot even keep its secret airbases secret. You honestly believe they could fake the moon landing and keep it quiet? We placed reflectors on the moon during one of the Apollo missions in order to measure the moons orbit, which is pretty good proof given how sciencetists around the world can use them and have used them.
Click to expand...
Sauce?

My view: So not faked.
 
That link is EXCELLENT in debunking the C hoax theory! Lots of facts :)

Good read... take that you non believers.


We landed on the friggen moon.
 
All conspiracy theories are invented by the government to distract us from the truth.
 
ZoFrex my source for that info was the Discovery Science channel. I believe it was on the show about moon formation.
 
not exactly convincing, but it is intresting to watch, and have doubts pop up here and there. Indeed i think they got some kind of proof, but there is no way of telling which side is true or not for years.
 
Late fall 2008 is when the Lunar Imaging Orbiter launches. It'll take pictures of the whole moon including the landing sites. And since when do astronauts, pictures, videotape, and actual physical rocks not count as proof?
 
Direwolf said:
And since when do astronauts, pictures, videotape, and actual physical rocks not count as proof?
Click to expand...
When one is paranoid and ignorant.

Face it the Soviet Union would of exposed the USA in no time if it was faked.
 
Direwolf said:
Late fall 2008 is when the Lunar Imaging Orbiter launches. It'll take pictures of the whole moon including the landing sites. And since when do astronauts, pictures, videotape, and actual physical rocks not count as proof?
Click to expand...
That's the problem with conspiracy theories where people are hell bent to prove them.

"The photos are fakes"
"The rocks are from earth and all the scientists are kept quiet by government"
"The videos were filmed in the desert"

There's no end to it because if any "proof" arrives it is just debunked as being purposely put there by the government.

The only way they'd be happy is to get them in a lander and throw them out on the moon (with or without suit depending how annoying they are)
 
Yep of course we went.

As for taking pictures of the landing sites with Hubble, I don't think the telescope has the resolution needed to do that. Hubble is an excellent piece of equipment because its out of the earth's atmosphere, and can produce clearer images. I think people over-estimate how powerful it actually is. The amount of magnification needed to resolve something so far away would be utterly astonishing.

To me, the surest sign that nothing was faked is the interaction between the feet of the astronaughts and the dust on the surface. It demonstrates that they're in a total vacuum, under low-gravity conditions.

The rest of the rubbish about stars, shadows, the engine on the lander, its all laughable. Even the crank on the video talking about dust falling on the feet of the lander - hes utterly utterly brainless not to figure out that little issue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

MFL
Fascinating look at the ongoing psychological evolution of flat hieirarchies.
Replies
2
Views
2K
Tollbooth Willie
Tollbooth Willie
B
Community Interviews: Tony Newton, co-creator of Redemption
Replies
0
Views
5K
Barnz
B
-smash-
Roundtable Session with the Writers from Valve
Replies
5
Views
1K
ríomhaire
ríomhaire
RakuraiTenjin
102 MINUTES THAT CHANGED THE WORLD
Replies
26
Views
2K
kineaesth
kineaesth
Hectic Glenn
Chet on CS:GO Interview Part 1 - We won't change the rules of CS
Replies
17
Views
5K
DEATHMASTER
DEATHMASTER
Back
Top