KagePrototype
Tank
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
- Messages
- 6,356
- Reaction score
- 1
Rupertvdb said:those eyebrows make me think you are up to something.... something bad..... real bad.
/me looks at Repurtvdb's avatar
Speak for yourself mate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Rupertvdb said:those eyebrows make me think you are up to something.... something bad..... real bad.
acme420 said:well with all the hype that been said over halflife2 do you think it could suck when it comes out and we got all hyped up for nothing?
Rupertvdb said:I am not worried about HL2 sucking, it is too unlikely for words because of the quality of the team working on it and the effort that has been placed into this thing.
Shuzer said:I dispute the physics claims!
I also want to say FC can't even TOUCH HL2's physics.. most people with the "naughty" experience of HL2's physics would agree, I'd say
Alig said:I think everyone here is too ignorant ...HL2 can and might suck. You see my expectations are normal and most peoples expectations are so stupidly high that they will be in for a shock because HL2 will NOT revolutionize or have anything new to what we actually have now. It has'nt got the best graphics. It hasnt got better physics than ive already seen. It has a top secret story that will be good i know but so does doom3....the only thing HL2 has that no one has tried yet is realistic facial expressions...i mean seriously, that is the only new thing about it and it wont make the game amazingly better while everyone was slating FEAR for not having anything new.
When people say "not a chance in hell" and "You can have fun with just the engine" makes me think because farcry has as good physics as HL2 looks to have.
I hope the game wont be a disaster...while the devs say its better than HL1, of course they will...they have'nt worked 5 years for something to say its predecessor could still be better because HL1 was amazing.
Anyway, i think HL2 has as much chance of being crap as any sequel is and usually IS.
Alig said:I dont because im not basing my opinions on someone that plays stolen software that cant REALLY like the HL series so much if you want to play the stolen version of it that valve spent 5 years making
MACHINE said:Dont think Ive ever disagreed with anyone on these forums more so than you right now!
Shuzer said:I hope that was sarcastic.. I can't tell. I'm about as big a HL fan as you'll find.
BTW, I own FC. And it was on the top of my "want list," above HL2 before it came out.
Alig said:Nah that was'nt sarcastic. The way you put it accross to me is you've got and played the stolen version of HL2 which imo is sad and shows your unloyal to Valve for ever downloading it, but then i could be wrong and you might of meant something different.
This is the very reason why Valve have already stated ages ago that they WILL NOT be having a playable demo. They want the game to be a surprise and playing a stolen version of it that caused Valve alot of heartache is the complete opposite.
Shuzer said:To each his own, I suppose. I've played it, but I'm in no ways unloyal to VALVe. I have almost every VALVe product, except for Gunman Chronicles. HL2 is one of the few games I genuinely want more than any other game I've ever seen. I don't see how me jumping at the chance to play HL2 was exactly unloyal, but everyone's entitled to their opinions.
Anyhow, I know the stolen build is a touchy subject, but I should ask you this, have you played the D3 alpha? If you have, you're unloyal to iD and not a true fan..
Rafael said:It's a fact, Half-Life 2 will suck. :dozey:
Shuzer said:Max Payne was awesome.
Max Payne 2 was awesomer.
Half-Life was awesome.
Half-Life 2 will be awesomer.
(I hope)
Alig said:I think everyone here is too ignorant ...HL2 can and might suck. You see my expectations are normal and most peoples expectations are so stupidly high that they will be in for a shock because HL2 will NOT revolutionize or have anything new to what we actually have now. It has'nt got the best graphics. It hasnt got better physics than ive already seen. It has a top secret story that will be good i know but so does doom3....the only thing HL2 has that no one has tried yet is realistic facial expressions...i mean seriously, that is the only new thing about it and it wont make the game amazingly better while everyone was slating FEAR for not having anything new.
When people say "not a chance in hell" and "You can have fun with just the engine" makes me think because farcry has as good physics as HL2 looks to have.
I hope the game wont be a disaster...while the devs say its better than HL1, of course they will...they have'nt worked 5 years for something to say its predecessor could still be better because HL1 was amazing.
Anyway, i think HL2 has as much chance of being crap as any sequel is and usually IS.
acme420 said:it bettr be game of the year or im gonna come down to your house and strangle your ass to death.
read my text S-T-R-A-N-G-L-E_Y-O-U-R_A-S-S_T-O_D-E-A-T-H.
merc said:no it is guaranteed to be game of the year i have playn it already remember? GAME OF THE YEAR. READ MY TEXT. G-A-M-E_O-F_T-H-E_Y-E-A-R.
-merc
Rupertvdb said:best post of the week to date.