theotherguy
Newbie
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2003
- Messages
- 5,107
- Reaction score
- 1
Magnesium? Wouldn't that be expensive? I'd have thought you'd need to get a lot of hydrogen out the stuff to make it economical. Plus, it's not-renewable, unless you plan on using lots of energy to convert the magnesium oxide back into magnesium, all of which would have to be solar energy, lest you use fossil fuels.
Home solar cells powering water electrolysis would work, I think, but they they would be expensive (maybe not in the long run though, due to savings on petrol), and they would be unreliable, at least in places like Britain (due to weather). Also, I don't know how much energy it would take to extract the hydrogen from the water compared to how much power output you'd get from a solar cell, but it might be that you'd be waiting ages for to get enough hydrogen to fill up your tank. We might have to wait for solar cells to become more efficient, is what I'm saying.
Bacteria sound promising, though
Is this THE END of all biofuels?? What about that power plant that runs off chicken shit, what if that has a negative energy balance too? I rather like the idea of biofuels, seeing as they're carbon-neutral and effectively run of solar power. I know there are other bio-fuels used in car engines, I hope they're not all as doomed as ethanol.
No, its not the end. Ethanol can be fixed to make it energy positive. For instance, if we harvested switchgrass and corn cellulose, we would have much more energy to use. Also, ethanol is probably a better idea politically and economically than oil because we don't have to rely on foreign shipping. I envision ethanol as a transition between oil and cleaner fuels like hydrogen.