F.E.A.R. or DOD source?

Both games are good but not worth their price IMO.

FEAR is good the first time around then you never have to touch it again. DOD:S just sucks.
 
Sheikah42 said:
okay well i just bought both lol

dod source is somewhat fun, but there are no maps

i find the multiplayer in fear to be really fun, but maybe thats just because its a new game and everyones a noob including myself, making easier to kill everyone.

however i'm a little confused

i have a 256 mb video card, and half-life 2 looks really nice and runs smooth. fear seems to be lacking A LOT OF DETAIL and is running at a LOWER FPS. is there like a reason for this?

fear also lacks a lot of multiplayer maps, but so far im havin more fun with that multiplayer than dod source. but so far in the beginning fear isn't that scary...

but maybe i just played too many resident evil games?

FEAR is the most gfx intensive game out right now.

The amount of models, bumpmaps, soft shadows (which distroy fps), and particle effects.

Fear might not look great in some sections like all games but it sure as hell doesnt look worse then hl2 or doom 3.
 
Ennui said:
DOD:S is amazing, FEAR is fun for about eight hours and then I completely lost all resolve to keep playing it - bland character and level design, the combat is fun the first twenty firefights but they're all the same and it's easy.

DOD:S has massive replay value and Valve will be releasing maps regularly for an indefinite period, plus it's a hell of a lot more fun.

DOD:S, without a doubt.
what he said.
 
Day of Defeat Source gets my vote.
I have both games, and although FEAR is fun; it simply doesnt have the replayability factor.
DoD Source never gets boring, and the new map is great.
Also it is cheap.
 
I say Day of Defeat Source. Thats because I have been hardcore dod since, what was it... sometime before the third beta release.
 
Back
Top