Forsake The Troops

He's not a liberal, he's a dick. He belongs to an entirely different sect of humanity that is somewhat lower than you can fathom. Celebrating when a troop dies because it saves him money? Yes, now that really does come off as sensible and rounded... Not at all a greedy pig.
 
gh0st said:
What, exactly, was his argument?
I am not too sure actually, he couldn't really talk at all. He thinks they don't get paid enough, but they get bribed with education, and they join because they are dumb...he didn't make much sense. He looked like an emo/goth kid though.
 
I originally thought the site was some kind of hoax.

Now I truly understand depravity.
 
Kangy said:
He's not a liberal, he's a dick. He belongs to an entirely different sect of humanity that is somewhat lower than you can fathom. Celebrating when a troop dies because it saves him money? Yes, now that really does come off as sensible and rounded... Not at all a greedy pig.
el Chi sincerely endorses this product/event/sentiment/defendant.
<Delete as applicable>

He's just another one of those people who is an embarassment to the political affiliation he claims to be a part of.
 
I am pretty sure he is just doing it for publicity/money.
 
Foxtrot said:
I am pretty sure he is just doing it for publicity/money.
Which makes him even MORE of an embarassment. The man is an utter fool.
 
el Chi said:
Which makes him even MORE of an embarassment. The man is an utter fool.
Ya, did you watch the video? He seems pretty confused, his web log also sounds like your average goth bitch-poetry.
 
Foxtrot said:
Ya, did you watch the video? He seems pretty confused, his web log also sounds like your average goth bitch-poetry.
I'm afraid I didn't watch it; it didn't seem worth the nausea I'm sure it would cause me. And as for his blog? Well, goth bitch-poetry generally makes me feel a bit light-headed (but not quite nauseous), so I figured I'd give that a miss too.
 
el Chi said:
I'm afraid I didn't watch it; it didn't seem worth the nausea I'm sure it would cause me. And as for his blog? Well, goth bitch-poetry generally makes me feel a bit light-headed (but not quite nauseous), so I figured I'd give that a miss too.
That is too bad, I found it pretty funny.
 
This is one of the few times where I actually find myself siding with Mr. Hannity.

Who wouldn't when he's up against such a douche bag?
 
wow, i had heard of the site, but didn;t realize the guy was actually such a dumbass, how can anyone be so utterly stupid and disrespectful? i'm glad sean hannity just flamed him, i'd spit on him if i saw him on the street, thanks for the video
 
Absinthe said:
This is one of the few times where I actually find myself siding with Mr. Hannity.

Who wouldn't when he's up against such a douche bag?
Michael Crook...?
 
the guys is an attention whore, there are rumors that he married his underage gf, and then knocked her up just for attention
 
Icarusintel said:
wow, i had heard of the site, but didn;t realize the guy was actually such a dumbass, how can anyone be so utterly stupid and disrespectful? i'm glad sean hannity just flamed him, i'd spit on him if i saw him on the street, thanks for the video

Yeah i agree, i thought maybe he would make some points, but no scotty he didnt. He has to be faking it for attention.
 
He wasn't reporting, he was debating, so it was perfectly acceptable to take the opposite stance and argue it as best he possibly can. Since when has being a bad reporter been worse than being a money grabbing, selfish and hollow human being?
 
Lemonking said:
that reporter is a even bigger dick

I wouldnt say that.
However, I think the guy who actually attacked his argument seemed to have a little more impact than the guy who attacked his character.
 
Foxtrot said:
Michael Crook...?

Of course Michael Crook. The little snotball is an embaressment not only to his supposed political group, but to humanity as well.

He has his freedom of speech, I understand. But I personally wouldn't have any qualms with watching the living piss get beaten out of him.
 
The reporter was an idiot too, but not as big as idiot as the forsake our troops guy.
 
I'll admit that personal attacks are not what I'd like to see coming from a supposed news reporter. But I'd be lying if I said I didn't gain satisfaction from it.
 
Haha wow. That guy got owned. He also sucks at debating too, he didn't get anywhere.
 
I like how he was asked a simple Yes or No question and he replied "Well the wages." "Michael! I didn't ask you about the wages!" "But the Wages!" "Michael!"
 
It pisses me off that the first thing I read on his site is "This is why 9/11 survivors deserve no sympathy"

What a ****ing cock
 
He is just an emo/goth trying to get attention. I bet he went home and cut himself to make him feel better. All he wan'ts is attention and to see other people who don't hate life suffer because he is pathetic.
 
I'm going to message that guy tomorrow on AIM, and ask him a few questions. I'm gonna kind of be aiming at getting him riled up and watching him defend himself.

Under a fake AIM identity, of course. ;) Think i'm planning on starting off pretending to be a supporter of his, and then totally go off on him. What a loser.
 
Lemonking said:
no matter how dumb that guys was as a reporter you must always stay neutral
Hannity is not a reporter, he's a commentator. The show's (Hannity and Colmes) premise is "right vs left" His co-host is Alan Colmes, a liberal. Alan Colmes, as much as I usually despise the things he goes for, also ripped into the guy.

The show wouldn't make sense if they were both neutral. Neutral part comes in the news reporting, but since you can't report news 24/7 (unless you went like "THERE WAS JUST A CAR CRASH IN MILWAUKE" or something) you need to have content shows that comment on the news that was said earlier, like Crossfire on CNN, Hannity and Colmes on Fox, etc etc. When they report news, though, it's just read neutral and factually
 
well he didnt hav e to assoult him,if I was that guy I would have replyed to that one "soldiers protetct ur liberty" question I would have said what does attacking Iraq have to with protecting our liberty?
 
Lemonking said:
well he didnt hav e to assoult him,if I was that guy I would have replyed to that one "soldiers protetct ur liberty" question I would have said what does attacking Iraq have to with protecting our liberty?

people get bored sometimes. :p


And uh, um.. uh, they were protecting the Iraqi's liberty.
 
Lemonking said:
well he didnt hav e to assoult him,if I was that guy I would have replyed to that one "soldiers protetct ur liberty" question I would have said what does attacking Iraq have to with protecting our liberty?
I don't see how he assaulted him. And the Forsake the Troops guy's not talking about Iraq though he's talking about troops in general, anytime, peace or war, no matter what war. His site was talking about how "their wages and benefits are so high they're idiots for getting blown up yadda yadda"
 
it just makes me feel good inside after seeing that jackass get BURNED by two guys that were probably older and much tanner than he was.

and his website just makes me want to find him and kick his ass all the way back to Freak-O-Land.

"Where the freaks find YOU!!" :p
 
RakuraiTenjin said:
I don't see how he assaulted him. And the Forsake the Troops guy's not talking about Iraq though he's talking about troops in general, anytime, peace or war, no matter what war. His site was talking about how "their wages and benefits are so high they're idiots for getting blown up yadda yadda"



he said "ur dumb" "ur not very bright" so on
 
no thats just his opinon deal with it.
american journalism sucks
 
Back
Top