Ghostbusters III

joule

Tank
Joined
May 21, 2004
Messages
6,800
Reaction score
0
Dan Aykroyd visited radio station CISN Country and revealed that a Ghostbusters III is in the works.

Aykroyd said that the film will be CGI and Bill Murray has agreed to do the voice of Dr. Peter Venkman. No word on whether Harold Ramis, Ernie Hudson or any other of the original actors will return to voice their characters.

http://comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=18723

Great news, though a bit weary of how it will look CGI-wise, but really looking forward to it.
 
CGI?....:( I'd rather have the whole gang back...that would be one kick-ass movie.
 
CGI?....:( I'd rather have the whole gang back...that would be one kick-ass movie.

I really don't like the CGI idea, but keep in mind that the actors are kind of old now so maybe it would've been for the best to just leave those two movies and forget a sequel.
 
this is worse than teh proposed DBZ live action movie.
 
When you think of a live action Dragon Ball Z, you will imagine this:

"YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGH!!11"

for 2 and 1/2 hours.
 
When you think of a live action Dragon Ball Z, you will imagine this:

"YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGH!!11"

for 2 and 1/2 hours.
Wrong.

It would be 2 hours, and the other 1/2 hour is shitty puns.

On that note, I like DBZ. :(
 
When you think of a live action Dragon Ball Z, you will imagine this:

"YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGH!!11"

for 2 and 1/2 hours.

and bright lights and people fliying around and whssss and phizzzann and woooossshh and KAME KAME HAAAAAAAA!

I also liked dbz when I was kid but dam a real live movie thats dumb!
 
ah hollywood you wouldnt recognise a hit if your freaking life depended on it ...the reason why GB was a hit in the first place were it's stars ..not the effects, not the caco-demons not Slimer ..it was bill murray and the rest of the cast that stole the movie ..take out the 3 principle actors and you have a run of the mill action movie

if Ramis is involved it has somewhat oif a chance but why go CGI? unless they want to push the envelope in terms of special effects ..the original was character driven, this just sounds like a cash in
 
I repeat

maybe it would've been for the best to just leave those two movies and forget a sequel.

I mean FFS what the hell is this fad now to make a trilogy out of every movie that was half decent. Those two movies were good they don't need a sequel let them bee damn it!

CptStern said:
ah Hollywood you wouldnt recognise a hit if your freaking life depended on it

QFT
 
Unfortunately, my undying love for the franchise will compel me to go see this one no matter how bad it looks.
 
Back
Top