Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Well, if you're saying they arent military (& therefore covered by geneva conventions) then they must be civilian, and as we all know, the US engaged these civilians in afghanistan.
seinfeldrules said:They are terrorists...
Eg. said:no. im going to belive that those being tortured are the ones that are the ones wanting us dead. im inculding u in "us" because u are a westerner.
...
now, most of theses guys think that the west is evil
Eg. said:i dont see why we would have to respect their religion in any form,
Crashing the democracy by installing governments, that they want, e.g. in Iran:Eg. said:wars should serve as punishment and as a lesson. other nations should get a clear message: dont mess with us,
Mossadeq was removed from power in a complex plot orchestrated by British and US intelligence agencies ("Operation Ajax"). ... But the nation demonstrates and supports Mossadeq, so Shah has to get out of country. The first time in the 2500 years history of Iran won the democracy. But the CIA needs even not a week to revolt Shah back to power.
This kind of behaviour disgusts me.
This behaviour makes you just as bad as the people who attacked you, fools.
Don't you see that this, if they ever admitted it to their family, could lead to their complete exclusion religiously, a strong source of community?
K e r b e r o s said:It does'nt disgust me so much as it shows me that when were at our worst, still better then them at practioning human rights. I understand the position that the fake menstural blood is a form of torture -- however I beg to differ on such a statement; including the fact we dont torture until death. We dont even technically, practise the correct way of torture.
kerberos said:Also, how does this even categorize as fake "menstural" blood? Its fake blood, with a lie put behind it.
I think, more correctly, many of those "terrorists" simply want you to get the hell out of their land and leave them alone. So why do you believe that any and all of these people can be herded and tortured so harshly?
Completely different situation. It would be more like a police officer interrogating a murderer who could potentially lead the police to a serial killer. The police officer puts an empty gun to his head and tells him to talk. Even then, it is much worse than rubbing fake blood on somebody.so if I walk up to a police officer point an unloaded gun to his face, he'll let me go as soon as I tell him "dont worry mr officer it's not loaded"
seinfeldrules said:Completely different situation. It would be more like a police officer interrogating a murderer who could potentially lead the police to a serial killer. The police officer puts an empty gun to his head and tells him to talk. Even then, it is much worse than rubbing fake blood on somebody.
And a citizen couldnt do what you suggested... It was an analogy.a police officer cannot do that
seinfeldrules said:They want us out of their land?
If an Iraqi soldier "interrogated" an American suspect (imprisoned without trial or conviction, yadda yadda yadda, details details) by smearing menstrual discharge on their faces - or at least making them believe that they were being smeared with menstrual discharge - you'd be f*cking outraged. So stop being such an ignorant little c*nt and realise that it's a foul f*cking act and yet another one that the people over in good ole Guantanamo Bay should be ashamed of.Eg. said:im serious. i dont give a damn what religion u are, mess with america, and ur screwed. in a bad way
Eg. said:of course 2x as many civilians have been killed by american forces, it was a war. we bombed them. the terrorist though, have produced most of the deaths after we took the natio ex:
we kill 20,000 taking over the nation
in the time span of a year, the terrorists blow up 10,000 more, where as american forces kill none.
Wait what? I'm having trouble reading this. Right now, in my brain, seems like you're saying we're responsible for the deaths of 500,000 children (no argument there) because we targeted water treatment plants with our sanctions? Set me straight here.CptStern said::upstare: you wanna backup your claims? 7000+ iraqis were killed by US bombing in the first few weeks of the invasion, another 7000+ died as a result of either terrorism or US military intervention ..still doesnt compare to the 500,000 children that died during the sanctions. The US is responsible for that because they deliberately targeted water treatment plants
CptStern said::upstare: you wanna backup your claims? 7000+ iraqis were killed by US bombing in the first few weeks of the invasion, another 7000+ died as a result of either terrorism or US military intervention ..still doesnt compare to the 500,000 children that died during the sanctions. The US is responsible for that because they deliberately targeted water treatment plants
exactly my point
"BAGHDAD, Iraq - Operations by U.S. and multinational forces and Iraqi police are killing twice as many Iraqis - most of them civilians - as attacks by insurgents, according to statistics compiled by the Iraqi Health Ministry and obtained exclusively by Knight Ridder."
Eg. said:notice how i say example, i use "ex" in terms to twice as many civs died because of the war then to terrorists. the real number can be 16k to 8k or whatever.
half a million kids died? ok. how much money did saddam strangle out of the oil for food program? 21billion? u need 8 glasses(8oz) of water a day to live. since iraq is hot, ill give the kiddies 10 glasses
so a 80z bottle of water in my school is 1 dollar.
so 21,000,000,000/10(glasses0=2,100,000,000(bottles of water)
2,100,000,000/500,000=4,200 days of water
4,200/365(days in a year)=11.5
wow, somehow if iraq spent its money right, it could have kept those kids alive buy buying water. until the next war. at FULL market price, not at the reduced price bulk products are sold at. and what about all that damned aid the evil USA and Europe gave Iraq? so we are to blame for their fudge ups?
steve, hes saying we bombed them, which we did
Eg. said:i dont have to defend something i agree with. by all means, bomb the treatment plants, power plants, factories, cities, and all other parts of the nation.
war. people die. i just happen to live on the winning side.
so then how did the 7000+ die during the invasion? where they strapping themselves to their friendly neighbourhood terrorists?
seinfeldrules said:When terrorists position themselves in mosques and residential housing...
What would a soldier have to gain by intentionally killing a civilian? 10 years like the Abu Gharib soldier?
Then they were cowardly soldiers.what terrorists? for the last time this was DURING the invasion ..there were no terrorists only Iraqi soldiers
CptStern said:edit: hey I just noticed you were banned ..about time
K e r b e r o s said:lol, what was it?
K e r b e r o s said:Saddam during the Iran Iraq, and Iraq Kuwait, AND Iraq OMFG PULL OUT OF KUWAIT war, used civilians targets to station his Anti-Aircraft batteries.
Its no suprise where the terrorist learned this from.
Absinthe said:TBH His reason for being banned was completely effin' weak.
fake menstrual blood
Absinthe said:He posted a video advert for ending the use of landmines.